I am the Devil's advocate


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > I am the Devil's advocate

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2010, 12:59 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Yunus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: |,Maryland
Posts: 4,808
Liked 1109 Times on 657 Posts
Likes Given: 348

Default I am the Devil's advocate

Anyone who has been here a while knows that I play Devil's advocate. I do this as a measure of prevention no matter what anyone else thinks. Even with the victory yesterday in the SCOTUS there are possible negatives.

So I ask, does anyone agree with or have similar concerns as I do. With the ruling on Monday the SCOTUS basically said the constitution trumps state and local laws. We all rejoice because of 2A. However we now have all our eggs in the federal basket. Slim as the chances may be a new amendment repealing 2A or something of that nature would effectively mean a federal ban on firearm ownership in this country. Before Monday's ruling it could be argued that the 2A did not apply to the states and only applied to the federal government, we can't make that argument anymore. So while I see it as a victory, I also look to the possibility that it could be used against us.

What say you, am I crazy? (For thinking this, not crazy in general) I don't see it happening but I do fear the federal government because it is a mindless entity that serves itself and answers to (sadly) itself. It's supposed to answer to the people but that has been twisted and distorted over the last 200+ years into a system that serves the system.



__________________

"Good people drink good beer."
Hunter S. Thompson

Yunus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 06-30-2010, 01:40 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
IGETEVEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tornado \"Just Blow Me\" Alley,Oklahoma U.S.A.
Posts: 8,424
Liked 27 Times on 21 Posts

Default

"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns!"

I can't speak for anyone else, but the clear line that we all know that separates the good guys from the bad guys, will no doubt become blurred, crossed several times and ignored, like a well used Mexico/United States Border crossing.

I will have a black hat...and guns!

YMMV

Jack


__________________
Jack

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

"There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter." - Hemingway

“The greatest ignorance is to reject something you know nothing about.”
IGETEVEN is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 01:47 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dunerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 8,481
Liked 31 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

I'll ride with ya, EVEN!!

__________________

People get the government they deserve.

dunerunner is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 02:06 AM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
spittinfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maiden,NC
Posts: 9,663
Liked 83 Times on 54 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

I"m with you. The federal government doesn't have the authority to make that decision, even though they want to. I've been saying this for years. Local rules county, county rules state, state rules federal. Who here can say their state isn't waiting for Federal funding? Which county isn't waiting for state funding? Is your city waiting on word from the county? The whole system is bass ackwards!!!

__________________

If the pain is lacking so is the discipline...

"the only 911 call I need is chambering a round" - Mr. Muller, MO car dealer

spittinfire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 02:23 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Jpyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,815
Liked 762 Times on 441 Posts
Likes Given: 457

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yunus View Post
Anyone who has been here a while knows that I play Devil's advocate. I do this as a measure of prevention no matter what anyone else thinks. Even with the victory yesterday in the SCOTUS there are possible negatives.

So I ask, does anyone agree with or have similar concerns as I do. With the ruling on Monday the SCOTUS basically said the constitution trumps state and local laws. We all rejoice because of 2A. However we now have all our eggs in the federal basket. Slim as the chances may be a new amendment repealing 2A or something of that nature would effectively mean a federal ban on firearm ownership in this country. Before Monday's ruling it could be argued that the 2A did not apply to the states and only applied to the federal government, we can't make that argument anymore. So while I see it as a victory, I also look to the possibility that it could be used against us.

What say you, am I crazy? (For thinking this, not crazy in general) I don't see it happening but I do fear the federal government because it is a mindless entity that serves itself and answers to (sadly) itself. It's supposed to answer to the people but that has been twisted and distorted over the last 200+ years into a system that serves the system.
The 2A restricts the government from infringing upon an individual right to keep and bear arms, it does not, and cannot, grant that right. What happened Monday was that the court incorporated the prohibitions of the 2A to the state and local governments under the 14A's Due Process clause. At this point I believe that the toothpaste is out of the tube and nothing short of civil war will change a word of the Second Amendment.
__________________

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

Jpyle is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 04:29 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 128
Default

Easy fix. Recycle Congress. Vote Green.




Solve the "problem" before it can happen.

__________________

BN-Life - NRA
- NRA Certified Instructor -
I'm not worried about terrorism, I was married, TWICE!

Pat-inCO is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 04:39 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 73
Liked 6 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Yunis, great question.

Jplyle, perfect answer.

__________________
dewey is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 04:48 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DrumJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Here in the holler....
Posts: 4,823
Liked 1616 Times on 944 Posts
Likes Given: 1894

Default

For the most part the feds have believed that they trump states laws and have since the civil war. In this case people are happy to see this. I'm not so sure if this would be such a popular thing in other areas.

So even though I'm happy to see that the 2A has been supported (somewhat) The down the road implication are a little troublesome. What should have been handed down from the SCOTUS is the Constitution says this and this is what we'll go by. With the idea that each little aspect of the 2A not to go through the courts we just might see some "common sense regulations" to the 2A. This decision pretty much says now the Constitution can be interpreted line by line in the courts. And the stated that stand on their sovereignty to buck any decision later might be in for trouble.

Many think it's civil unrest that the feds want to give them an excuse to lock everyone down. The conspiracy crowds are already tightening their tin foil hats. Three years ago I would have called them all crazy. But with all that's happened the last 18 months. I'm not sure how surprised I would be anymore.

__________________

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson

DrumJunkie is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 06:17 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
pandamonium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,601
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts

Default

On another thread Pat-inCo posted a link to an article on the Institute for Justice website, that was a good read. There is another article on that site that explains alot of how this works, meaning how the scotus interperprets the Constitution and Bill of Right, it's 18 pages but it gives great insight to how the scotus works. IMO it is worth the time to read.


http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/neily.pdf

__________________
GUN CONTROL, I GOT THAT

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first. Thomas Jefferson
pandamonium is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 09:21 AM   #10
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

As long as there is more than one lawyer or judge running around, there will be more than one way to interpret law. Any law. Even one as straightforward as 2A.

Does the potential exist for bad things in the future? Sure. We could lose a conservative jurist on the Supreme Court and Obama could appoint someone else as bad as Kagan and then the balance flips to the leftist idiots who could revisit the issue and turn it around.

There's no chance of 2A being repealed in this current climate, but it's always a possibility in the future. But thus far, NONE of the first ten amendments have been repealed or modified since they were written.

What's likely to happen in some locales is they will stretch the subjective term "reasonable" used in the ruling and keep bad gun control laws in place.



__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes