Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   Legal and Activism (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f97/)
-   -   I am the Devil's advocate (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f97/i-am-devils-advocate-28859/)

Yunus 06-30-2010 01:59 AM

I am the Devil's advocate
 
Anyone who has been here a while knows that I play Devil's advocate. I do this as a measure of prevention no matter what anyone else thinks. Even with the victory yesterday in the SCOTUS there are possible negatives.

So I ask, does anyone agree with or have similar concerns as I do. With the ruling on Monday the SCOTUS basically said the constitution trumps state and local laws. We all rejoice because of 2A. However we now have all our eggs in the federal basket. Slim as the chances may be a new amendment repealing 2A or something of that nature would effectively mean a federal ban on firearm ownership in this country. Before Monday's ruling it could be argued that the 2A did not apply to the states and only applied to the federal government, we can't make that argument anymore. So while I see it as a victory, I also look to the possibility that it could be used against us.

What say you, am I crazy? (For thinking this, not crazy in general) I don't see it happening but I do fear the federal government because it is a mindless entity that serves itself and answers to (sadly) itself. It's supposed to answer to the people but that has been twisted and distorted over the last 200+ years into a system that serves the system.

IGETEVEN 06-30-2010 02:40 AM

"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns!"

I can't speak for anyone else, but the clear line that we all know that separates the good guys from the bad guys, will no doubt become blurred, crossed several times and ignored, like a well used Mexico/United States Border crossing.

I will have a black hat...and guns! ;)

YMMV

Jack

dunerunner 06-30-2010 02:47 AM

I'll ride with ya, EVEN!!

spittinfire 06-30-2010 03:06 AM

I"m with you. The federal government doesn't have the authority to make that decision, even though they want to. I've been saying this for years. Local rules county, county rules state, state rules federal. Who here can say their state isn't waiting for Federal funding? Which county isn't waiting for state funding? Is your city waiting on word from the county? The whole system is bass ackwards!!!

Jpyle 06-30-2010 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yunus (Post 308069)
Anyone who has been here a while knows that I play Devil's advocate. I do this as a measure of prevention no matter what anyone else thinks. Even with the victory yesterday in the SCOTUS there are possible negatives.

So I ask, does anyone agree with or have similar concerns as I do. With the ruling on Monday the SCOTUS basically said the constitution trumps state and local laws. We all rejoice because of 2A. However we now have all our eggs in the federal basket. Slim as the chances may be a new amendment repealing 2A or something of that nature would effectively mean a federal ban on firearm ownership in this country. Before Monday's ruling it could be argued that the 2A did not apply to the states and only applied to the federal government, we can't make that argument anymore. So while I see it as a victory, I also look to the possibility that it could be used against us.

What say you, am I crazy? (For thinking this, not crazy in general) I don't see it happening but I do fear the federal government because it is a mindless entity that serves itself and answers to (sadly) itself. It's supposed to answer to the people but that has been twisted and distorted over the last 200+ years into a system that serves the system.

The 2A restricts the government from infringing upon an individual right to keep and bear arms, it does not, and cannot, grant that right. What happened Monday was that the court incorporated the prohibitions of the 2A to the state and local governments under the 14A's Due Process clause. At this point I believe that the toothpaste is out of the tube and nothing short of civil war will change a word of the Second Amendment.

Pat-inCO 06-30-2010 05:29 AM

Easy fix. Recycle Congress. Vote Green.

http://www.w0ipl.net/Vote_Green.jpg


Solve the "problem" before it can happen.

dewey 06-30-2010 05:39 AM

Yunis, great question.

Jplyle, perfect answer.

DrumJunkie 06-30-2010 05:48 AM

For the most part the feds have believed that they trump states laws and have since the civil war. In this case people are happy to see this. I'm not so sure if this would be such a popular thing in other areas.

So even though I'm happy to see that the 2A has been supported (somewhat) The down the road implication are a little troublesome. What should have been handed down from the SCOTUS is the Constitution says this and this is what we'll go by. With the idea that each little aspect of the 2A not to go through the courts we just might see some "common sense regulations" to the 2A. This decision pretty much says now the Constitution can be interpreted line by line in the courts. And the stated that stand on their sovereignty to buck any decision later might be in for trouble.

Many think it's civil unrest that the feds want to give them an excuse to lock everyone down. The conspiracy crowds are already tightening their tin foil hats. Three years ago I would have called them all crazy. But with all that's happened the last 18 months. I'm not sure how surprised I would be anymore.

pandamonium 06-30-2010 07:17 AM

On another thread Pat-inCo posted a link to an article on the Institute for Justice website, that was a good read. There is another article on that site that explains alot of how this works, meaning how the scotus interperprets the Constitution and Bill of Right, it's 18 pages but it gives great insight to how the scotus works. IMO it is worth the time to read.


http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/neily.pdf

bkt 06-30-2010 10:21 AM

As long as there is more than one lawyer or judge running around, there will be more than one way to interpret law. Any law. Even one as straightforward as 2A.

Does the potential exist for bad things in the future? Sure. We could lose a conservative jurist on the Supreme Court and Obama could appoint someone else as bad as Kagan and then the balance flips to the leftist idiots who could revisit the issue and turn it around.

There's no chance of 2A being repealed in this current climate, but it's always a possibility in the future. But thus far, NONE of the first ten amendments have been repealed or modified since they were written.

What's likely to happen in some locales is they will stretch the subjective term "reasonable" used in the ruling and keep bad gun control laws in place.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.