How a Supreme Court Justice Views the Constitution
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

How a Supreme Court Justice Views the Constitution

Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2012, 07:44 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Kemosabe's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 110
Liked 19 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default How a Supreme Court Justice Views the Constitution

I came across an article regarding Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's recent visit to Princeton University to promote his new book, "Reading Law." During the visit, this is what he said about our Constitution...

As Scalia often does in public speaking, he cracked wise, taking aim mostly at those who view the Constitution as a "living document" that changes with the times. "It isn't a living document," Scalia said. "It's dead, dead, dead, dead." Scalia said that interpreting laws requires adherence to the words used and to their meanings at the time they were written.

This is my opinion... I have always thought of Justice Scalia as a pompus, arogant scumbag. Every time I have seen him on the news just makes me want to puke. If this is really his thoughts, how do you think he would react to the Second Amendment? I will tell you how. I found an article about him speaking to Fox News regarding the Second Amendment...

Supreme Court Justice antonin Scalia says the Constitution's right to bear arms isn't absolute and could be changed in the future. Scalia, a card carrying conservative and stalwart of the Court's right-leaning majority, told Fox News Sunday "that the Second Amendment's language allowing citizens the right to own weapons doesn't mean they can own any weapon they want. There are some limitations that can be imposed. What they are will depend on what society understood were reasonable limitations at the (future) time."

If you are still not convinced, read this article from the National Journal titled, "Guns May Be Regulated."

The future is looking to be a scary time for us who uphold our right... "to keep and bear arms." Granted, there's nothing we can do about who becomes a Supreme Court Justice, as they are appointed by the POTUS. If Obama has the chance to appoint one or two more Justices, he is close to having enough votes on the court to change the definition of the Second Amendment, and exactly what are rights will be regarding possession of firearms.
37 People are murdered every day by the unlawful use of a firearm.
2,191 are saved every day by the lawful use of a firearm.
84,999,989 American gun owners killed no one yesterday.
Kemosabe is offline  

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 12-11-2012, 07:49 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
orangello's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,154
Liked 5738 Times on 3362 Posts
Likes Given: 4877


Meh, i break other laws; heck, i rolled a stop sign on the way to work today. I do wonder, if restrictions get ridiculous, how many people will have illegal suppressors and paperless SBR's and such.
Dead Bears, the only good kind.
orangello is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 08:39 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Donn's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,089
Liked 500 Times on 323 Posts
Likes Given: 4


Kemo, it's not what he says, it's how he votes. So far at least, he's on our side re:the 2nd Amendment. I'll take that all day long as opposed to the opinions of the Hon. Ms. Ginsberg, Kagan and Sotomayor.
Never argue with an idiot in public. People passing by won't know which one of you is the idiot.
Donn is offline  
shadecorp Likes This 
Old 12-11-2012, 08:55 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,624
Liked 2220 Times on 1525 Posts
Likes Given: 820


Dang it, I was speeding on I-95 today. I wonder if pickup trucks will be banned next. Many more people are killed in an automobiles. Even the Brady bunch know that 26% of the people in the US support a firearms ban. I got the 26% number from the Brady blog.
John_Deer is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:25 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
locutus's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 11,855
Liked 8387 Times on 4562 Posts
Likes Given: 8148


Scalia is one of the best friends gun owners have ever had on the SCOTUS. Period!

For the absolutists that believe the 2A gives you the right to buy Stinger missiles, tanks and hand grenades, you won't like anyone on the SCOTUS.,

Every right has limitations. 1A doesn't protect you if you yell "fire" in a crowded theater. 4A protects you from a"unreasonable search and seizure, not ALL search and seizure.

There will always be limits on what the 2A protects. Thank God we've got folks like Scalia defining those limitations.

Read Scalia's opinion in the case of "Heller v D.C."
I didn't fight to defend your freedom so you could vote to take away mine.

"A man who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.
John Stuart Mill."
locutus is offline  
Old 12-11-2012, 10:48 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9214 Times on 5058 Posts
Likes Given: 74


I believe that the intent of the founders in writing in the 2A was that the citizens should have the right to own the very same armaments as the standing military, up to, and including, Stingers, Mortars, Belt Fed's, hand grenades, Tanks, fighter jets, and even nukes and aircraft carriers if private funds permit, along with hiring the personnel to pilot and maintain such equipment.

I also believe that if such were true, we wouldn't even have weapons of mass destruction.
trip286 is offline  
Bladerunnerfury Likes This 
Old 12-11-2012, 10:58 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
JonM's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,356
Liked 6909 Times on 3672 Posts
Likes Given: 519


please keep political topics to the political controversy subforum. thanks
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

"I crapped my pants to avoid the draft!!" -Ted Nugent
JonM is online now  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
One Supreme Court Justice away from losing 2A partdeux Politics, Religion and Controversy 11 10-05-2012 03:30 PM
Information on Kagan nomination for Supreme Court Justice Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 6 05-15-2010 01:48 AM
Supreme Court Appointment falseharmonix Politics, Religion and Controversy 28 05-30-2009 10:44 PM
Supreme Court on RKBA bkt Politics, Religion and Controversy 2 03-19-2008 01:30 AM
2nd Amendment - Supreme Court notdku Legal and Activism 5 11-20-2007 05:40 PM

Newest Threads