What do those liberals think they will accomplish by trying to get rid of guns. If someone wants to kill someone else, they'll find a way. If they can't get a gun, they'll use a knife. If they can't get a knife, they'll us something else sharp and pointy, If they can't find anything they can use for a weapon, they'll just beat someone to death. The only thing getting rid of guns will accomplish is making it harder for citizens to safely defend themselves.
(If a liberal was cornered by a serial killer and they just happened to find a gun, I wonder if they would choose to use it of if they would let the serial killer kill them?
That extremist would of killed those people even if America had stricter gun laws. He could easily get guns elsewhere. In place like Iraq and Afganistan, guns are easy to come by. He could probably get pretty much anything he wanted. Especially if he had ties to any of the extremist groups over there.
I'm pretty much fed of with the government now. We need to replace most of the people in the senate and the house of reps and we really need to replace the president and most if not all of his cabinet. We need to put our prioritys in order. Insted of harassing law abiding citizens with gun controll laws, they need to find away to help the economy recover.
Here's a little proof that gun control laws do not help.
In 1960, the population was 179,323,175. The total number of crimes was 3,384,200 with 228,460 of those being violent (6.75%).
In 2009, the population was 307,006,550. The total number of crimes was 10,639,369 with 1,318,398 of those being violent (12.39%).
Gun control laws are stricter than they were in 1960. That mean that the more gun control laws that there are, the more violent crime there is.
Hard to argue with ain't it.
Here is a link the the site that I got this info from.
United States Crime Rates 1960 - 2009