Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Senate committee

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2013, 01:23 AM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,772
Liked 5138 Times on 2930 Posts
Likes Given: 4344

Default Senate committee

Passes out bill for universal background checks. Vote was 10-8.

All democRATS voted yes.

All republicans voted no.

Looks like those danged republicans really sold us out!

__________________

"Politics is the art of the possible" Otto von Bismarck.

locutus is offline  
nitestalker Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 03-13-2013, 01:26 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Ruger22lr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 434
Liked 79 Times on 59 Posts
Likes Given: 69

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post
Passes out bill for universal background checks. Vote was 10-8.

All democRATS voted yes.

All republicans voted no.

Looks like those danged republicans really sold us out!
Seriously? It didn't? All the places I've been looking have said it did.
__________________

Last edited by Ruger22lr; 03-13-2013 at 01:28 AM.
Ruger22lr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 01:39 AM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,772
Liked 5138 Times on 2930 Posts
Likes Given: 4344

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruger22lr View Post
Seriously? It didn't? All the places I've been looking have said it did.

yes!! It did pass. 10-8 party line vote.
__________________

"Politics is the art of the possible" Otto von Bismarck.

locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 01:48 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Ruger22lr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 434
Liked 79 Times on 59 Posts
Likes Given: 69

Default

Thought so.

__________________
Ruger22lr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 05:27 AM   #5
Kostriker
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,122
Liked 1749 Times on 997 Posts
Likes Given: 3530

Default

Article relating to the issue:

http://twitchy.com/2013/03/12/sen-chuck-schumers-background-check-bill-raises-red-flags-with-gun-rights-supporters/

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/author/foghorn/

We’ve finally gotten a look at Chuck Shumer’s proposed mandatory background check bill, and the truth is that this thing is ridiculous. The bill is overly broad, has some crazy penalties, and cracks the door WIDE open for government abuse. The full text of the bill is here, and since it’s in that terrible bill-speak legalese, I’ll try to summarize it for you . . .

The main provision of the bill is that any transfer of a firearm, no matter how fleeting, needs to go through an FFL and the transferee needs to have a background check performed through the NICS system. There are some exceptions, but they aren’t very good ones. Page 11 starts off the meat and potatoes for those following along at home.

In order to qualify for an exception to the rule of all transfers going through an FFL, the following requirements must be met:

The temporary transfer takes place at the owner’s house
The gun can’t be moved from the property
The transfer must last less than 7 days

There’s also a poorly worded exception for hunting and “sporting purposes,” as well as gifts to family members. What that means is if you go on a trip for more than 7 days and leave your guns at home unattended with a roommate, its now a felony under this law. And if I’m reading this right, this applies if you leave your guns with your spouse, but don’t transfer them as a gift.

There’s also no exception for lending guns to friends for the afternoon on the range. I regularly loan out my older competition guns to friends who want to compete in local matches, as the guns can be expensive and its easier to figure out if competition shooting is right for you if you can give it a try. Under this new bill, that would be illegal.

It also appears that it would be illegal to hand a firearm to someone other than the owner, effectively killing range trips with friends.

I quote from the bill the definition of “transfer” includes:
shall include a sale, gift, loan, return from pawn or consignment, or other disposition

Broad much? The only exception appears to be handing a gun to a potential buyer to evaluate and lending guns at a shooting range but ONLY IF:
at a shooting range located in or on premises owned or occupied by a duly incorporated organization organized for conservation purposes or to foster proficiency in firearms and the firearm is, at all times, kept within the premises of the shooting range;

So, only facilities where the stated purpose in the incorporation documents is conservation (hunting) or firearms proficiency. And if you’re shooting on your own private property, or on BLM land, ANY lending of guns EVEN IN THE PRESENCE OF THE OWNER for recreational shooting would be illegal.
As one of the provisions designed to “alleviate the fears” of the gun-owning public, it looks like there’s a provision in here that permanently sets the price of all FFL transfer fees to the same amount. That number will be set by the Attorney General, which these days is still Eric Holder. The current speculation is that this FFL fee will be used to do what the NFA tax was originally designed to do — make buying or transferring a gun so expensive that almost no one can do it.

