You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

Sen. Rand Paul Seeks Gun Exemption in so-called Patriot Act Legislation

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-24-2011, 02:48 PM   #1
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Bigcountry02's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 7,151
Liked 2380 Times on 1408 Posts
Likes Given: 5193

Default Sen. Rand Paul Seeks Gun Exemption in so-called Patriot Act Legislation

This is from Gun Owners of America.

Seems NRA is not saying a word on this matter. S. 1038: Patriot Sunsets Extension Act of 2011.

An email has been sent to Sen. Bingaman and Sen. Udall for New Mexico

Sen. Rand Paul Seeks Gun Exemption in so-called Patriot Act Legislation - Gun Owners Of America

Monday, 23 May 2011 18:54 The House and Senate Republican and Democratic leadership have reached a “deal” on extending three expiring provisions of post-9/11 legislation for four years. Following a procedural vote on Monday night, the real battle begins on the bill.

Gun Owners of America worked with Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) on legislation to exempt 4473’s (the form all buyers fill out when a gun is purchased from a licensed dealer) from that statute’s broad provisions. Sen. Paul will offer that amendment this week, assuming Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is not able to block the amendment from being offered.

Here’s a major concern: Assume the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) goes to the “secret court” (the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or “FISA” court) and argues, without anyone else in the room, that ALL 4473’s should be seized as “business records” because they are relevant to a terrorism investigation.

Can it do that? It’s certainly a big enough danger to warrant our concern and that of Sen. Paul.

In 1986, Congress enacted the McClure-Volkmer Firearms Owners Protection Act to limit BATFE access to 4473’s and other gun records. Such records can only be viewed as part of a “bona fide criminal investigation,” in connection with a trace, or pursuant to an annual inspection.

But under McClure-Volkmer, the BATFE clearly could not seize every 4473 in the country because of a generalized terrorism investigation.

The Paul amendment would make it clear that McClure-Volkmer is still applicable law and was not overturned by 9/11 legislation.

ACTION: Contact your two Senators. Ask them to support the Paul amendment and to oppose any effort to invoke cloture (shut off debate) on the bill in order to make the Paul amendment out of order.

Last edited by Bigcountry02; 05-24-2011 at 02:51 PM.
Bigcountry02 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
New Jersey gun laws - Guilty till proven you qualify for an exemption Yunus Legal and Activism 35 12-23-2010 05:31 PM
The Obama administration seeks to please a strongman. AsmelEduardo Politics, Religion and Controversy 2 05-01-2009 05:03 PM
Geithner Seeks Power to Seize Imperiled Firms! Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 18 03-30-2009 03:45 PM