From the mouth of the beast its self: we will ban your firearms if reelected - Page 10
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

From the mouth of the beast its self: we will ban your firearms if reelected


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-08-2012, 03:53 AM   #91
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1176 Times on 511 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

My final words on the subject.

From the mouth of the beast its self:  we will ban your firearms if reelected - Legal and Activism
__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
5
People Like This 
Old 09-08-2012, 07:38 PM   #92
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,698
Liked 2611 Times on 1484 Posts
Likes Given: 2004

Default

I really think the DNC needs to make Eric Holder the

posterboy-oops!- posterMAN for " Transparency in

Government".

...talk about" undercover brother".
therewolf is offline  
2
People Like This 
Old 09-09-2012, 03:34 AM   #93
I used to play keyboards, but now ...
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Balota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Glenpool, Oklahoma
Posts: 4,413
Liked 3229 Times on 1949 Posts
Likes Given: 3096

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow View Post
It's nice and convenient to blame Obama for Fast and Furious. But so far, he had no knowledge of fast and furious. For all we know fast and furious could have been cooked up by the republicans to embarrass Obama. We may never know what the real motive behind fast and furious might have been.

I can tell you how fast and furious is going to end up. Some underlings are going to take the blame for fast and furious. Their grandchildren will live very well for their sacrifice. Then fast and furious will be swept under the rug like weed ashes in a frat house.

I trust a crack head on the corner more than I trust Obama or Romney, all three are evil. The only difference is the crackhead can't see past $60 or whatever it costs to buy enough crack to catch a buzz.
You have got to be kidding. Obama had no knowledge of F&F. Right. Let's just pretend that was true when F&F hit the news. It certainly was not true when Obama used an executive order to tell Congress to go to hell with their subpoena. Obama knew all about it by then. If the documents that are being demanded are classified, there are Congressional leaders of important committees who have such clearances and could review them. Obama is stonewalling because those documents would incriminate HIM as well as Holder.

We can only hope that (a) Romney wins, (b) F&F gets investigated with full access to the essential documents, and (c) parties responsible (should be Obama and Holder as a minimum) are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Arguably, what they did could be treason. Fullest extent.
__________________
Balota
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
Practice does NOT make perfect. Practice makes permanent. Only perfect practice makes perfect.
Balota is online now  
2
People Like This 
Old 09-09-2012, 11:00 AM   #94
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: \
Posts: 990
Liked 134 Times on 109 Posts
Likes Given: 43

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balota View Post
You have got to be kidding. Obama had no knowledge of F&F. Right. Let's just pretend that was true when F&F hit the news. It certainly was not true when Obama used an executive order to tell Congress to go to hell with their subpoena. Obama knew all about it by then. If the documents that are being demanded are classified, there are Congressional leaders of important committees who have such clearances and could review them. Obama is stonewalling because those documents would incriminate HIM as well as Holder.

We can only hope that (a) Romney wins, (b) F&F gets investigated with full access to the essential documents, and (c) parties responsible (should be Obama and Holder as a minimum) are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Arguably, what they did could be treason. Fullest extent.
What ever!
Old_Crow is offline  
 
Old 09-09-2012, 11:12 AM   #95
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow View Post
It's nice and convenient to blame Obama for Fast and Furious. But so far, he had no knowledge of fast and furious.
We know Holder knew about it. If Obama didn't know what his subordinate was doing, particularly when it involves weapons being transported to another country without that nation's leaders knowing about it, there's a problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow View Post
For all we know fast and furious could have been cooked up by the republicans to embarrass Obama.
I'm guessing by that statement that you're not keeping up with F&F too much. There's a huge amount of evidence provided by Holder and his people that corroborates what the whistle-blowers have said.

You don't get held in contempt of Congress for frivolous reasons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow View Post
We may never know what the real motive behind fast and furious might have been.
That's very possible. But we know for certain it had nothing to do with tracking down drug cartel BGs, and Issa has emails between people discussing how to use the violence from F&F as a precedent for tougher gun legislation in the US. That, combined with the shrill commentary by Hillary and others back in 2009/2010 lying about the number of guns recovered in Mexico being mostly from the US, and the ATF trying to require gun stores in border states to make a special report of anyone buying more than one long gun a week, all suggest the real motive is tougher gun laws.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow View Post
I can tell you how fast and furious is going to end up. Some underlings are going to take the blame for fast and furious. Their grandchildren will live very well for their sacrifice. Then fast and furious will be swept under the rug like weed ashes in a frat house.
Unfortunately, you're probably right.
bkt is offline  
dog2000tj Likes This 
Old 09-10-2012, 05:43 AM   #96
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: \
Posts: 990
Liked 134 Times on 109 Posts
Likes Given: 43

Default

@BKT I really don't care what you think. I am so tired of hearing about F&F that I could puke. So, no, I am not keeping up with it. Go pick on someone else.

The only news sources that are reporting F&F have about the same reputation as Nancy Grace. Unless you have connections in the CIA you know no more about F&F than the mule in my barn. There is no way to do any fact checking. The documents have been sealed. Right or wrong Obama made sure all we could do is guess. He might actually be protecting the families of the agents involved in F&F. The cartels see killing a Federal agents family in the same light as we do shooting a coyote.

