This is not 1994 - Page 2


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > This is not 1994

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2013, 03:48 PM   #11
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,218
Liked 6572 Times on 3661 Posts
Likes Given: 6214

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HockaLouis View Post
Hey, com'on man, there's no need for that. They may be slimy, disgusting, and have set civilization back, but at least plague-carrying rats are one of God's creatures too!
DemocRATS carry the worst of all plagues. Liberslism.


locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 12:45 AM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 614
Liked 325 Times on 194 Posts
Likes Given: 517

Default

I agree with CrazedJava. There are many more gun owners now than there were in 94. Plus the new proposals are much more draconian than the 94 AWB. I an cautiously optomistic that these proposals will not pass.

However, that being said this is certainly not the time to be complacent. We need to keep a keen eye on what is coming out of the antis camp and be prepared to respond immediately. Heaven knows that I have been wrong before.

__________________
Warrior1256 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Tell me about the weapons ban of 1994 70cuda383 Legal and Activism 9 12-22-2012 08:39 PM
Romney and the 1994 milk gaffe downsouth Politics, Religion and Controversy 8 09-13-2012 08:39 PM
I need info on this Centennial 1894-1994 30/30 crazyman24 General Rifle Discussion 3 08-09-2011 06:27 PM