Judge upholds CO mag restrictions


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Judge upholds CO mag restrictions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-27-2014, 08:17 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Cnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 52
Liked 18 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 166

Post Judge upholds CO mag restrictions

http://m.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2014/06/26/judge-upholds-colorados-contentious-gun-laws



Cnon


__________________
Cnon is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 06-27-2014, 11:30 AM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 908
Liked 733 Times on 374 Posts
Likes Given: 328

Default

Is this now dead in the water or are they going to appeal?



__________________
mseric is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2014, 02:03 PM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,296
Liked 5698 Times on 3222 Posts
Likes Given: 5106

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mseric View Post
Is this now dead in the water or are they going to appeal?
There are really no grounds for an appeal. It isn't a constitutional issue
__________________
“We sleep safely at night because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would harm us.”


Winston Churchill
locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 03:01 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Cnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 52
Liked 18 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 166

Post

From what I've read on another forum, the sheriff's lawyer says, yes.



Cnon

__________________
Cnon is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 10:05 AM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 908
Liked 733 Times on 374 Posts
Likes Given: 328

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post
There are really no grounds for an appeal. It isn't a constitutional issue
Please explain?

Did you read the Judges 50 page Ruling?
__________________
mseric is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 10:16 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,296
Liked 5698 Times on 3222 Posts
Likes Given: 5106

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mseric View Post
Please explain?

Did you read the Judges 50 page Ruling?

The 2A doesn't really address magazine capacity.
__________________
“We sleep safely at night because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would harm us.”


Winston Churchill
locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 10:28 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,296
Liked 5698 Times on 3222 Posts
Likes Given: 5106

Default

There's also the issue of standing. To have STANDING, you must be harmed by a law.

15 years ago, I wanted to sue under the 1A because my city council passed an ordnance that political yards signs could not be out up more than 30 days before an election.

I had to defy the law, put up a sign, then call the police and ask them to come out and give me a citation. When the citation was issued, I had been injured, and therefore had standing. I sued, and I WON! The ordnance was struck down by the court.

__________________
“We sleep safely at night because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would harm us.”


Winston Churchill

Last edited by locutus; 06-29-2014 at 10:30 PM.
locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 10:36 PM   #8
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,211
Liked 2549 Times on 1246 Posts
Likes Given: 1285

Default

Marcia S Krieger is a Democrat a Liberal and obviously in the Obama anti-gun Camp!
Impartial ruling? What is that! She wouldn't know!
Still need to attack the ruling! And go back after them! Some people are getting real tired of these liberal Democratic judges meddling with the US Citizens Second Amendment and our Constitutional Rights. Magazine capacity has nothing hardly to do with the rounds fired. There have been tests even using a revolver where 30 plus rounds were fired from the wheel gun in 1 minute. That is one round evey two seconds. These people are just wanting to attack the Second Amendment.

03

__________________

The Constitution is not an instrument for the Government to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the Government!
*Patrick Henry

Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

-- John F. Kennedy

Sniper03 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 11:16 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,358
Liked 2108 Times on 1140 Posts
Likes Given: 3175

Default

Quote:
Marcia S Krieger is a Democrat a Liberal and obviously in the Obama anti-gun Camp!
So much for the claim that Republican presidents will appoint only pro Second Amendment judges: Junior Bush appointed the lady.

Quote:
Krieger was nominated to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado by President George W. Bush on September 10, 2001
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcia_S._Krieger
__________________
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2014, 11:21 PM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 908
Liked 733 Times on 374 Posts
Likes Given: 328

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus
There's also the issue of standing. To have STANDING, you must be harmed by a law.
Did you read all 50 pages of the ruling?


__________________
mseric is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Federal Court Upholds CA Ban On Affirmative Action alsaqr Politics, Religion and Controversy 13 04-06-2012 10:29 PM
Court upholds verdict against Arizona rancher who detained illegal immigrants Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 29 02-12-2011 06:05 AM
Maryland AG upholds right to video tape traffic stops Yunus Politics, Religion and Controversy 9 09-08-2010 05:50 AM
Judge upholds limits on DC gun ownership bkt Legal and Activism 13 03-29-2010 11:01 AM
Court upholds police pointing gun at lawful carrier jeffxc Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 35 01-09-2010 08:41 PM