ANYONE who says a magazine capacity ban is "reasonable" doesn't get it.
You are either new to this conflict and don't remember 1994 or have completely forgotten about what happened in the past.
NY had a 10 round limit. As of today it is now 7. How many bullets do you need to hold off multiple assailants? Magazine capacity limit = Stealth AWB.
A mass murderer has plenty of time to reload and almost all of them carry multiple weapons when they use firearms. 10 round limits didn't stop the Columbine killers.
A single defender holding out against two or more armed assailants? Having to reload could mean the difference between life or death. There have been many reports of police shooting attackers multiple times and were unsuccessful bringing them down.
Previous magazine capacity limits did not reduce crime between 1994 and 2004, nor did it prevent mass shootings.
It is not a reasonable compromise.
Every time the gun grabbers talk about "reasonable" what they mean is "Give us what we want and we promise we won't ask for more. Until we do."
It is line in the sand time. They may gain ground, but not without a fight.
"For every problem there is always a solution that is simple, obvious, and wrong." - Mark Twain