 |
|
01-21-2013, 11:39 AM
|
#11
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,650
Liked 336 Times on 257 Posts
Likes Given: 34
|
Actually the fact that they failed to exclude law enforcement is a good thing. It will most likely make them revisit this law.
Otherwise it would be nice to see law enforcement unions shut down and let them see what it is like with citizens in the vulnerable position they left them in along with the upper hand they gave to criminals.
|
|
|
|
01-21-2013, 02:09 PM
|
#12
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 109
Liked 61 Times on 32 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JonM
the police in new york shouldnt have guns. the private citizens cant have em neither should they. the politicians, entertainers, leftists etc who all have bodyguards should have unarmed body guards.
|
Hear hear! I agree! If laws on paper stop criminals and make it all safe and cozy, no one needs guns anymore. We can all relax, drink free bubble up, eat rainbow stew, with a silver spoon, underneath those sky's of blue!
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2013, 02:44 PM
|
#13
|
|
May you live in interesting times...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,242
Liked 3543 Times on 1690 Posts
Likes Given: 580
|
LOL!!! Stupid New York...gave the criminals 60 days to comply with the law, but made the law abiding citizens comply instantly....
That's not a joke either. They gave the criminals a 60 day amnesty...
__________________
America has fought wars across the globe, because we kept our firearms while others let dictators take theirs...
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2013, 02:52 PM
|
#14
|
|
I'd rather my own son see me die on my feet as a free man, than watch him go, broken, into slavery.
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 13,919
Liked 4169 Times on 2519 Posts
Likes Given: 46
|
I did actually see something in there I liked.
Safe storage. If you live with a convicted felon, you can still own guns as long as you comply with their safe storage laws. In most places you have to choose between the felon and your own rights.
__________________
Come if you must, but only if you must. For the day you find yourself upon my step, will surely be the night you find peace along Jordan's edge.
I firmly believe that any man's finest hour, the greatest fulfillement of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause, and lies exhausted on the field of battle... Victorious.
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2013, 03:14 PM
|
#15
|
|
May you live in interesting times...
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,242
Liked 3543 Times on 1690 Posts
Likes Given: 580
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trip286
I did actually see something in there I liked.
Safe storage. If you live with a convicted felon, you can still own guns as long as you comply with their safe storage laws. In most places you have to choose between the felon and your own rights.
|
I knew a girl that got busted for pot with her boyfriend, because of the amount, they were both convicted of a felony. She had to marry him, as North Carolina (or south Carolina) wouldn't let two felons live together. She ended up hating the guy later on...
__________________
America has fought wars across the globe, because we kept our firearms while others let dictators take theirs...
|
|
|
|
|
03-21-2013, 05:23 PM
|
#16
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1
|
I'm new to this forum, but I figure this is a good place for this question.
As we know the NY SAFE act further restricts the definition of a assault weapon from 2 or more banned features down to one or more. I'm sure on this forum there is no need to list them. So the question is, any AR-15 is now a "banned" assault weapon because of the pistol grip, so what keeps you from changing the upper to one that contained a flash suppressor and bayonet lug?
It's already "banned" because of the one feature, what is going to be now, more banned with 3 or 4?
I'm curious on others thoughts, is that a legit loophole or not? According to the SAFE FAQ website it seems so.
Of course you really need a lawyer to read the full SAFE act legislation for a legally correct answer, but I'm just curious on opinions.
Last edited by Magooch; 03-21-2013 at 05:41 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
03-21-2013, 10:55 PM
|
#17
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Washington State
Posts: 78
Liked 52 Times on 26 Posts
Likes Given: 9
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magooch
I'm new to this forum, but I figure this is a good place for this question.
As we know the NY SAFE act further restricts the definition of a assault weapon from 2 or more banned features down to one or more. I'm sure on this forum there is no need to list them. So the question is, any AR-15 is now a "banned" assault weapon because of the pistol grip, so what keeps you from changing the upper to one that contained a flash suppressor and bayonet lug?
It's already "banned" because of the one feature, what is going to be now, more banned with 3 or 4?
I'm curious on others thoughts, is that a legit loophole or not? According to the SAFE FAQ website it seems so.
Of course you really need a lawyer to read the full SAFE act legislation for a legally correct answer, but I'm just curious on opinions.
|
Hi and welcome to the fourm, you should stop by the intro fourm and say hi.
For your question I think We'll see how it pans out in Ny, where's one for you on the limit issue. How about 7 in the magazine and 3 in the perp? 
Last edited by JAD; 03-21-2013 at 11:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Firearms Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Police state New York City
|
KalashnikovJosh |
Politics, Religion and Controversy |
17 |
08-10-2012 11:43 PM |
|
new york state compliancy
|
wrightbuiltarmory |
Gunsmithing Forum |
4 |
07-03-2012 12:19 PM |
|
|
|
