You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

GOA Take Action

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2012, 06:46 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
canebrake's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 150 miles NE of Sloppy Joe's Bar
Posts: 21,941
Liked 1482 Times on 824 Posts
Likes Given: 1290

Default GOA Take Action

Gun Owners of America
Battle Raging on Capitol Hill
with regard to Concealed Carry

If you have ever questioned whether your emails and phone calls make a difference, then stop wondering.

Your activism on the concealed carry bills in the U.S. Senate is doing a bang-up job!

Gun Owners of America has been working with the sponsors of the soon-to-be-introduced Thune-Vitter reciprocity bill, and we can report that there are at least 15 cosponsors on the bill!

By contrast, the Begich-Manchin Democrat compromise bill (S. 2188) has only one additional cosponsor.

Senators John Thune (R-SD) and David Vitter (R-LA) plan to introduce their bill early next week -- and thus, their bill won’t receive a number until then.

But we need a whole new round of emails to get even more original cosponsors on their bill. Again, the Thune-Vitter legislation will not only allow permit holders to carry out-of-state, but NON-PERMIT HOLDERS from constitutional carry states, as well.

Sadly, we have been receiving emails from our grassroots activists showing that the NRA is taking aim at our position on these two bills.

Hence, we would like to make the following points in order to prevent any confusion.

1. NRA POSITION: “There is no Thune-Vitter bill because one hasn’t been introduced. Therefore, it is impossible to ‘support the Thune-Vitter bill rather than the Democrat-sponsored S. 2188.’”

GOA RESPONSE: As stated above, Senators Thune and Vitter are currently gaining cosponsors before the actual introduction of their bill. This is a common practice that legislators use in order to make a “big splash” with a large number of original cosponsors. For anyone who works on Capitol Hill to claim ignorance of this process is, quite honestly, laughable.

2. NRA POSITION: The Begich-Manchin bill “does not undermine or abandon permitless carry. Groups suggesting this are simply lying or incapable of reading the bill. Residents of Vermont, or any other ‘Constitutional Carry’ state, who wish to carry out of state could simply obtain a nonresident permit (just as they do now) and enjoy the benefits of S. 2188.”

GOA RESPONSE: Subsection (c)(2)(B) of S. 2188 requires that anyone benefiting from carry reciprocity possess “a valid license or permit that ... permits the individual to carry a concealed firearm.”

In other words, S. 2188 fails to protect NON-PERMIT HOLDERS in constitutional carry states -- and these gun owners represent the MAJORITY of law-abiding citizens who can carry.

There are currently five states where citizens can carry without the government’s permission: Vermont, Alaska, Arizona, Wyoming, and most of Montana. And the South Dakota Governor currently has a bill sitting on his desk to enable citizens to carry guns without prior government permission.

In addition to all of this, there are eleven states which are seriously considering “constitutional carry” legislation: Colorado, Iowa, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina and Virginia.

Many more states will move in this direction after the beginning of the year.

But what if the federal government holds up an enormous “carrot” for pro-gun activists to obtain permits, irrespective of whether their states require it? The answer is that the incentive for these activists to push for “constitutional carry” will vanish.

S. 2188 will snub non-permit holders in “constitutional carry” states, while the Thune-Vitter bill will grant reciprocity to them.

Unless one thinks that New York’s crime problems result from “vicious killers” from Vermont, Alaska and the other constitutional carry states, then there shouldn’t be a problem enabling average citizens to carry concealed without permits. After all, criminals don’t line up for carry licenses.

3. NRA POSITION: “S. 2188 would not ... impose national standards.”

GOA RESPONSE: Well, GOA never said it did. And thankfully, this is an issue where GOA can claim victory, as previous reciprocity bills over the past several years have included such “national standards.” But this is just another example of how your activism makes a real difference!

Both Begich and Manchin HAVE YET TO CAST A PRO-GUN VOTE during this Congress. (You can check this out by viewing their voting records on the GOA website.) So why would we trust them to do the right thing on gun legislation? Is this just an attempt to reelect Democrats and keep Harry Reid in power?

ACTION: Please click HERE to urge your U.S. Senators to cosponsor the Thune-Vitter bill over the Begich-Manchin bill.

Get her dirty, then clean her so she starts to respect you. When her trust is complete, she will serve you well for a lifetime!

"...if doves shot back, there wouldn't be a need for a bag limit."
- orangello
canebrake is offline  
american121 Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 03-16-2012, 08:15 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
mountainman13's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,525
Liked 2929 Times on 1724 Posts


Thanks for the info. I'll spread the word.
I don't need No stinking signature.
mountainman13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2012, 09:25 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Jpyle's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,844
Liked 784 Times on 453 Posts
Likes Given: 499


Great stuff Cane. Does the Thune-Vitter bill do anything to address residents from so called "may issue" states like New Jersey where most are forced to acquire noniresident CCW? Would NJ, for example, be required to honor a NJ resident's FL or UT non-resident CCW?
"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington
Jpyle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2012, 10:17 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
JTJ's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lake Havasu,Arizona
Posts: 9,338
Liked 5102 Times on 2754 Posts
Likes Given: 1649


I sent an email to the NRA objecting to the support for S2188.
Patron Member NRA
"I would not be an old man if I had not been an armed young man." JTJ
I was taught to respect my elders but they are getting harder to find.
JTJ is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2012, 04:38 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
GunAtty's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


Thanks for the info, I'm on board.
GunAtty is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2012, 07:28 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
MPGSr's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10

I am a GOA life member and wrote to my lawmakers about this. Sad part is i live in the nazi state of new jersey and my letters are sent to blind eyes. They care nothing about my opinion. I will never stop sending letters or voicing my opinion!
MPGSr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2012, 07:45 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
BigB's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,294
Liked 988 Times on 633 Posts
Likes Given: 392



Psalm 82:4 Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.
Isaiah 53:5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
BigB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2012, 07:52 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
dog2000tj's Avatar
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,310
Liked 3744 Times on 1829 Posts
Likes Given: 13286


Thanx 4 the heads up forwarded an email via the link
Member: NRA GOA

Est sularas oth mithas

"either way, you were guilty by association, so you were smited...." JD
dog2000tj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2012, 09:45 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
BenLuby's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 2,181
Liked 78 Times on 44 Posts
Likes Given: 8


E-Mail sent. Thanks for the info.
What part of 'shall not be infringed' confuses people?
BenLuby is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2012, 09:52 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
tomgodd's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: VineGrove,Kentucky
Posts: 1,241
Liked 380 Times on 266 Posts
Likes Given: 48


I'm in! Thanks

tomgodd is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Long Action vs Short Action falseharmonix General Rifle Discussion 20 02-05-2014 09:16 PM
Slide action vs. Revolving action PDW GlockUSA Semi-Auto Handguns 25 01-15-2012 04:40 AM
long action vs short action gutz47 General Rifle Discussion 10 11-24-2011 04:25 PM
Spring-Action or Pump-Action Grandy General Shotgun Discussion 3 03-13-2008 01:55 AM