Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Senate 'Gun Control' Compromise Likely this week

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2013, 11:38 AM   #121
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
chloeshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Great North Woods
Posts: 2,038
Liked 1433 Times on 786 Posts
Likes Given: 309

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HockaLouis

And NONE of the pretense from the lying Left, parroted by their useful-idiots, is going to change a damned thing about "gun violence" for all intent and (their) puropse of disuading and ultimately disarming law-abiding citizens from private ownership of arms.
Preaching to the choir here. have fun trying to convince a Libby
__________________
leave the cannoli - take the gun
chloeshooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2013, 05:20 PM   #122
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 2,297
Liked 1258 Times on 786 Posts
Likes Given: 669

Default

[QUOTE=c3shooter;1211064]Jim- what I have seen happening with firearms since 1968 should not be called a compromise.

The dictionary definition of "compromise": A settlement of differences in which each side makes concessions.


Sorry- but I damn sure do not see the other side making any concessions. It is a bite here, a nibble there, a little more there, ad infinitum.


But what the hell- it's just a little chain. I'm sure we'll hardly feel it.

Thank you for the correction!!!
I have been telling people not to get caught up in 'their' terminology and I did it myself!!!
Those who control the narrative control the debate!

__________________

An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!

JimRau is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 12:05 AM   #123
War and Peace
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas by God, Texas!
Posts: 24,548
Liked 16904 Times on 9798 Posts
Likes Given: 44077

Default

to me a compromise is when a mutual agreement is made that is beneficial to both parties.

at what point have the law abiding gun owner gotten any benefits from any of the compromises made to date? best recollection on my part, none!

__________________
Coming from the Village of the Damned.
Axxe55 is offline  
texaswoodworker Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2013, 12:37 AM   #124
Deader Bears=Better Bears
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: BFE,Mississippi
Posts: 19,107
Liked 5654 Times on 3323 Posts
Likes Given: 4773

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HockaLouis View Post
So lemme get this straight:

The only reason you didn't buy stolen guns was you were afraid you could get caught, and...

...you think criminals care about whether or not the illegal gun they have comes up as stolen when they're caught with it and a national registry of stolen guns will keep crooks from stealing or smuggling them to sell to each other.

Wow. And you vote? Just, wow.
On the first point, are you sure that I am not a criminal, or are you a criminal, or do you read random criminal minds as a hobby? It wasn't that I was really "worried about getting caught", since I could almost-legitimately claim to have purchased the stolen firearm without any knowledge of its theft status, since the database that already exists listing firearms reported as stolen is not available to private citizens, only LEO's and supposedly only as part of "active investigations". I have emailed the state AG and BATF on this issue, as well as speaking with the local police on how I could check a firearm's status; I was disappointed with the answers. I don't see me getting in any real legal trouble over a second-hand stolen firearm, so long as I can't be connected to its theft, BUT I would lose the firearm and the money spent on it with little recourse (legal recourse anyway). It would be like renting a firearm until such time as an LEO encountered it.

So, as a person who has at least been offered and drooled over a stolen firearm, I assure you that its value was lessened in my eyes as a consumer by its status as stolen and probably reported stolen.

For the thieves (who were actually quite thick in this case), the theft of the items was about profit. I saw the firearm at a buddy's house who was trying to find them a spare magazine to make the item more saleable, BECAUSE they were having trouble selling it at a decent price that would make their theft worth their time.

Not a felon, so yes voting is always an option.

If the Kahr had been a PM9 or CW9 instead of a PM40, I would've probably given them the $100 for it, but I would've considered it "a rental".
__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.
GANDER MOUNTAIN OF HATTIESBURG, MS IS OVERPRICED, HAS LOUSY CUSTOMER SERVICE, & SELLS BEAT UP PISTOLS TO LITTLE OLD LADIES AS "NEW". :p

orangello is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Alternative Compromise to Gun Control starving030 Legal and Activism 41 03-26-2013 01:54 PM
Gun Control Hits Snag in Senate Stillersfan Legal and Activism 26 03-26-2013 03:52 AM
Today's senate committee hearing on gun control legislation StainlessSteel215 Legal and Activism 35 03-07-2013 09:21 PM