Oregon - Massive Gun Ban Introduced
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Oregon - Massive Gun Ban Introduced

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2013, 06:08 AM   #1
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,632
Liked 2024 Times on 1183 Posts
Likes Given: 4309

Default Oregon - Massive Gun Ban Introduced

Attention Oregonians.

Massive Gun Ban Introduced

http://www.leg.state.or.us/13reg/measpdf/hb3200.dir/hb3200.intro.pdf

http://www.oregonfirearms.org/massive-gun-ban-introduced

Two days after Senate Democrats claimed they would not seek a ban on modern firearms and feeding devices, Democrats in the Oregon House introduced just that.

Seven Senators joined with eight House Reps to introduce a sweeping ban on virtually all modern firearms. Among the Senators is, of course, Ginny Burdick, who claimed on Wednesday “that she is backing off an attempt to push through a bill on gun clips that she drafted following the December shootings at the Clackamas Mall.” The other sponsors are:

Representatives BAILEY, BUCKLEY, DEMBROW, FREDERICK, READ, REARDON, TOMEI, Senators , DINGFELDER, HASS, MONNES- ANDERSON, MONROE, SHIELDS, STEINER- HAYWARD.

Remember them.

HB 3200 not only bans most modern guns and magazines, it allows warrantless searches of your home, requires background checks and registration for a firearm you already own and as-of-yet undefined storage requirements. We say “a firearm” because even if you comply with the restrictions in this bill you may still only own one.

(Of course the bill does not apply to “government employees”.)

The bill combines the most extreme and irrational elements of other bills that have been introduced across the country. For example, one of the firearms banned under this bill would be a pistol with a “folding, telescoping or thumbhole stock.” No, that is not a misprint.

The principle sponsor of the bill is House Rep Mitch Greenlick, who in the past has concentrated on such worthy endeavors as banning children in bike trailers and making possession of cigarettes a crime.

The bill bans such deadly features as “pistol grips” and “barrel shrouds” because clearly they add to the lethality of any firearm. These people are so full of hatred for gun owners they don’t even understand what they are banning.

Never have we seen legislation that was a product of so much ignorance and blind hatred. And don’t take any comfort from the claims that bills of this kind are not going to get a hearing. You will recall that last session they said the same thing about a ban on licensed carry in schools. They claimed it was dead and then revived it in the closing days of the session without even allowing public testimony. It was only your relentless efforts that killed it. And now we need you again. Please use our automailer to send a message to the legislature to do all they can to stop HB 3200 and any bill like it. You can use the message provided or write your own.

__________________
Bigcountry02 is offline  
bluez Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-23-2013, 06:21 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Edge of Darkness
Posts: 6,495
Liked 4792 Times on 2680 Posts
Likes Given: 1736

Default

The Democrats are drunk with their power. They have worked since the end of the Civil War to disarm the American public. They ignore the fact that 49% of American voters were opposed to them.

__________________
nitestalker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 06:24 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Jpyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,832
Liked 776 Times on 449 Posts
Likes Given: 492

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitestalker View Post
The Democrats are drunk with their power. They have worked since the end of the Civil War to disarm the American public. They ignore the fact that 49% of American voters were opposed to them.
Well that means 51% support them or are ignorantly indifferent...and that's all the left needs to win, ignorance and indifference. I have thought about a similar situation that would clarify our position for gun owners and came up with this: suppose your town council or state decided that Pit Bulls posed a risk to children due to their reputation, misplaced or not, for viciousness and a propensity to attack and kill other pets and children. The legislature passed a ban on the sale, breeding and possession of all Pit Bulls with no grandfathering. Would you be willing to turn in your pet to be put down? My hunch is that their reaction would be slightly different than "but who needs a Pit Bull anyway..."
__________________

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington


Last edited by Jpyle; 02-23-2013 at 06:31 AM.
Jpyle is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 02:35 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,270
Liked 6611 Times on 3684 Posts
Likes Given: 6272

Default

That's okay/ November 2014 will be here before you know it1

locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 02:57 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Daoust_Nat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando,Florida
Posts: 2,163
Liked 1294 Times on 629 Posts
Likes Given: 77

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post
That's okay/ November 2014 will be here before you know it1
November 2012 didn't do much good for us. If the Republicans that did not vote had voted for Romney, we would not be having these conversations!

I sure as hell hope California bans using these guns in movies. They would scare me!
__________________

A bad day at the range is better then a good day on the job!

Daoust_Nat is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 03:15 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
NC1760's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Nawth Cackalackee
Posts: 1,103
Liked 838 Times on 464 Posts
Likes Given: 1735

Default

HEY OREGON ANTI-GUN POLITICOS:


If this isn't a trump card to you're proposals... I wish someone like this would have been (even allowed) at Sandy Hook... and the law-abiding gun owners at the Aurora shooting are probably still beating themselves up about obeying their laws.
__________________
NC1760 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 04:05 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,596
Liked 2258 Times on 1228 Posts
Likes Given: 3528

Default

Oregon is one of the states likely to pass draconian gun control this year.

__________________
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 04:13 PM   #8
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

Yeah, this really sucks. One of the main reasons I moved to Oregon from California was to escape tyrannical gun laws. We just have to keep on fighting. There's no rest for the weary when it comes to defending freedom.

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 04:34 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9
Liked 8 Times on 5 Posts

Default

One of the reasons this crap continues to be forced on us is that the a$$hats that force this stuff on us aren't held accountable for their poor decisions.

__________________

Last edited by rubin51; 02-24-2013 at 04:38 PM.
rubin51 is offline  
NC1760 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2013, 05:07 PM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

There's a slew of more anti 2A laws being proposed right now. It never even slows down.

http://www.oregonfirearms.org/2013-legislative-session/2013-gun-bills

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
So feinsteins AWB bill was introduced today but Gh0zt36 Politics, Religion and Controversy 10 01-25-2013 06:31 AM
10 New Gun Bills Introduced to Congress on Thursday Rarity Legal and Activism 3 01-05-2013 08:42 PM
Ruger LC9 Introduced ScottA General Handgun Discussion 10 01-03-2011 11:59 PM
HR 45 Introduced by Illinois Rep. Bobby Rush Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 01-14-2009 04:41 PM
Bi-Partisan Bill Introduced, H.R. 6691 Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 08-07-2008 10:46 PM