The next move of the gun grabbers
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > The next move of the gun grabbers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-19-2013, 01:56 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
molonlabexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 975
Liked 367 Times on 234 Posts
Likes Given: 157

Default The next move of the gun grabbers

One thing is for certain, there is a freight training coming for our guns, it’s time to derail it… [LINK]
__________________
NRA member. Gun owner. From my cold, dead hands...


Haven't got a lot, I don't need a lot. Coffee's only a dime. Living in the sunlight, Loving in the moonlight, Having a wonderful time!


I CAME, I SAW, I CONQUERED...
molonlabexx is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 04-19-2013, 02:16 AM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
gr8oldguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 957
Liked 572 Times on 333 Posts
Likes Given: 176

Default

Who exactly is coming to get my guns? I hope they wait until next week because I just picked a new one up today and I'd like to get a chance to shoot it a couple of times before "they" take it away.

__________________

You don't have to remember the truth
NRA Member

gr8oldguy is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 02:20 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
molonlabexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 975
Liked 367 Times on 234 Posts
Likes Given: 157

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gr8oldguy View Post
Who exactly is coming to get my guns? I hope they wait until next week because I just picked a new one up today and I'd like to get a chance to shoot it a couple of times before "they" take it away.
The "Yea" section of this list...
__________________
NRA member. Gun owner. From my cold, dead hands...


Haven't got a lot, I don't need a lot. Coffee's only a dime. Living in the sunlight, Loving in the moonlight, Having a wonderful time!


I CAME, I SAW, I CONQUERED...
molonlabexx is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 02:34 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Rocky7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Red Deer,Alberta
Posts: 1,409
Liked 1396 Times on 730 Posts
Likes Given: 1932

Default

It won't take months and it won't need much momentum, IMO.

It will come soon in both our countries and it will be called the Arms Trade Treaty.

Even before his most ambitious gun-control proposals were falling by the
wayside, President Obama was turning for help to the United Nations. On
April 2, the United States led 154 nations to approve the Arms Trade Treaty
in the U.N. General Assembly. While much of the treaty governs the
international sale of conventional weapons, its regulation of small arms
would provide American gun-control advocates with a new tool for restricting
rights. Yet because the Constitution requires that two-thirds of the Senate
give its advice and consent to any treaty, Second Amendment supporters still
have a political route to stop the administration.

Like many international schemes, this treaty has seemingly benign motives.
It seeks to "eradicate the illicit trade in conventional arms and to prevent
their diversion to the illicit market," where they are used in civil wars
and human-rights disasters. The treaty calls for rigorous export controls on
heavy conventional weapons, such as tanks, missiles, artillery, helicopters
and warships. Yet, as with many utopian devices, the treaty fails the test
of enforcement. Some of the world's largest arms traffickers either voted
against the agreement or abstained. The U.S., quite rightly, already has the
world's most serious export controls in place, while nations such as North
Korea, Syria, Iran, Russia and China will continue to traffic in arms with
abandon.

But the new treaty also demands domestic regulation of "small arms and light
weapons." The treaty's Article 5 requires nations to "establish and maintain
a national control system," including a "national control list." Article 10
requires signatories "to regulate brokering" of conventional arms. The
treaty offers no guarantee for individual rights, but instead only declares
it is "mindful" of the "legitimate trade and lawful ownership" of arms for
"recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities." Not a word
about the right to possess guns for a broader individual right of
self-defense.

Gun-control advocates will use these provisions to argue that the U.S. must
enact measures such as a national gun registry, licenses for guns and
ammunition sales, universal background checks, and even a ban of certain
weapons. The treaty thus provides the Obama administration with an end-run
around Congress to reach these gun-control holy grails. As the Supreme
Court's Heller and McDonald cases recently declared, the Second Amendment
guarantees an individual right "to keep and bear Arms" such as handguns and
rifles. Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce remains broad, but
the court's decisions in other cases-even last year's challenge to the
Affordable Care Act-remind us that those powers are limited.

International treaties don't suffer these limits............


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324504704578413110123095782.html

__________________

C.S.S.A.; N.F.A.; N.R.A. Life Member
Make the world a better place; have your liberal spayed or neutered.

Rocky7 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 02:37 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
molonlabexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 975
Liked 367 Times on 234 Posts
Likes Given: 157

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocky7 View Post
It won't take months and it won't need much momentum, IMO.

It will come soon in both our countries and it will be called the Arms Trade Treaty.

Even before his most ambitious gun-control proposals were falling by the
wayside, President Obama was turning for help to the United Nations. On
April 2, the United States led 154 nations to approve the Arms Trade Treaty
in the U.N. General Assembly. While much of the treaty governs the
international sale of conventional weapons, its regulation of small arms
would provide American gun-control advocates with a new tool for restricting
rights. Yet because the Constitution requires that two-thirds of the Senate
give its advice and consent to any treaty, Second Amendment supporters still
have a political route to stop the administration.

