October 7th, 2010 Freedom of speech no longer allowed
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > October 7th, 2010 Freedom of speech no longer allowed

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2010, 05:50 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,900
Liked 2057 Times on 827 Posts
Likes Given: 2706

Default October 7th, 2010 Freedom of speech no longer allowed

Oath Keepers statement about video titled, “Government Agents Seize Oath Keeper’s New Born From Hospital”

Oath Keepers » Blog Archive » Oath Keepers statement about video titled, “Government Agents Seize Oath Keeper’s New Born From Hospital”

A little bit of a long read but was confirmed to be real. This means you can not have free speech, for fear of government retaliation. Everyone and I mean everyone needs to start flooding the offending agency with e-mails and letters and if you feel the need a donation to Oath Keepers to help with the legal issues.

__________________
opaww is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 10-08-2010, 05:53 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

Holy sh*t!

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2010, 06:41 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
amoroque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Monte Vista,CO
Posts: 1,231
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Wow! To take a child away from its parents at birth is not only a sad situation, it could possible be detrimental to the health of the child. I can't believe this is happening in the USA!?!?!

__________________

It's like paradise on Earth, enriched with the ever so sweet nectar of
elk urine.

When you're out there by yourself, you become who you really are.

amoroque is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2010, 02:43 PM   #4
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

According to Stewart's site, there were several serious allegations in the affidavit that led to them black-bagging the kid. Being associated with OK was one of many allegations, but it does paint the author(s) of the affidavit in an extremely bad light. First, OK is not a militia. Second, they wish to pledge their support to the rule of law. Neither of these should be considered problematic.

If the allegations are serious enough to take the child, did they also lock up both parents on criminal charges?

__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2010, 04:35 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,372
Liked 2120 Times on 1146 Posts
Likes Given: 3190

Default

Another catchy headline" ...Government takes Baby". Makes it sound like Obama ordered it done. Someone at OK convenienty failed to give the whole story. There is a history of domestic violence between Irish and his GF. According to folks in the comments section; Irish had a problem with police for carrying a concealed firearm.

I had to dig long and hard through the far out stuff to find a viable account of the incident. Pardon me but this reads an awful lot like a trailer park novel. There is a time to go to bat for someone when that person is wronged. IMO: Irish is not worth the effort.

State takes infant, spurs protest - Saturday, Oct. 9, 2010

Quote:
Taylor said she doesn't know why the agency states in court documents that she twice last year reported to a state social worker that Irish had hurt her and that she feared for her life because he had a gun.

.............................

Their battle with DCYF dates back to January of last year, Taylor said, when the state welfare agency took her other two children, boys who are now 2 and 3, for alleged abuse and neglect.

The boys currently live with a foster family, and Irish said he was told baby Cheyenne will go to live with the same family for now.

...................

Taylor said she is seeking a divorce from her sons' father, who lives in Seabrook. But because she is still married to him, DCYF considers her husband to be the "legal father" of baby Cheyenne, according to the affidavit.

Irish said hospital staff "refused" to put his name on the baby's birth certificate unless Stephanie's husband signed off on it.
__________________

Last edited by alsaqr; 10-09-2010 at 04:49 PM.
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2010, 04:50 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

Now that's a horse of a different color. Thanks for doing the digging Alsaqr.

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2010, 05:58 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: WNC
Posts: 397
Liked 136 Times on 65 Posts
Likes Given: 29

Default

Here's a video where Irish and the mother were told be LEO's not to enter the hospital or they would be charged with criminal trespassing.





Why would the State even list Irish's membership in the Oath Keepers or his buying guns in the first place?
__________________
Seven is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2010, 06:31 PM   #8
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,372
Liked 2120 Times on 1146 Posts
Likes Given: 3190

Default

Quote:
Why would the State even list Irish's membership in the Oath Keepers or his buying guns in the first place?
They most likely mentioned his buying of guns because the guy is a troublemaker of long standing. Irish has had runins with the law over guns.

Go to the link and read the comments from the locals of that area.

State takes infant, spurs protest - Saturday, Oct. 9, 2010

Quote:
My guess is that the concern about the ownership of guns is related to the history of Domestic Violence in this couple. According to the Motion for Venue Change (at the website referenced in earlier comments), Mr. Irish was court-ordered to complete a batterers intervention which he did not complete. When assessing for the risk of lethality (the risk of an abuser killing his/her partner) in a Domestic Violence situation, presence of weapons in the home is obviously one of the primary risk factors. According to the same document cited above, the police department has "responded to multiple calls which involved Mr. Irish and firearms, one of which resulted in a pending charge for possession of a concealed weapon without a permit." Obviously, we don't know what type of calls these were, but it shows that weapons are certainly available to Mr. Irish, and that he is not a responsible (law abiding) firearm owner. As I said, I'm a member of the NRA, but with this man's reported history, I take no issue with police/DCYF concern about his possession of weapons.
__________________
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2010, 06:40 PM   #9
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,363
Liked 1908 Times on 1103 Posts
Likes Given: 3902

Default

Here more information on this matter. Local news station is now on it.

