Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Heller vs Dc--one manís frivolous lawsuit

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2008, 10:47 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 59
Default Heller vs Dc--one manís frivolous lawsuit

The gun lobby at last holds its Holy Grail: a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court that the oddly worded Second Amendment, which speaks of a “well regulated militia” in the same sentence as “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” does, in fact, bestow upon individuals a constitutional right to own weapons.

Yet it seems that the most extreme crusaders of the right were not sufficiently careful in what they wished for. Even the five conservative justices who took their side and overturned decades of precedent to discover this “right” to private gun ownership believe that Congress and, apparently, states and cities have a perfect right—if not an obligation—to impose a host of restrictions on who can own a gun and where a firearm may be carried.

In other words, gun control is not the same as gun confiscation.

Most of the public has believed in this common sense for quite a long time. Yet polls that show strong support for gun control hasn’t stopped the gun lobby from arguing, even after the bloodiest and most emotionally shocking rampages, such as those at Columbine High School and Virginia Tech, that sensible restrictions aimed at controlling who owns a gun and where it can be carried amount to an illegal intrusion upon its rights. After the Virginia Tech slayings, for example, several gun-rights groups argued that the answer was to lift a broad prohibition against carrying guns on college campuses.

The Supreme Court ruling struck down the District of Columbia law that effectively banned the ownership of handguns, the strictest gun-control law in the nation and one the gun lobby therefore had targeted for obliteration. But the high court simultaneously eviscerated a dogma that the high priests of the gun-rights lobby have long promoted: The justices—even Scalia, who wrote the majority opinion—effectively eliminated the argument that regulating guns is somehow equivalent to seizing them. And Scalia endorsed, with some specificity, a host of gun regulations that embrace pretty much every approach that various states and cities have been putting into place since the late 1960s. These are, it must be noted, the very sorts of laws the gun lobby has doggedly and noisily protested.

“Nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms,” Scalia wrote.

We do not know, in specific terms, just how the avalanche of lawsuits the gun lobby now intends to bring against federal and state gun regulations will turn out. That’s another ironic outcome of the conservatives’ great triumph: A movement that loudly protests the litigation explosion now promises coast-to-coast courtroom pyrotechnics over laws that have been in force for years. Ironically, one of the gun lobby’s recent endeavors has been a campaign to block big-city mayors and gun-violence victims from suing gun manufacturers and unscrupulous dealers.

But one man’s frivolous lawsuit is now, apparently, fundamental to another’s pursuit of freedom.

The gun lobby already has filed suit against municipalities that have laws similar to the one struck down in the District of Columbia. Wayne LaPierre, the National Rifle Association’s executive vice president, told me that licensing and permitting systems, such as the one long in place in New York City, also could be targeted. “We don’t like the licensing of freedom,” he says. “We consider that the same as licensing someone to go to church or to speak.”

So the lid of the Pandora’s box of new gun litigation has sprung wide open. Courts around the country will be asked to decide on public safety strategies that traditionally have been determined by legislatures and city councils. “All of these issues are going to have to be litigated in the courts,” says Kristen Rand, legislative director of the Violence Policy Center in Washington. “This is exactly the opposite of what conservatives say they want the courts to do.”

But consistency never seems to do when political expediency requires another course. That is a hobgoblin the high court ignored when it reversed the historical interpretation to discover an individual right to bear arms. Now, then, for the definition of what responsibilities go along with this new right.


"We The People"



__________________

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't
pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for,
protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend
our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it
was once like in the United States where men were free." -- Ronald Reagan

"We The People"
"The Pro Gun Blog"

tracker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-01-2008, 11:12 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ScottG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,614
Liked 9 Times on 3 Posts

Default

That's what I think gets you the link requests from anti-gunners. This posting makes it look like you support this story, when you don't. You need to make it clear on your blog that this is unsupported by you. Also, just excerpt, don't post the whole story, it's a copyright violation. Make comments about the story, don't just run it or the gun grabbers will think you're on their side.

__________________

9x18=Makarov

ScottG is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2008, 11:32 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottG View Post
That's what I think gets you the link requests from anti-gunners. This posting makes it look like you support this story, when you don't. You need to make it clear on your blog that this is unsupported by you. Also, just excerpt, don't post the whole story, it's a copyright violation. Make comments about the story, don't just run it or the gun grabbers will think you're on their side.
Thanks for the Info ScottG--You may be right about people thinking of my firm belief in what I post. However as far as the copyright violation--I gave full credit to the author, and never claimed authorship--( I know--My other Website is protected by Copyscape). But you have made a great point about the Gun-Grabbers---Thanks for the imput--I just thought that people would blame the author---not me---I owe ya Scott!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't
pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for,
protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend
our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it
was once like in the United States where men were free." -- Ronald Reagan

"We The People"
"The Pro Gun Blog"

tracker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Whatever Happened To Heller V. Washington DC ??? SlamFire Politics, Religion and Controversy 7 03-30-2009 04:50 PM
SF loses lawsuit--has to pay NRA :) Musket Politics, Religion and Controversy 4 02-10-2009 12:26 AM
The Heller Decision Vs. Executive Order? billt Politics, Religion and Controversy 12 11-25-2008 09:07 PM
Dick Heller Files New Lawsuit Against Washington, D.C. opaww Politics, Religion and Controversy 5 07-29-2008 02:15 PM
They still wont let Dick Heller register his gun! sculker The Club House 13 07-19-2008 10:01 PM



Newest Threads