Last edited by Old_Crow; 09-10-2012 at 06:13 AM.
Old_Crow is offline  
 
Old 09-10-2012, 09:41 AM   #97
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow View Post
@BKT I really don't care what you think. I am so tired of hearing about F&F that I could puke. So, no, I am not keeping up with it. Go pick on someone else.

The only news sources that are reporting F&F have about the same reputation as Nancy Grace. Unless you have connections in the CIA you know no more about F&F than the mule in my barn. There is no way to do any fact checking. The documents have been sealed. Right or wrong Obama made sure all we could do is guess. He might actually be protecting the families of the agents involved in F&F. The cartels see killing a Federal agents family in the same light as we do shooting a coyote.
Respectfully, I have not gotten any information from the mainstream news media on this subject because they are working overtime to squelch it.

David Codrea's Gun Rights Examiner and Mike Vanderboegh's Sipsey Street Irregulars are two blogs that broke the story well over a year ago. Both David and Mike have contacts within the ATF, and it was they who connected the whistle-blowers to Grassley and Issa. The information they have amassed and the leg-work they have done dwarfs anything so-called "professional" journalists have done. Both of these gentlemen have testified before congress on the matter.

We can't prove who knew what when unless we see some proof. What Issa has been trying to do is get documentation from the DoJ that might help shine a light on things. That Obama nixed that effort is not condemning in and of itself but it is suspicious.

If you're not familiar with what has been discovered so far and you wish to remain that way, that's fine. But don't make an assertion that is unprovable (you can't prove a negative) and don't jump on people who might have read a little more than you have on the subject.
bkt is offline  
 
Old 09-10-2012, 10:48 AM   #98
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: \
Posts: 990
Liked 134 Times on 109 Posts
Likes Given: 43

Default

I don't try to put words in your mouth. If my opinion offends you so you know where the ban button is at. I don't pick your posts apart whether I agree or disagree. All I see is someone who is drunk on a tiny bit of power and is now abusing it. You are clearly not interested in civil discourse. Whatever is on your mind just go on and do it. My life will not change and neither will yours.
Old_Crow is offline  
 
Old 09-10-2012, 10:50 AM   #99
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 461
Liked 114 Times on 88 Posts
Likes Given: 114

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow View Post
The only reason I don't see Obama as a threat he lacks the political skills to accomplish anything on his agenda.
.
So you are saying OB is naive and not politically savvy.
Yet he passed his favorite massive bill, Obamacare. Moved massive money -approaching a trillion dollars - from Medicare to pay for Obamacare, passed two rounds of Massive spending programs increasing the national debt more than at anytime in the country's history, shut down oil production in the Gulf, stopped the Canadian pipeline to the US. And he can't get things that he wants passed - you say??
He's got nearly 50% of the population not paying any tax at all - who do you think those people are going to vote for??
His personal background is filled with lifelong friends and advisors who are thugs, criminals, terrorists, racist hate preachers and jailbirds.
And he has spent millions carefully covering the secret of his actual birthplace. Why would someone work so at not revealing something unless there was something that he did not want revealed? He just throws snide jokes at the questions.

And you are saying he is naive and politically not savvy enough to get his agenda through? Where is your head? Look at what he has already done!

The country is on the verge of unsustainable debt - which can ruin all of our futures with massive economic disruptions - as in the other liberal socialist states gone bad - Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, France, ... rioting in the streets there!
What are you thinking, man! ........ Or not thinking!!
Colby is offline  
CA357 Likes This 
Old 09-10-2012, 12:40 PM   #100
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
PrimePorkchop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Urbana,Illinois
Posts: 1,748
Liked 991 Times on 499 Posts
Likes Given: 2547

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow
I don't try to put words in your mouth. If my opinion offends you so you know where the ban button is at. I don't pick your posts apart whether I agree or disagree. All I see is someone who is drunk on a tiny bit of power and is now abusing it. You are clearly not interested in civil discourse. Whatever is on your mind just go on and do it. My life will not change and neither will yours.
Soooooo what youre saying is "leave me to my opinions and don't prove to me where im wrong"

The Internet is the wrong place for an attitude like that, I'm afraid. If you want to post your opinions in a political forum, expect people to disagree

If you post an opinion that you know little about, expect to be proven wrong

You speak of civil discourse but then make a post like that... Wow

And the "drunken mod on a power trip thing". ... Really? Did you really just do that???
__________________
VICTORY IS OURS
Because of members of THIS FORUM - Bass Pro Shops have reversed their anti-2nd Amendment policies on ammunition sales in the State of Illinois
PrimePorkchop is offline  
TWMIM Likes This 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
The Beast is here Ranger-6 Politics, Religion and Controversy 16 05-18-2012 08:05 PM
Meet the Beast! VIDEO Amsdorf Semi-Auto Handguns 2 04-06-2012 07:55 PM
Are you Beast enough?? JonM The Club House 5 07-18-2011 02:32 PM
Mark of the Beast Benning Boy The Club House 6 04-16-2011 12:37 AM



Newest Threads