Grand Rapids MI PD Response to Open Carrier - Page 7
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

Grand Rapids MI PD Response to Open Carrier


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2014, 03:28 AM   #61
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
enfieldaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 73
Liked 24 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Deer View Post

Federal law says you have to be 21 to purchase a handgun. States can write laws stricter than federal law but they cannot write laws that are less restrictive than federal law.
Its 21 to purchase from an ffl dealer but public sales are legal I'm Missouri
enfieldaddict is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 03:35 AM   #62
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22310 Times on 12476 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Deer View Post
Federal law says you have to be 21 to purchase a handgun. States can write laws stricter than federal law but they cannot write laws that are less restrictive than federal law.
federal law applies to an FFL dealer. in Texas you can purchase a handgun from an individual in a private party sale. in some states a person over the age of 18 can legally open carry a pistol.
Axxe55 is offline  
SparkPlug Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 01:21 PM   #63
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Detroit,mi
Posts: 3,462
Liked 1341 Times on 793 Posts
Likes Given: 250

Default

Any of the "this is a false report" detractors watch the actual video yet and want to comment?

I understand the unedited version is even more damning, but I have not watched it. My blood was boiling after watching the edited video.
partdeux is offline  
bluez Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 06:06 PM   #64
I used to play keyboards, but now ...
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Balota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Glenpool, Oklahoma
Posts: 4,413
Liked 3229 Times on 1949 Posts
Likes Given: 3096

Default

I watched the edited version. That was enough for me. Here is what I saw: The officer got out of his car, drew his weapon at a large distance, commanded the subject to get on the ground (cold ground mind you), advanced on the subject with his gun pointed in the general direction of the subject AND directly at approaching vehicles. What was the officer going to do? Shoot through the vehicle if the subject moved? If I were the driver of that first vehicle I'd be considering legal action.

Walking around in public apparently talking to himself. That may have been part of the description from the person who called in the complaint. But the officer says at the beginning of the video he appears to be talking to himself. He says that from inside a police car over a block BEHIND the subject. He can't see his face, can't tell if he's talking at all, certainly can't hear him talking, has no idea what he's saying or doing.

Did you know there are people who pray out loud? They pray when they go for a drive, when they sit down in a restaurant to eat, and yes, even when they are just walking down the street. Is that illegal? Is that reasonable cause for an officer to draw his gun and command the subject to lay down on cold concrete for 10 minutes?

If the officer had approached the subject to determine what he was doing, found that he was behaving irrationally or threateningly, and decided to detain and disarm him, this would not be an issue. But the officer was the one behaving irrationally and threateningly.

I agree with the OP. Something needs to change in Grand Rapids if the officers are encouraged to handle this kind of situation in this way.
__________________
Balota
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
Practice does NOT make perfect. Practice makes permanent. Only perfect practice makes perfect.
Balota is online now  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 06:13 PM   #65
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22310 Times on 12476 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balota View Post
I watched the edited version. That was enough for me. Here is what I saw: The officer got out of his car, drew his weapon at a large distance, commanded the subject to get on the ground (cold ground mind you), advanced on the subject with his gun pointed in the general direction of the subject AND directly at approaching vehicles. What was the officer going to do? Shoot through the vehicle if the subject moved? If I were the driver of that first vehicle I'd be considering legal action.

Walking around in public apparently talking to himself. That may have been part of the description from the person who called in the complaint. But the officer says at the beginning of the video he appears to be talking to himself. He says that from inside a police car over a block BEHIND the subject. He can't see his face, can't tell if he's talking at all, certainly can't hear him talking, has no idea what he's saying or doing.

Did you know there are people who pray out loud? They pray when they go for a drive, when they sit down in a restaurant to eat, and yes, even when they are just walking down the street. Is that illegal? Is that reasonable cause for an officer to draw his gun and command the subject to lay down on cold concrete for 10 minutes?

If the officer had approached the subject to determine what he was doing, found that he was behaving irrationally or threateningly, and decided to detain and disarm him, this would not be an issue. But the officer was the one behaving irrationally and threateningly.

