How a Supreme Court Justice Views the Constitution
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > How a Supreme Court Justice Views the Constitution

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2012, 08:44 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Kemosabe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 110
Liked 19 Times on 12 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default How a Supreme Court Justice Views the Constitution

I came across an article regarding Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's recent visit to Princeton University to promote his new book, "Reading Law." During the visit, this is what he said about our Constitution...

As Scalia often does in public speaking, he cracked wise, taking aim mostly at those who view the Constitution as a "living document" that changes with the times. "It isn't a living document," Scalia said. "It's dead, dead, dead, dead." Scalia said that interpreting laws requires adherence to the words used and to their meanings at the time they were written.

This is my opinion... I have always thought of Justice Scalia as a pompus, arogant scumbag. Every time I have seen him on the news just makes me want to puke. If this is really his thoughts, how do you think he would react to the Second Amendment? I will tell you how. I found an article about him speaking to Fox News regarding the Second Amendment...

Supreme Court Justice antonin Scalia says the Constitution's right to bear arms isn't absolute and could be changed in the future. Scalia, a card carrying conservative and stalwart of the Court's right-leaning majority, told Fox News Sunday "that the Second Amendment's language allowing citizens the right to own weapons doesn't mean they can own any weapon they want. There are some limitations that can be imposed. What they are will depend on what society understood were reasonable limitations at the (future) time."

If you are still not convinced, read this article from the National Journal titled, "Guns May Be Regulated."

The future is looking to be a scary time for us who uphold our right... "to keep and bear arms." Granted, there's nothing we can do about who becomes a Supreme Court Justice, as they are appointed by the POTUS. If Obama has the chance to appoint one or two more Justices, he is close to having enough votes on the court to change the definition of the Second Amendment, and exactly what are rights will be regarding possession of firearms.

__________________
37 People are murdered every day by the unlawful use of a firearm.
2,191 are saved every day by the lawful use of a firearm.
84,999,989 American gun owners killed no one yesterday.
Kemosabe is offline  
 

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 12-11-2012, 08:49 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,155
Liked 5734 Times on 3360 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

Meh, i break other laws; heck, i rolled a stop sign on the way to work today. I do wonder, if restrictions get ridiculous, how many people will have illegal suppressors and paperless SBR's and such.

__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
 
Old 12-11-2012, 09:39 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Donn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 989
Liked 409 Times on 266 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Kemo, it's not what he says, it's how he votes. So far at least, he's on our side re:the 2nd Amendment. I'll take that all day long as opposed to the opinions of the Hon. Ms. Ginsberg, Kagan and Sotomayor.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot in public. People passing by won't know which one of you is the idiot.
Donn is offline  
shadecorp Likes This 
Old 12-11-2012, 09:55 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
John_Deer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,463
Liked 2163 Times on 1486 Posts
Likes Given: 804

Default

Dang it, I was speeding on I-95 today. I wonder if pickup trucks will be banned next. Many more people are killed in an automobiles. Even the Brady bunch know that 26% of the people in the US support a firearms ban. I got the 26% number from the Brady blog.

__________________
John_Deer is offline  
 
Old 12-11-2012, 11:25 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 10,280
Liked 6621 Times on 3689 Posts
Likes Given: 6293

Default

Scalia is one of the best friends gun owners have ever had on the SCOTUS. Period!

For the absolutists that believe the 2A gives you the right to buy Stinger missiles, tanks and hand grenades, you won't like anyone on the SCOTUS.,

Every right has limitations. 1A doesn't protect you if you yell "fire" in a crowded theater. 4A protects you from a"unreasonable search and seizure, not ALL search and seizure.

There will always be limits on what the 2A protects. Thank God we've got folks like Scalia defining those limitations.

Read Scalia's opinion in the case of "Heller v D.C."
locutus is offline  
 
Old 12-11-2012, 11:48 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: West, by God, Funroe,Louisiana
Posts: 18,707
Liked 9206 Times on 5058 Posts
Likes Given: 74

Default

I believe that the intent of the founders in writing in the 2A was that the citizens should have the right to own the very same armaments as the standing military, up to, and including, Stingers, Mortars, Belt Fed's, hand grenades, Tanks, fighter jets, and even nukes and aircraft carriers if private funds permit, along with hiring the personnel to pilot and maintain such equipment.

I also believe that if such were true, we wouldn't even have weapons of mass destruction.

__________________
trip286 is offline  
Bladerunnerfury Likes This 
Old 12-11-2012, 11:58 PM   #7
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 18,091
Liked 6026 Times on 3157 Posts
Likes Given: 432

Default

please keep political topics to the political controversy subforum. thanks

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is online now  
 
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
One Supreme Court Justice away from losing 2A partdeux Politics, Religion and Controversy 11 10-05-2012 04:30 PM
Information on Kagan nomination for Supreme Court Justice Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 6 05-15-2010 02:48 AM
Supreme Court Appointment falseharmonix Politics, Religion and Controversy 28 05-30-2009 11:44 PM
Supreme Court on RKBA bkt Politics, Religion and Controversy 2 03-19-2008 02:30 AM
2nd Amendment - Supreme Court notdku Legal and Activism 5 11-20-2007 06:40 PM