Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > LEO Unions... Why don't they oppose Gun Control?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2013, 07:42 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Tackleberry1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 5,284
Liked 3713 Times on 1831 Posts
Likes Given: 1010

Default LEO Unions... Why don't they oppose Gun Control?

Honest question and please, no Cop bashing.

We've seen hundreds of County Sherrif's state that they will NOT enforce Federal Gun Bans with some going so far as to state that they would arrest and charge any other State or Federal Officers who attempted enforcement within their jurisdiction.

We understand the difference between an elected LEO being able to speak his mind openly and "politically appointed" LEO's like City Chiefs and the Heads of State Police basically taking whatever position their Mayor or Governor dictate.

My question, and one I believe merits discussion, is that IF the majority of Rank and File officers oppose gun control, and IF they fear speaking out against their Chief's, they WHY are they not using their Unions to speak on their behalf?

Sure, most Unions are corrupt and only interested in policies that increase their "dues paying" membership... and if we all know that gun bans lead to more crime and more violence then it would make sence for Unions to deduce that a ban will eventually equal more officers as public safety budgets increase in response to the increased chaos.

However... I can't imagine that those already in uniform would choose to embrace policies of a downward spiral into chaos and ultimately a total police state? Nor can I imagine that none of them see the inherent risk of policies that threaten to put them at odds with law abiding, or "formerly" law abiding citizens who would choose non compliance.

We've all seen LEO Unions issue votes of NO confidence in Chiefs who failed to support them through either poor leadership or for political reasons.

So... When we see an Ass Hat like the CA Chief who last week claimed that firearms have no legitimate defensive use I have to wonder why his officers, through their Union Rep's are not expressing their disagreement?

Again, my objective with this dialogue is to help the cause by getting LEO Unions into the discussion by helping them understand that a conflict with gun owners does NOT serve their purpose, does NOT enhance public safety, but could certainly increase their officers exposure to risk on a daily basis.

If GENERAL MOTORS announced a new product that greatly increased the risk of on the job injuries to UAW members, we know the UAW would be screaming to high heaven in a loud and public manner... So I simply don't understand why LEO Unions are not doing the same for their membership.

Tack



__________________
Tackleberry1 is online now  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-26-2013, 07:50 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
chloeshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Great North Woods
Posts: 2,038
Liked 1431 Times on 785 Posts
Likes Given: 309

Default

Unions love the left, the left loves unions
The left loves gun grabbing
Therefore, Unions, even Police unions, need to fall into line with the left on gun control in order to enjoy continued support from the left.

Maybe its more complicated than that. I doubt it.



__________________
leave the cannoli - take the gun
chloeshooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 07:53 PM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Overkill0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 3,832
Liked 2176 Times on 1120 Posts
Likes Given: 189

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chloeshooter View Post
Unions love the left, the left loves unions
The left loves gun grabbing
Therefore, Unions, even Police unions, need to fall into line with the left on gun control in order to enjoy continued support from the left.

Maybe its more complicated than that. I doubt it.
That's pretty much it... play ball or lose your seat on the gravy train.
__________________
Cheers,
Greg
USAF Retired
NRA Life Member

"Why can't I just eat my waffle?" B. H. Obama. (Sort of representative of his whole tenure, when you think about it.)
Overkill0084 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:00 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
70cuda383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Marysville,OH
Posts: 499
Liked 118 Times on 87 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Overkill0084 View Post
That's pretty much it... play ball or lose your seat on the gravy train.
That's what I always thought too.

but...any reason why the police unions don't try to join the gravy train of the right? I know conservatives are anti-union, but maybe conservatives can be "pro-police union"


probably not.
__________________
70cuda383 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:06 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 2,291
Liked 1252 Times on 784 Posts
Likes Given: 668

Default

Being a LEO and being in a 'union' is a DIRECT conflict of interest because modern unions are nothing more than legalized organized crime!

__________________

An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!

JimRau is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:10 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Edge of Darkness
Posts: 6,495
Liked 4781 Times on 2677 Posts
Likes Given: 1736

Default

Most all of the police unions are members of the national AFL & CIO. This is the most left wing anti fire arm group in the world.

__________________
nitestalker is offline  
shadecorp Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:15 PM   #7
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
shadecorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: S.E. of los angeles
Posts: 998
Liked 474 Times on 266 Posts
Likes Given: 2125

Default

The Key Word
"union"
If I were to tell you my thoughts of my former union.
the u.a.w.,
I would be banned from the site.
__________________
'Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because the U.S. was too strong.'
Ronald Reagan
shadecorp is offline  
KG7IL Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:19 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Tackleberry1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 5,284
Liked 3713 Times on 1831 Posts
Likes Given: 1010

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70cuda383 View Post
That's what I always thought too.

but...any reason why the police unions don't try to join the gravy train of the right? I know conservatives are anti-union, but maybe conservatives can be "pro-police union"


probably not.
I think many conservatives are for LEO's having unions. I think it would be very difficult to fill many LEO jobs if they the did not have a Union between themselves and some of our more liberal politicians who should not hesitate to fire a Cop for putting down a dangerous perp of the wrong "color".

I just don't get why their not more vocal about the lack or merit and the dangers inherent is the current proposals?

Perhaps I'm naive but I would think that any Union's membership would have access to anonymous suggestions and anonymous ballots regarding issues they saw as dangerous or posing unnecessary risk for no benefit?

Tack
__________________
Tackleberry1 is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:27 PM   #9
Retired
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
danf_fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 9,729
Liked 2277 Times on 1362 Posts
Likes Given: 1062

Default

Most local unions will not jump on a political bandwagon.
Unions have issues in mind and are there to represent the member.
The issues include employment, monies, treatment, safety, vacation, and more areas, but not political views.

There is normally a division that deals with political areas that works by donations of members (no, dues do not support the political branch), and they will offer indorsements to candidates.

Bottom line, a union will not get in government issues except in contracts with the US government. And then it is only about "fair" treatment of workers, not with political arguments.

__________________

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC

danf_fl is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2013, 08:31 PM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,087
Liked 756 Times on 449 Posts
Likes Given: 477

Default

Quote:
LEO Unions... Why don't they oppose Gun Control?
If push comes to shove they would probably be shooting their 2nd amendment rights.


__________________

Last edited by PanBaccha; 02-26-2013 at 08:36 PM.
PanBaccha is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
unions?? Lessdragon Politics, Religion and Controversy 21 07-14-2012 03:31 PM
Florida LEOs oppose 'Open Carry' theskunk1946 Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 74 09-24-2011 04:05 PM
Want to know why unions are evil?? JonM Politics, Religion and Controversy 30 08-21-2011 12:58 PM
Oppose Cover-Up Protection Act S. 679 Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 0 06-21-2011 03:38 AM
Pro-Gun Democrats Oppose New Assault Weapon Ban sculker The Club House 14 03-20-2009 10:21 AM