Massive Firearms Ban Bill introduced in the House on 1 Aug 2013.
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Massive Firearms Ban Bill introduced in the House on 1 Aug 2013.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-07-2013, 06:30 PM   #1
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,363
Liked 1908 Times on 1103 Posts
Likes Given: 3902

Default Massive Firearms Ban Bill introduced in the House on 1 Aug 2013.

Found on another forum, Rep Waxman (Commie Rat)



http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th/house-bill/2910/

Let me start with this: there’s no chance in hell that this bill will pass.

H.R. 2910 is a House bill, meaning that the Republican controlled legislative body would need to approve it before it gets its day in the Senate:

http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Bill-Text-HR-2910-Gun-Violence-Prevention-and-Reduction-Act-2013-8-1.pdf

The only way that would happen is if almost every House Republican found themselves incapacitated simultaneously. Somehow.

Nevertheless, it’s some scary stuff, and exactly what you’d expect from a California Democrat making a grandstand play . . .


Here are the highlights:

1. “Assault weapons” receivers would be labeled as “hazardous products”
2. Non-complete lower receivers (blanks, sheets, 80% lowers and the like) for “assault weapons” would be banned from sale
3. ANY INDIVIDUAL PARTS for an AR-15 would be BANNED from sale, including upper receiver groups, bolt carrier groups, and the like.
4. Uses a “single feature” test for defining “assault weapons”
5. Eliminates the ban on using federal funds for gun control advocacy
6. The biggest thing here is that the bill seeks to make it illegal to sell any parts (single parts or kits, either one) that can be used to construct an “assault weapon.” That means upper receiver groups would be illegal without a registered lower receiver attached and logged in the bound books of manufacturers and subject to ATF inspection.

__________________

Last edited by Bigcountry02; 08-07-2013 at 08:23 PM. Reason: Spelling in title
Bigcountry02 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 08-07-2013, 06:35 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JW357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,724
Liked 3726 Times on 2283 Posts
Likes Given: 1224

Default

How reputable are these sources?
__________________

Always have clean socks.

JW357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 06:39 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Reno,Texas
Posts: 10,211
Liked 6563 Times on 3635 Posts
Likes Given: 27929

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JW357 View Post
How reputable are these sources?
What do you mean? Both are .gov sites.


Start writing your reps.
__________________

Last edited by texaswoodworker; 08-07-2013 at 06:52 PM.
texaswoodworker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 06:48 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5732 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

That can't be a real photo; did they touch that up? I have to wonder, were both his parents that ugly, or did somebody have the beer goggles on?

I mean just...damn that is an ugly human. I doubt a bear would get that hungry. whoo!

__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
8
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 07:03 PM   #5
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,363
Liked 1908 Times on 1103 Posts
Likes Given: 3902

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by orangello View Post
That can't be a real photo; did they touch that up? I have to wonder, were both his parents that ugly, or did somebody have the beer goggles on?

I mean just...damn that is an ugly human. I doubt a bear would get that hungry. whoo!
The poor bear would prefer to starve that risk that pain and suffering!

Here is the .gov site:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c113:H.R.2910:

Not sure if the photo is doctored, did not care. It fit the commie-rat wording!
__________________
Bigcountry02 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 07:19 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JW357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,724
Liked 3726 Times on 2283 Posts
Likes Given: 1224

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texaswoodworker

What do you mean? Both are .gov sites.

Start writing your reps.
You're right. Didn't notice. Thanks.
__________________

Always have clean socks.

JW357 is offline  
texaswoodworker Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 07:21 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,170
Liked 5732 Times on 3358 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

http://waxman.house.gov/about-me

Holy crap! I think the pic was for real.
__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
MisterMcCool Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 07:25 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Now residing in Lower Alabama
Posts: 283
Liked 117 Times on 83 Posts
Likes Given: 142

Default

Now we all know what a "pimple on the a$$ of humanity" looks like!

__________________
Mouser is offline  
Airborne1 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 07:31 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
davva360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 378
Liked 144 Times on 80 Posts
Likes Given: 41

Default

A face only a mother could love. When are the Kalifornians gonna realize the rest of the country does not want to be like them? They screwed up their own state, leave the rest of us alone.

__________________
davva360 is offline  
6
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2013, 07:35 PM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JW357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,724
Liked 3726 Times on 2283 Posts
Likes Given: 1224

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davva360
A face only a mother could love. When are the Kalifornians gonna realize the rest of the country does not want to be like them? They screwed up their own state, leave the rest of us alone.
I wish they could themselves alone!

-In Kalifornia
__________________

Always have clean socks.

JW357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Colorado: This Sessionís Most Unconstitutional Bill to be Introduced Tomorrow Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 17 04-07-2013 11:28 PM
Oregon - Massive Gun Ban Introduced Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 33 03-07-2013 03:37 AM
Minnesota Residents Time To Fight (N.Y. Bill Introduced) Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 11 02-08-2013 01:33 PM
So feinsteins AWB bill was introduced today but Gh0zt36 Politics, Religion and Controversy 10 01-25-2013 05:31 AM
Bi-Partisan Bill Introduced, H.R. 6691 Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 08-07-2008 09:46 PM