In addition to the transfer requirements, it also makes it a federal felony to fail to report a lost or stolen firearm. If the gun isn’t reported to the authorities within 24 hours, that’s a 5-year stretch in a federal pokey you just earned yourself.

The bill also specifically removes the ability for people with state permits to skip the NICS check. Currently in Texas, those with a concealed handgun license can purchase a gun without a NICS check as they’ve already passed a more stringent background check than NICS provides. This puts more strain on the FFL as well as the NICS system.

As written, this bill is a train wreck. It creates felons out of people who may not have been aware that their roommate (on their month long trip through Asia) even owned a firearm, much less that there was one in the house. It allows the government to regulate the price of background checks, enacting a mandatory fee (read tax) to be paid every time you want to exercise a right guaranteed by the Second Amendment, and lets the government set the fee at whatever level they choose with no recourse. It also creates de facto registration through the NICS checks as well as the paperwork preservation requirements already in place.

You don’t have to pay a fee to vote, as the supreme court ruled that unconstitutional. But for Chuck Shumer, its okay to charge a fee to exercise your Second Amendment right. And he’ll tell you how much to pay.

http://www.pagunblog.com/2013/03/12/we-have-language-for-s-374-the-transfer-ban/

Read this:

http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/legislation/upload/ALB13180.pdf

__________________

Last edited by Bigcountry02; 03-13-2013 at 05:33 AM.
Bigcountry02 is offline  
dog2000tj Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 05:37 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Edge of Darkness
Posts: 6,495
Liked 4788 Times on 2678 Posts
Likes Given: 1736

Default

In the rural West and Alaska there is not always an FFL near by. This would be difficult to make these transfers. This is after all pay back because the NRA and gun owners did not support the Dems. Obama is using his last term to get even. This is Chicago politics.

__________________
nitestalker is offline  
locutus Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 05:37 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
unclebear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bardstown,Kentucky
Posts: 1,101
Liked 182 Times on 132 Posts
Likes Given: 184

Default

This is BS, the got darn thought police. Looks like obama and his SS are having fun doing crack in the white house

__________________

"come on you sons of b***hs! do you want to live forever?" Sergeant Daniel Daly, USMC, Belleau Wood France June 6th 1918

"You can be as mad as a mad dog at the way things went. You could swear, curse the fates, but when it comes to the end, you have to let go" Benjamin Button

BE PREPARED

unclebear is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 07:30 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Ruger22lr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 434
Liked 79 Times on 59 Posts
Likes Given: 69

Default

Wow talk about stupid laws. This one takes the cake.

__________________
Ruger22lr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 02:16 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,772
Liked 5138 Times on 2930 Posts
Likes Given: 4344

Default

Since it doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing in it's current form, I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.

__________________

"Politics is the art of the possible" Otto von Bismarck.

locutus is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2013, 02:23 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
davva360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 373
Liked 138 Times on 76 Posts
Likes Given: 41

Default

It is pathetic. Its just another way of making gun ownership more difficult in hopes of scaring some people off the idea

__________________
davva360 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Today's senate committee hearing on gun control legislation StainlessSteel215 Legal and Activism 35 03-07-2013 09:21 PM
alabama law being considered by committee Devin556 Legal and Activism 20 02-07-2013 06:41 PM
senate judicuary committee on gun violence paintsplat Legal and Activism 12 02-02-2013 12:07 AM
senate judicuary committee on gun violence paintsplat Legal and Activism 4 01-30-2013 11:00 PM
New Jersey Assembly Committee Passes Gun Ban! opaww Legal and Activism 11 06-14-2008 01:38 PM