Maryland Law Unconstitutional


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Maryland Law Unconstitutional

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2012, 12:02 AM   #1
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default Maryland Law Unconstitutional

"A citizen may not be required to offer a 'good and substantial reason' why he should be permitted to exercise his rights," Legg wrote. "The right's existence is all the reason he needs."

Yeah, that.

Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good reason,' rules Maryland law unconstitutional


__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 03-06-2012, 01:33 AM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Gatoragn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North GA. Back home in Dixieland.
Posts: 3,526
Liked 1262 Times on 709 Posts
Likes Given: 534

Default

I saw this earlier on Foxnews.com.

Great news for the 2A and its supporters.



__________________
Gatoragn is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 02:02 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Default

So do you think it will carry any weight in California?

__________________
calgunbud is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 02:49 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Jpyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,832
Liked 776 Times on 449 Posts
Likes Given: 492

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkt View Post
"A citizen may not be required to offer a 'good and substantial reason' why he should be permitted to exercise his rights," Legg wrote. "The right's existence is all the reason he needs."

Yeah, that.

Federal judge says gun owners need not provide 'good reason,' rules Maryland law unconstitutional
The story at the link is a grammatical trainwreck...is this an ownership issue or a "shall issue" determination. The story switches between requiring a permit to own a hand gun and renewing an already issued permit to carry.
__________________

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

Jpyle is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Obama Care Ruled Unconstitutional dunerunner Legal and Activism 20 02-08-2011 06:36 AM
War Memorial "Unconstitutional" falseharmonix Politics, Religion and Controversy 4 01-05-2011 02:09 PM
CC ban unconstitutional says judge bkt Legal and Activism 16 10-26-2010 10:36 PM
Prop 8 Unconstitutional gregs887 Politics, Religion and Controversy 125 08-16-2010 05:11 PM