Like many international schemes, this treaty has seemingly benign motives.
It seeks to "eradicate the illicit trade in conventional arms and to prevent
their diversion to the illicit market," where they are used in civil wars
and human-rights disasters. The treaty calls for rigorous export controls on
heavy conventional weapons, such as tanks, missiles, artillery, helicopters
and warships. Yet, as with many utopian devices, the treaty fails the test
of enforcement. Some of the world's largest arms traffickers either voted
against the agreement or abstained. The U.S., quite rightly, already has the
world's most serious export controls in place, while nations such as North
Korea, Syria, Iran, Russia and China will continue to traffic in arms with
abandon.

But the new treaty also demands domestic regulation of "small arms and light
weapons." The treaty's Article 5 requires nations to "establish and maintain
a national control system," including a "national control list." Article 10
requires signatories "to regulate brokering" of conventional arms. The
treaty offers no guarantee for individual rights, but instead only declares
it is "mindful" of the "legitimate trade and lawful ownership" of arms for
"recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities." Not a word
about the right to possess guns for a broader individual right of
self-defense.

Gun-control advocates will use these provisions to argue that the U.S. must
enact measures such as a national gun registry, licenses for guns and
ammunition sales, universal background checks, and even a ban of certain
weapons. The treaty thus provides the Obama administration with an end-run
around Congress to reach these gun-control holy grails. As the Supreme
Court's Heller and McDonald cases recently declared, the Second Amendment
guarantees an individual right "to keep and bear Arms" such as handguns and
rifles. Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce remains broad, but
the court's decisions in other cases-even last year's challenge to the
Affordable Care Act-remind us that those powers are limited.

International treaties don't suffer these limits............


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324504704578413110123095782.html
Yeah the UN is pretty much the foundation of a one world order.
__________________
NRA member. Gun owner. From my cold, dead hands...


Haven't got a lot, I don't need a lot. Coffee's only a dime. Living in the sunlight, Loving in the moonlight, Having a wonderful time!


I CAME, I SAW, I CONQUERED...
molonlabexx is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 02:38 AM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
gr8oldguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 957
Liked 572 Times on 333 Posts
Likes Given: 176

Default

Now I'm scared.

__________________

You don't have to remember the truth
NRA Member

gr8oldguy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 03:10 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
molonlabexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 975
Liked 367 Times on 234 Posts
Likes Given: 157

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gr8oldguy View Post
Now I'm scared.
About what?
__________________
NRA member. Gun owner. From my cold, dead hands...


Haven't got a lot, I don't need a lot. Coffee's only a dime. Living in the sunlight, Loving in the moonlight, Having a wonderful time!


I CAME, I SAW, I CONQUERED...
molonlabexx is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 04:09 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sputnik1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 2,877
Liked 712 Times on 463 Posts
Likes Given: 1949

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gr8oldguy View Post
Now I'm scared.
Nothing to be scared of, this is nothing new, 'they' have been after our guns for 100 years, nothing has changed.

They wont ever stop either, so its up to us to either let it happen, or support our pro gun groups and remind those who betray us that we run the ballot box. There will always be those who wish to take our God given rights, we cant stop that, but we can be stronger than they are.

We cant just continue this defense of our remaining rights, its time to take the fight to them and reinstate the rights that have been taken from us. As long as we 'hold our ground' they will periodically gain ground on us, we have to take ground from them and let it be known, that they can't trample us as they have done for so long


It's time to take our rights back and I think this reciprocal concealed carry and GFZs (thanks 95sniper) are a good places to start.
__________________
Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid. - John Wayne

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Last edited by sputnik1988; 04-19-2013 at 04:23 AM.
sputnik1988 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 04:13 AM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 820
Liked 156 Times on 115 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Sorry, wierd double post.

__________________

Last edited by 95sniper; 04-19-2013 at 04:15 AM.
95sniper is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 04:13 AM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 820
Liked 156 Times on 115 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik1988 View Post

Nothing to be scared of, this is nothing new, 'they' have been after our guns for 100 years, nothing has changed.

They wont ever stop either, so its up to us to either let it happen, or support or pro gun groups and remind those who betray us that we run the ballot box. There will always be those who wish to take our God given rights, we cant stop that, but we can be stronger than they are.

We cant just continue this defense of our remaining rights, its time to take the fight to them and reinstate the rights that have been taken from us. As long as we 'hold or ground' they will periodically gain ground on us, we have to take ground from them and let it be known, that they can't trample us as they have done for so long

It's time to take our rights back, I think this reciprocal concealed carry is a good place to start.
And gun free zones. It makes me sick to hear people say that they would rather give away our rights to be "safer" it really makes no sense.
__________________
95sniper is offline  
sputnik1988 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Do Gun Grabbers want regulation or this? Wiebelhaus Politics, Religion and Controversy 11 04-09-2013 04:01 AM
Oh those crazy gun grabbers! vincent Firearms in the Media 13 04-06-2013 07:46 PM
The new tactic of the gun grabbers molonlabexx Legal and Activism 2 04-03-2013 02:21 PM
Founding Fathers Battle Gun Grabbers From the Grave Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 0 01-23-2013 05:26 AM
Part II A Quick & Dirty Guide to put Gun Grabbers In their Place Daoust_Nat The Club House 0 01-18-2013 12:24 AM