I agree with the OP. Something needs to change in Grand Rapids if the officers are encouraged to handle this kind of situation in this way.
i was not aware that talking to yourself was reason to detain someone.
Axxe55 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 06:42 PM   #66
I used to play keyboards, but now ...
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Balota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Glenpool, Oklahoma
Posts: 4,413
Liked 3229 Times on 1949 Posts
Likes Given: 3096

Default

Might depend on what you were saying. For example, "That's the last straw. I'm tired of my kids beating me at Candy Crush. I'm going home and shooting them with this here pistol so they'll never beat me again..." Something like that might be a reason to detain. But the officer in the video had no idea whether the guy was actually talking or not, much less what he was saying.
__________________
Balota
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
Practice does NOT make perfect. Practice makes permanent. Only perfect practice makes perfect.
Balota is online now  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 06:47 PM   #67
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22310 Times on 12476 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balota View Post
Might depend on what you were saying. For example, "That's the last straw. I'm tired of my kids beating me at Candy Crush. I'm going home and shooting them with this here pistol so they'll never beat me again..." Something like that might be a reason to detain. But the officer in the video had no idea whether the guy was actually talking or not, much less what he was saying.
exactly. if he couldn't hear the conversation, then how could he know the difference in the person reciting outloud their grocery list or making threats towards another person? answer, he couldn't.

i think the officer should have been more observant in his actions.
Axxe55 is offline  
SparkPlug Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 06:51 PM   #68
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North West,Maine
Posts: 384
Liked 95 Times on 68 Posts
Likes Given: 138

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaF View Post
When people abuse their right to free speech it generally ends up in an arrest for disturbing the peace.

All rights can be abused. When an individual abuses their rights, they lose them. When a group of individuals abuse their rights in a similar fashion, they lose them as a group. Right or wrong, good or bad, like it or not, that is how society works.

Keep causing a nuisance with guns, and we will keep giving the other side ammunition to use against us. And eventually we will lose our rights because we as a group failed to regulate ourselves through peer pressure and failed to strongly send the message that "these morons flashing AKs on the street corners and fighting with the police do NOT represent the gun owning community as a whole."
I would like to know how someone "abuses" a "Right". If it is my right, and I choose to display it, its not an abuse.
These cops on power trips, or the ones that don't even know the law them selves, are the abusers.
MaineMan is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 07:04 PM   #69
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22310 Times on 12476 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaineMan View Post
I would like to know how someone "abuses" a "Right". If it is my right, and I choose to display it, its not an abuse.
These cops on power trips, or the ones that don't even know the law them selves, are the abusers.
it hinges on the attitude the person has. plenty of YouTube videos of open carriers tyring to bait cops into acting wrongly and video taping the confrontations.

how about the guy who goes to the grocery store with an AR or an AK strapped across his back? the guy is looking to make a statement, not excercise his rights.

i'm sorry, but there is a huge difference in excercising your rights and acting like a douchebag. how you approach doing something and a person's attitude when they are confronted are the key factors.
Axxe55 is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2014, 07:11 PM   #70
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
enfieldaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 73
Liked 24 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axxe55 View Post

it hinges on the attitude the person has. plenty of YouTube videos of open carriers tyring to bait cops into acting wrongly and video taping the confrontations.

how about the guy who goes to the grocery store with an AR or an AK strapped across his back? the guy is looking to make a statement, not excercise his rights.

i'm sorry, but there is a huge difference in excercising your rights and acting like a douchebag. how you approach doing something and a person's attitude when they are confronted are the key factors.
I've seen it locally at a local Walt mart they made a good cop look bad
enfieldaddict is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Best AR's under a grand kjbcruz12 AR-15 Discussion 49 03-21-2014 11:42 PM
Open Carry vs Concealed Carry - a comprehensive response to critics IdahoCarry General Handgun Discussion 35 10-23-2013 07:43 PM
Grand Rapids gun and knife show. fupuk Michigan Gun Forum 0 06-09-2012 09:00 AM
Grand Rapids gun shows boltaction Michigan Gun Forum 7 02-21-2012 12:04 AM
Open carrier in California being harrassed by cops kwikrnu Legal and Activism 63 10-26-2011 01:16 AM



Newest Threads