I may have to move to Wyoming
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

I may have to move to Wyoming

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2013, 09:31 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Overkill0084's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,729
Liked 3271 Times on 1641 Posts
Likes Given: 437

Default I may have to move to Wyoming

A number of Wyoming lawmakers are proposing legislation intended to protect gun owners from any future federal ban on semi-automatic rifles or high capacity magazines, KTWO reports.
Introduced last week, the “Firearms Protection Act” would make any federal law banning semi-automatic rifles or limiting magazine capacity unenforceable in Wyoming.
In fact, under the proposed bill, anyone who tried to enforce a federal gun ban could be charged with a felony. The Wyoming Attorney General’s office would also be permitted to defend any state resident against a federal gun ban.
“An act relating to firearms; providing that any federal law which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or to limit the size of a magazine of a firearm or other limitation on firearms in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming; proving a penalty; and providing for an effective date,” the bill states.
“Any official, agent or employee of the United States government who enforces or attempts to enforce any act, order, law, statute, rule or regulation of the United States government upon a personal firearm, a firearm accessory or ammunition that is owned or manufactured commercially or privately in Wyoming and that remains exclusively within the borders of Wyoming shall be guilty of a felony,” the proposed legislation adds.
Per the Washington Examiner’s Charlie Spiering:
One of the bill’s co-sponsors, Wyoming State Senator Larry Hicks, told The Washington Examiner that this type of legislation sends a message to the federal government in Washington D.C.
“It says that your one size fits all solution doesn’t comport to what a vast majority of the state believes,” Hicks explained in an interview.
Citing the Tenth and the Second Amendments, Hicks asserted that the legislation was Constitutional, adding that he fully expected it to pass in the Wyoming state legislature. Hicks said that his Wyoming constituents were upset about the looming threat of gun control coming from Washington, particularly since Vice President Biden signaled yesterday that President Obama was willing to issue an executive order to tackle the gun issue.
Hicks explained that the model of the bill was taken from a bill passed in the State of Montana in 2009 adding that it wasn’t much different from what he’d seen other states do.
Whether or not such a law would actually be effective is a topic that will likely be debated. However, the so-called “Supremacy Clause” in the U.S. Constitution says federal law overrules state law when the two conflict. Still, as we’ve seen in states that have recently legalized marijuana, like Colorado and Washington, the feds don’t always immediately exert their power over a state’s sovereignty.
Read the entire Firearms Protection Act here.
Fortunately WY is pretty close by.
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see. - Ayn Rand
Overkill0084 is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here

Old 01-10-2013, 09:35 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Great North Woods
Posts: 2,565
Liked 2057 Times on 1074 Posts
Likes Given: 392


they know the importance of keeping that prairiedog population down!
chloeshooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 02:02 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Garadex's Avatar
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 1,267
Liked 225 Times on 176 Posts
Likes Given: 228


How many miles is Wyoming from the rest of my family....
I'm gonna stop you right there, you just said an AR-15 is a high-powered rifle. It is obvious you don't know anything about guns and I shall ignore anything you say from this point on.
Garadex is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 02:52 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
dog2000tj's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,309
Liked 3740 Times on 1828 Posts
Likes Given: 13270


Hmmmmm ... might be time to give Wyoming a look
Member: NRA GOA

Est sularas oth mithas

"either way, you were guilty by association, so you were smited...." JD
dog2000tj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 03:02 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Mosin's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Welcome to Earf
Posts: 5,668
Liked 4860 Times on 2423 Posts
Likes Given: 1188


ive been looking at land in wyoming for a few years now...
Mosin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2013, 03:38 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Edge of Darkness
Posts: 6,495
Liked 4798 Times on 2684 Posts
Likes Given: 1736


Why not? The Federals have allowed Colorado to avoid the Federal Drug Laws. Obama told Holder to let Colorado grow sell and use illegal drugs.
Drug use is not protected by the Bill Of Rights. The 2nd A. is clear the Federal government may not "Infringe" on our rights. The gun issue is a state not Federal isssue. OBama should protect our Borders as he is mandated to do. Wyoming will make it clear, Obama you have gone to Damn far.

Last edited by nitestalker; 01-11-2013 at 04:33 AM.
nitestalker is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Newest Threads