HR 347 aimed at pro-gun supporters?


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > HR 347 aimed at pro-gun supporters?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-25-2013, 03:37 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JoshH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 158
Liked 43 Times on 21 Posts

Default HR 347 aimed at pro-gun supporters?

So yet another anti-constitution bill was passed almost unanimously (388-3) in congress & signed into law by King Obama on Thursday without much press. This basically says you can no longer protest or assemble in defiance in any place the secret service is present or plans to be present in the near future! Why wasn't this passed when we had all the occupy people or the G8 people protesting? Only now that gun rights are being fought for are they are they trying to strip our right to protest this baloons policies ?



__________________
JoshH is offline  
CA357 Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-25-2013, 03:38 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JoshH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 158
Liked 43 Times on 21 Posts

Default

*Bafoon* damn auto correct:-/



__________________
JoshH is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 03:40 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JoshH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 158
Liked 43 Times on 21 Posts

Default

PS Ron Paul was one of the 3 who refused to vote for this. I wonder how long it will take for the Supreme Court to throw this one out?

__________________
JoshH is offline  
BigByrd47119 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 04:03 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

The crux of this is "willfully & knowingly". They're removing "willfully" and that's the big deal. Willfully means the gov. must prove intent. With that removed, they don't have to do that anymore. It gets their ducks in a row for mass arrests at any protest or civil demonstration. They'll silence opposition at any cost and continue to destroy the Constitution and B.O.R. with impunity.

http://www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/how-big-deal-hr-347-criminalizing-protest-bill

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 05:11 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,900
Liked 2057 Times on 827 Posts
Likes Given: 2706

Default

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h.r.00347:

If this is the bill you are talking about it was signed into law on 3/8/2012, we already got a thread on it someplace
__________________
opaww is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 05:18 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

That's the one. For some reason, it's popping up on the web now.

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 05:54 PM   #7
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,349
Liked 1886 Times on 1092 Posts
Likes Given: 3892

Default

Some stand outs in that thing!

Quote:
The original statute, unchanged by H.R. 347,made certain conduct with respect to these restricted areas a crime, including simple trespass, actions in or near the restricted area that would "disrupt the orderly conduct of Government," and blocking the entrance or exit to the restricted area.

H.R. 347 did make one noteworthy change, which may make it easier for the Secret Service to overuse or misuse the statute to arrest lawful protesters.

Any time the government lowers the intent requirement, it makes it easier for a prosecutor to prove her case, and it gives law enforcement more discretion when enforcing the law. To be sure, this is of concern to the ACLU. We will monitor the implementation of H.R. 347 for any abuse or misuse.

Also, while H.R. 347, on its own, is only of incremental importance, it could be misused as part of a larger move by the Secret Service and others to suppress lawful protest by relegating it to particular locations at a public event. These "free speech zones" are frequently used to target certain viewpoints or to keep protesters away from the cameras. Although H.R. 347 doesn't directly address free speech zones, it is part of the set of laws that make this conduct possible, and should be seen in this context.

Rest assured we'll be keeping an eye on how this law will be interpreted and used by law enforcement — especially in light of the coming elections.
__________________
Bigcountry02 is offline  
CA357 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 05:54 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BigByrd47119's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,401
Liked 1102 Times on 677 Posts
Likes Given: 2389

Default

I thought this came up in 11'? Is it a reoccuring deal or what? Its horse spit for sure either way.

__________________

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
---Ron Paul

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetuate it."
---Dr. Martin Luther King

"If you think we are free today, you know nothing about tyranny and even less about freedom."
---Tom Braun

BigByrd47119 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 05:57 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,900
Liked 2057 Times on 827 Posts
Likes Given: 2706

Default

It came up in 2011 but was not signed into law until 3/8/2012

__________________
opaww is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2013, 06:01 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BigByrd47119's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,401
Liked 1102 Times on 677 Posts
Likes Given: 2389

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opaww View Post
It came up in 2011 but was not signed into law until 3/8/2012
Thought so. It gets a (dis)honorable mention in my thread titled "Scorecard: How Many Rights have Americans Lost" over in the politics section.


__________________

“Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it’s realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy.”
---Ron Paul

"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetuate it."
---Dr. Martin Luther King

"If you think we are free today, you know nothing about tyranny and even less about freedom."
---Tom Braun

BigByrd47119 is offline  
CA357 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Anti-Gun Supporters Sniper03 Legal and Activism 12 01-29-2013 01:39 AM
For all of you Ron Paul supporters ScottA Politics, Religion and Controversy 12 01-04-2012 09:22 PM
Anti-Gun Propaganda, Aimed at New Parents ApacheBunny Legal and Activism 26 03-01-2011 03:09 PM
Checkpoints aimed at stopping terrorist threat Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 5 10-30-2009 04:37 AM
Liberal NRA supporters darkwolf228 Legal and Activism 33 09-08-2008 07:37 PM