Bomb-Sniffing Dogs Check Hospital During Protest - News Story - WMUR Manchester

Bomb-Sniffing Dogs Check Hospital During Protest

CONCORD, N.H. -- FBI bomb-sniffing dogs were at Concord Hospital on Friday after demonstrators gathered to protest a newborn being removed from her mother's care by the state.

The hospital said there was no threat made, but it was taking precautions in part to reassure staff and patients.

The child was taken by the Department of Children Youth and Families. The hospital said privacy laws prevent it from discussing the matter.

The FBI left the hospital without finding anything threatening, and the hospital said it is operating normally.

Stephanie Taylor said her infant daughter Cheyenne was taken into state custody. Taylor said she had two young sons removed from her care in 2009 due to abuse by a caretaker.

The father, Johnathon Irish, said court paperwork cited his involvement with an organization called the Oath Keepers, dedicated to defending the constitution.

While state officials cannot talk about this case, Lorraine Bartlett with the Division For Children Youth And Families said a child cannot be removed based on a parent's affiliation with an organization.

__________________
Bigcountry02 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2010, 05:33 AM   #10
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,363
Liked 1908 Times on 1103 Posts
Likes Given: 3902

Default

Update from infowars, MSM is not saying a word! There is a 14:52 minute video.

Irish Family Baby Returned

Jonathan Irish appeared on the Alex Jones Show this evening and said his infant daughter, Cheyenne, was returned to him and his fiancé, Stephanie Taylor. The state of New Hampshire, citing neglect, had abducted the newborn at the Concord Hospital.

Irish expressed his gratitude for the return of his daughter but said he was not at liberty to divulge details on the release due to a court gag order.

Irish told Alex Jones that his name was confused with that of another man with a similar name. The second man apparently has a record of domestic abuse and violence.

A court affidavit stated Jonathan Irish’s association with the Oath Keepers as one of the primary reasons the child was taken. “The Division became aware and confirmed that Mr. Irish associated with a militia known as the Oath Keepers and had purchased several different types of weapons, including a rifle, handgun and taser,” the affidavit states.

The Oath Keepers was founded in March of 2009 in in Lexington, Massachusetts. The nonprofit organization advocates that its members, who are current and former U.S. military and law enforcement officers, uphold the Constitution of the United States should they be ordered to violate it. The Oath Keepers organization is not a militia as the court affidavit and corporate media insist.

After Cheyenne was abducted by New Hampshire’s Division of Children, Youth and Families, authorities prevented Jonathon Irish from seeing his child. Authorities cited “security threats” as the reason for blocking visitation without explaining precisely what those threats were. Irish, his fiancé Stephanie and Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes appeared on the Alex Jones Show on October 11 to discuss this violation of basic visitation rights.

On Friday, October 8, the FBI sent bomb-sniffing dogs into Concord Hospital to intimidate people who had gathered to protest against the snatching of a baby by the DCYF.

On October 13, Stephanie Taylor voiced concerns when she discovered blood in her baby’s diaper during a supervised visit at the at a Strafford County administration building. After authorities determined there was “no indication of any abuse,” the child was returned to foster care.

Will Bunch, writing for the Soros funded Media Matters for America, led a corporate media campaign to demonize Irish and characterize as a “bizarre right-wing campaign” the effort to have the child returned to its parents. Bunch writes that “the evidence is overwhelming that the girl was taken from Irish and the mother Stephanie Taylor at the hospital for the only reason that the government should take that extreme step: To ensure the safety of an otherwise helpless child.”

Bunch’s assertion that CPS agencies protect children is at odds with the record. As the late Nancy Schaefer has documented, “child protection services” around the country have a record corruption and are often detrimental to the health and well-being of children. CPS agencies often act as legalized kidnapping services.

Now that the court has admitted that the child was taken in error and Jonathan Bunch is in fact not an abusive father and the authorities had either confused or deliberately associated Irish with the behavior of another individual, Mr. Bunch and Media Matters should immediately apologize for slandering Irish, Taylor, and Alex Jones.

Media Matters, however, will likely not apologize or set the record straight because this obviously conflicts with its agenda to demonize the growing patriot movement and portray constitutionalist groups like Oath Keepers as paranoid right-wing extremists.

__________________
Bigcountry02 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Knobcreek gun show in october LONGHAIR General Handgun Discussion 17 10-05-2011 01:30 AM
Glock 19 Range Report October 2010 indyfan Glock Forum 13 12-18-2010 03:47 AM
Link to Sarah Palin speech TEA Party speech Last Crow Politics, Religion and Controversy 13 02-08-2010 04:14 PM
From the Shooting Wire for Monday, October 19 canebrake AR-15 Discussion 3 10-19-2009 04:42 PM
Free Speech - Obama order worries speech groups Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 6 03-30-2009 07:37 PM