Quote:
Originally Posted by Flat Tire
No. I am saying you are full of BS because you are. First you say it was your idea, you started this thread with this statement.
And then when I said this
All of a sudden you realized it was a bad idea and you really are an Obama loving socialist and you changed you tune.
So I am saying you are full of BS because you started this and it was a bad idea. You just spoke out your ars and it was wrong.
|
You clearly have a reading comprehension problem. I never said I was for it, I was talking about painting a narrative and using it against them.
Lure them in with the concept then throw it in their face. If you fully believe i'm an Obama loving socialist, then I really think you're a moron.
You have an affinity for trolling these forums. If you think the idea of using it against them is a bad idea, then fine, but don't put words in my mouth.
Here, allow me to break it down for you:
See, I lead in with the talking point, then I say this
Quote:
|
Seems to me the knee jerk reaction from a gun grabber would be "those people have rights too!" to which we can grin and respond "you won't march into the home of a known criminal and disarm them? But you'll march into mine and attempt to disarm me?"
|
You can go back to the original post and see for yourself. It's there
"Seems to me the knee jer reaction from a gun grabber would be" _____
To which you can respond "You don't march into the home of a known criminal and disarm them but you will do that to me?"
No where in there did I say we should be doing this. The idea stems from proving that liberal gun grabbers don't want to disarm criminals. They want to disarm law abiding citizens.
If you're too dull to figure that out on your own, then there really is no reason to be speaking with you.