Gun Free Zone liability - Are business owners responsible?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Gun Free Zone liability - Are business owners responsible?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-24-2012, 07:43 AM   #1
Devil's Advocate and Provocateur
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TekGreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cincinnati,OH
Posts: 1,863
Liked 1319 Times on 689 Posts
Likes Given: 606

Question Gun Free Zone liability - Are business owners responsible?

Should people responsible for creating Gun Free Zones (GFZs) also be liable for any deaths or injuries it causes? There are some sites that have started discussing the liability of city officials or business owners creating GFZs and not allowing legally licensed people to defend themselves to their own detriment. What happens when the theater owners in Aurora, CO. get sued by people that had CCWs and weren't allowed to carry? Do these owners and their insurance companies carry a GREATER responsibility for creating a life-threatening GFZ?

What are your thoughts?

__________________

.
.
“Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." (I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.). Thomas Jefferson

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

-Edmund Burke, Loosely translated from Thoughts on the Cause of Present Discontents. (1770)

TekGreg is offline  
therewolf Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-24-2012, 08:01 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Reno,Texas
Posts: 10,211
Liked 6562 Times on 3635 Posts
Likes Given: 27929

Default

Absolutely. I think they should be held completely responsible for what happens in gun free zones.

__________________
texaswoodworker is offline  
therewolf Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 08:05 AM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
RJMercer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 511
Liked 396 Times on 205 Posts
Likes Given: 588

Default

I'm with Tex.

__________________
RJMercer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 08:22 AM   #4
Devil's Advocate and Provocateur
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TekGreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cincinnati,OH
Posts: 1,863
Liked 1319 Times on 689 Posts
Likes Given: 606

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texaswoodworker
Absolutely. I think they should be held completely responsible for what happens in gun free zones.
I wonder if it would be worth it for a pro-NRA or pro-gun attorney to do a class action lawsuit in the name of all the disarmed citizens. THAT would put it front page in the paper!
__________________

.
.
“Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." (I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.). Thomas Jefferson

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

-Edmund Burke, Loosely translated from Thoughts on the Cause of Present Discontents. (1770)

TekGreg is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 08:33 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JeeperSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 113
Liked 17 Times on 12 Posts

Default

I don't think a business should be held liable in that case. Because I feel a private business owner should have the right to not allow someone on their property for any reason, even because of a gun.

At the same time, I don't think it should be a 'criminal matter' or even a violation of your Concealed weapons license for bringing your gun into a business that forbids them. It should be as simple as the business owner/employee asking you to leave the property. And if you refuse to leave it then becomes trespassing.

__________________

Last edited by JeeperSC; 07-24-2012 at 08:37 AM.
JeeperSC is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 09:19 AM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
armsmaster270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sacramento,CA
Posts: 752
Liked 141 Times on 91 Posts
Likes Given: 155

Default

I'm with the Sue Them crowd if you cause injury or death by your policy you should pay.

__________________
https://sites.google.com/a/armsmaster.net/www/
http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/ff207/armsmaster270/

http://militarysignatures.com/signat...ember14888.png
Retired LE, M.P., Sr. M.P. Investigator, armorer, F.B.I. Trained Rangemaster/Firearms Instructor , Presently Forensic Document Examiner for D.H.S.
armsmaster270 is offline  
therewolf Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 10:02 AM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
towboater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewares,Ky
Posts: 3,585
Liked 1719 Times on 894 Posts
Likes Given: 3644

Default

NO.

If a buisnes owner is responsible for deaths due to gfz.
The owner will also be responsible for any deaths caused from allowing concealed carry.
And if that's the case. I sure ain't gonna have a business.

__________________

Last edited by towboater; 07-24-2012 at 10:50 AM.
towboater is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 11:48 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 238
Liked 51 Times on 32 Posts
Likes Given: 14

Default

Quote:
What happens when the theater owners in Aurora, CO. get sued by people that had CCWs and weren't allowed to carry?
The theater owners in Aurora CO had nothing to do with the Gun Free Zone. The entire city of Aurora CO is a gun free zone. That's right, it is illegal to carry anywhere in the city of Aurora.

The City of Aurora, Colorado would have arrested anyone who stopped the Batman massacre with a concealed weapon.

http://www.naturalnews.com/036549_Aurora_concealed_carry_gun_confiscation.htm l
__________________
steve4102 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 12:07 PM   #9
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeeperSC View Post
I don't think a business should be held liable in that case. Because I feel a private business owner should have the right to not allow someone on their property for any reason, even because of a gun.

At the same time, I don't think it should be a 'criminal matter' or even a violation of your Concealed weapons license for bringing your gun into a business that forbids them. It should be as simple as the business owner/employee asking you to leave the property. And if you refuse to leave it then becomes trespassing.
Exactly right. Also, as a consumer you have a choice to avoid commercial establishments with a GFZ policy.
__________________
bkt is offline  
orangello Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 12:17 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 238
Liked 51 Times on 32 Posts
Likes Given: 14

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkt View Post
Exactly right. Also, as a consumer you have a choice to avoid commercial establishments with a GFZ policy.
So, what do you do when your entire city becomes a GFZ?
__________________
steve4102 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Gun Free Zone JonM Legal and Activism 25 12-18-2011 07:41 PM
Ihop is a pistol free zone RomeoTango Legal and Activism 12 04-13-2010 04:22 AM
Gun free zone! wsearfoss The Club House 2 09-18-2009 07:44 AM
Your own Gun Free Zone! bkt The Club House 3 07-28-2007 07:49 PM