Tampa woman sues employer over gun rules
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Tampa woman sues employer over gun rules

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2014, 01:32 PM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 2,823
Liked 1768 Times on 989 Posts
Likes Given: 1302

Default Tampa woman sues employer over gun rules

A quick summary. This woman was a branch manager at a bank. She took her gun to work. She got fired because policy states she can't take her gun to work. She's suing.

LINK

This happened in Florida, like we really need more of this crap floating around. Anyway, in Florida it is illegal for an employer to ask employees or customers if they have a firearm in their car unless it is one of the commonly banned industries that you all should know. This really doesn't apply, but it would have provided a legal, if less effective, alternative to what she did.

So, what do you think? From a present day legal standpoint, does she have a case? Did she deserve to be fired?

__________________
Doc3402 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-24-2014, 01:41 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Rick1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Clifton,Colorado
Posts: 4,391
Liked 2033 Times on 1118 Posts
Likes Given: 1351

Default

I have the same rule where I work. I can not carry. I wish I could afford to quit and get a job in the firearms industry. But I make a lot of money. And my expenses have come up to meet my income. I have two car payments and a mortgage. My boss owns the business. He has the right to fire me if I choose not to obey the rules. Therefore I do not carry at work. The bank teller had the same choices I do. It is not my property. The owner has asked me not to carry. Therefore I do not carry.

__________________

Romans 1:16 I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile.

Rick1967 is offline  
5
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2014, 01:52 PM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 17,192
Liked 9570 Times on 4118 Posts
Likes Given: 1499

Default

Have to agree with Rick. MY car, MY choice. YOUR business, YOUR choice.

__________________

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
6
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2014, 02:11 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 2,823
Liked 1768 Times on 989 Posts
Likes Given: 1302

Default

Before this thread climbs into the hand-basket for that trip to you-know-where, I also agree with the employer's right to do what they did. Whether this woman knew the policy or not is immaterial. She should have known it, and if she really wanted that job, she should have followed it. Life is full of choices. She made hers and it bit her.

I do have a question, and if anybody runs across the answer, please post it. Did this woman have a carry permit? I know it's early in the reporting process, but nobody has mentioned one yet.

__________________
Doc3402 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2014, 02:12 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,342
Liked 1093 Times on 566 Posts
Likes Given: 594

Default

I'm actually surprised she found an Ambulance chaser to take her case. Maybe more to it then the News article states.

This has been court tested many times before. The end result is always the same. The employer can fire you for disobeying company policy. She is toast.

Parking lost and vehicles, different story, inside the building, not so much.

__________________
mseric is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2014, 02:27 PM   #6
JTJ
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lake Havasu,Arizona
Posts: 6,623
Liked 2416 Times on 1308 Posts
Likes Given: 695

Default

The solution for this is simple. Pass a law stating: If an entity, be it business or government facility forbids firearms (Means of self protection) on the premises that entity should be held accountable for the protection of the people legally on its premises and should be held liable for damages incurred. Once they get sued for major damages a few times the insurance companies will get on board and attitudes will change. Unfortunately Libertards dont understand simple.

__________________

Patron Member NRA
"I would not be an old man if I had not been an armed young man." JTJ
I was taught to respect my elders but they are getting harder to find.

JTJ is offline  
7
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2014, 03:47 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,599
Liked 2258 Times on 1228 Posts
Likes Given: 3531

Default

i have mixed emotions on this one. OK has a law, tested in federal courts, that allows employees to have guns in vehicles parked in the company lot. This came about after the new manager of the Weyerhaeuser plant in SE OK went on a witch hunt and asked the local cops to search vehicles in the company parking lot. Several employes were fired because they had guns in their vehicles.

The OK legislature passed a law that allowed employees to leave their guns in their vehicles in the company lot. Some other companies joined the lawsuit and the law was overturned. The OK legislature re-did the law only to have it appealed on OSHA grounds. Some of those companies dropped out of this appeal because of threated of boycott of their products. The federal court said OSHA did not apply and that was that.

__________________
alsaqr is offline  
Axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2014, 05:04 PM   #8
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Overkill0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,560
Liked 3099 Times on 1553 Posts
Likes Given: 383

Default

Quote:
So, what do you think? From a present day legal standpoint, does she have a case? Did she deserve to be fired?
I don't believe she has a case. Her employer has every right to say what is & isn't permissible on their property (within limits of course.) Whether I agree isn't really relevant.
Whether she deserved to be fired is situation dependent. If she didn't have a history of problems and was willing to comply with the policy, I probably wouldn't have fired her. However, since it's now a lawsuit, I suspect that she probably expressed her opinion and future intent to not comply.
__________________
Cheers,
Greg
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

Liberals are constantly telling us about the poor and oppressed in this country. With that in mind, why do they feel the need to keep importing poor people from other countries?
Overkill0084 is offline  
Axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2014, 06:20 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lima,Ohio
Posts: 3,101
Liked 2782 Times on 1253 Posts
Likes Given: 2665

Default

How did they know she had a gun? Why didn't she just keep it in her purse and not tell anybody? It's one thing to violate a rule, it's just stupid to get caught. I don't blame her for carrying but she should have kept it to herself.

__________________
rjd3282 is offline  
4
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2014, 06:21 PM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JW357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,716
Liked 3728 Times on 2285 Posts
Likes Given: 1224

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Overkill0084 View Post
However, since it's now a lawsuit, I suspect that she probably expressed her opinion and future intent to not comply.
That's basically what I was wondering. Was this the first time this happened or was she told to not have her gun on her (specifically) previously?

Legally I suppose it doesn't matter. I'm just curious as to the disposition of the employer. Did he give her multiple chances or was this the first offense?

No I haven't read through the link. No time right now. I will after work.


It was time for a new signature. This is what you get.
__________________

Always have clean socks.

JW357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
which are you? employee or employer? bobski The Club House 26 09-01-2013 12:49 PM
Employer superceding my 2A rights? KBlue Legal and Activism 34 06-07-2010 07:09 PM
Woman Sues Google for Bad Directions gregs887 The Club House 14 06-01-2010 10:52 PM
Why is it that a single woman is thinner then a married woman? opaww The Club House 4 05-31-2010 11:16 PM
can my employer really do this? spittinfire The Club House 14 06-17-2009 07:49 PM