[PrimePorkchop]

I am so angry that I just don't know how to respond quite yet. I have to get over the liberal methods used in constructing this speech and I have to pick my self up off the floor because I realized that there are people out there who are going to read this and get on board with it without having ever looked into anything for themselves.

What makes me more angry than anything is that this country actually elected this man. My one silver lining is I truly believe that this one comment just completely sealed his fate as a one term president

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-urges-tighter-background-checks-gun-buyers-aurora-033815400.html

"A lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not in the hands of criminals -- that they belong on the battlefield of war, not on the streets of our cities," the president, who has called for reimposing the Assault Weapons Ban, said in a speech to the National Urban League.

[therewolf]

It really just shows him up for the half-baked tater-tot he is.

Anybody who wants to agree with him simply doesn't understand

three things:

Disarming us only makes criminals stronger-

The BATFE and other DOJ organizations aren't doing their job-

He isn't doing HIS job...

[Dillinger]

Well tinfoil hats aside I have been waiting for this since the election was set. Which one of these two clowns' camp was going to insist their candidate take a hard stance against gun ownership first?

Obviously Obama's camp thinks that announcing these views first is going to seal the deal by playing on the tragedy of the recent events.

What baffles me is how the two sided coin continues to be in play.

On one hand you have the media classifying the Aurora shooter as any of the following: "a loner, desperate, crazy, misguided, malice-minded" and any of a number of other clever statements to make the general public feel this person is not normal and therefor must be an oddity.

On the other hand, the weapons in question must be banned because obviously they are the cause for this crazy person's ability to kill and maim so many.

Well what about the several million legal weapons that are owned by people who aren't "desperate, crazy, misguided, malice-minded" that have never done anyone any harm?

I am pretty sure if you were to have an actual study of the people that own weapon X (in this case the Ak-47) you are going to find that 99.99% of the legal owners have never done anything violent or malice minded to another person in their lives.

So how can the weapon be an issue?

Those idiots that shot up the North Hollywood bank (I know their names but am not naming them) did not own legal weapons. They were both felons, and thus could not own weapons at all, but used illegal weapons with illegal modifications.

How is that a reflection of a legal, registered and law abiding gun owner that has never taken a dime that wasn't theirs in their life?

I truly hope that the American public in general is done with this particular experiment in yet another liberal minded POTUS. My Generation had Carter and the younger generation now has the worst example to date.

JD

[levelcross]

PPC I had the same reaction when I read it. The article is full of contradictions, it is already illegal for criminals to own these or any gun is it not?
If he is so pro 2nd A then why does he not make it a Campaign topic? Why is he letting witch Hillary attend the UN ATT talks? Why does he only feel the military should own AK-47's??? Why


Typical BS from a badly misplaced rectum.

[WebleyFosbery38]

And yet his followers will still swear we are a bunch of paranoid gun totin whack's. The next decree will be what kind of and how many of guns and bullets Barry Oh and his UN Bedbuddies will allow us to have. Lets see, any nerf gun, daisy rider and maybe for those that want the really big guns, you can have a 4-10 or a .22LR but not both at once! You will be happy to know Barry prefers the one shot one kill method also cause your only gonna be able to have one bullet at a time!

[c3shooter]

Caulking guns, grease guns, and staple guns will be fine. As long as they are not black and do not have high capacity magazines.

Do not confuse gun control and political control.

[alxltd1]

Well this is no real surprise. He only needed a tragedy like the shooting in Colorado to bring it into his campaign. He is banking on the knee jerk reaction of the nation to this horror to support his actions. Actions he would never bring forward if this incident had not happened. The only way to defeat him is to vote him out of office and all of his cronies in the House and Senate as well.

[Dillinger]

Originally Posted by alxltd1

The only way to defeat him is to vote him out of office and all of his cronies in the House and Senate as well.

VOTE OUT EVERY INCUMBENT!!

Force change on them this time around. Time for the politicians to wake up and realize you work for us, we are not subjects to you.

No one who is sitting in office, D or R, is getting my vote this time. I am voting against every single one of the snakes.

JD

[jjfuller1]

im curious since when are all our soldier issued ak 47's? lol. but in general obama is lower than the scum on my toilet.

[KeysKelly]

The first question I would have for King Barrack is, if guns like this only belong on the battlefield and only in the hands of active duty soldiers why were hundreds, if not thousands, of them put in the hands of Mexican Drug Lords and Criminals by Barrack himself, Holder and the rest of The Obama Gang?