Fred Thompsonís Anti-Gun Senate Record - Page 2
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Fred Thompsonís Anti-Gun Senate Record

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2007, 10:42 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
pioneer461's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 938
Liked 27 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

Yup, stand up for a sure loser, and we all lose.

Bill Clinton was elected TWICE, with just 43% of the vote. Why? Because a bunch of whiney republicans who didn't get their way, voted for Perot, on "principle." Perot (from Texas) was a ringer by the Clinton machine, who had no chance to win and disappered between elections. Are we now seeing another conservative Texas ringer by the Clinton machine? I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the Clinton machine is actually supporting Ron Paul.

I'd rather forgive Giuliani for his wayward past, than live under the so******t regime of another Klinton.

The Democrats just love it when we fight among ourselves.

__________________
Sui Juris
Cogito, ergo armatum sum
NRA Life Member / SAF Member
Retired Police Detective '71-'01 / LEOSA Certified
Naval Aviation Veteran '65-'69

United States Constitution (c) 1791
All Rights Reserved
pioneer461 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 05:43 AM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pioneer461 View Post
I'd rather forgive Giuliani for his wayward past, than live under the so******t regime of another Klinton.
You need to stop watching Faux News. If ANYbody gets elected other than RP, we are going to have more marxism.
__________________
WARNING: CZs MAY BE HABIT-FORMING.
Consult your doctor if nursing or pregnant.

Member GCO
Chuck is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 10:18 PM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
cnorman18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 457
Liked 24 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default no chance

Get out of the Ron Paul handbasket and take a good look at Mike Huckabee. Best candidate in the field.

I'm not opposed to Paul because he has no chance; I'm opposed to his stand on the issues. I believe in the Constitution, but I believe in other things too--like common sense.

Other than gun control, many of his other positions might as well come from MoveOn.org. Forget it.

__________________

"Valor needs first strength, then a weapon."
-- J. R. R. Tolkien (1892-1973)

"Free men have arms; slaves do not."
-- William Blackstone (1723-1780)

cnorman18 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 10:48 PM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Pounce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 222
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

To each his own. Hand basket or whatever ya call it.. Ron Paul is the best out of the field.

__________________
Pounce is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 09:43 AM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
cnorman18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 457
Liked 24 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default we disagree

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pounce View Post
To each his own. Hand basket or whatever ya call it.. Ron Paul is the best out of the field.
We disagree there, and that's OK. But I'll tell you this, and you can take it to the bank: If he runs a 3rd-party campaign, he'll put Hillary in the White House, and if she gets to pick a couple of justices for the Supreme Court, you can kiss your guns goodbye.

And I'll tell you something else: if he does run, the Clintons will be funneling money to him through their backers. Remember Perot? Watch and see.
__________________

"Valor needs first strength, then a weapon."
-- J. R. R. Tolkien (1892-1973)

"Free men have arms; slaves do not."
-- William Blackstone (1723-1780)

cnorman18 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2007, 08:00 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Pounce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 222
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnorman18 View Post
We disagree there, and that's OK. But I'll tell you this, and you can take it to the bank: If he runs a 3rd-party campaign, he'll put Hillary in the White House, and if she gets to pick a couple of justices for the Supreme Court, you can kiss your guns goodbye.

And I'll tell you something else: if he does run, the Clintons will be funneling money to him through their backers. Remember Perot? Watch and see.
As you stated in the past, we disagree "STRONGLY".
Outside of the best voting record and (yhr only one) abiding buy the Constitution,( his voting record proves it) Just where would you say Mr. Paul is wrong?

I voted for Perot,went to see him talk. He did 'screw' it up. Perhaps on perpose. As far as the Clintons funneling Ron Paul money...well, what does one say to such nonsense?
__________________
Pounce is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 08:15 AM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
cnorman18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 457
Liked 24 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

"As you stated in the past, we disagree "STRONGLY".
Outside of the best voting record and (yhr only one) abiding buy the Constitution,( his voting record proves it) Just where would you say Mr. Paul is wrong?"

See new thread.


"I voted for Perot,went to see him talk. He did 'screw' it up. Perhaps on perpose. As far as the Clintons funneling Ron Paul money...well, what does one say to such nonsense?"

A 3rd-party campaign, a la Perot's, would be very much in the Clintons' interest. If you don't think they'd pull a few strings to make that happen, you haven't been paying attention. They have.

__________________

"Valor needs first strength, then a weapon."
-- J. R. R. Tolkien (1892-1973)

"Free men have arms; slaves do not."
-- William Blackstone (1723-1780)

cnorman18 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 03:09 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Pounce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 222
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnorman18 View Post
"As you stated in the past, we disagree "STRONGLY".
Outside of the best voting record and (yhr only one) abiding buy the Constitution,( his voting record proves it) Just where would you say Mr. Paul is wrong?"

See new thread.


"I voted for Perot,went to see him talk. He did 'screw' it up. Perhaps on perpose. As far as the Clintons funneling Ron Paul money...well, what does one say to such nonsense?"

A 3rd-party campaign, a la Perot's, would be very much in the Clintons' interest. If you don't think they'd pull a few strings to make that happen, you haven't been paying attention. They have.
Not paying attention, or not pulling "facts" off the wall. Nonsense is the 'key' word. Mr. Paul and the Clintons? You are not paying attention.
__________________
Pounce is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 03:32 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
cnorman18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 457
Liked 24 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pounce View Post
Not paying attention, or not pulling "facts" off the wall. Nonsense is the 'key' word. Mr. Paul and the Clintons? You are not paying attention.
So you don't think Hillary is ruthless enough to do it? Or maybe you think she's too dedicated to her "principles"...

The only "principle" to which the Clintons have any allegiance is power. I admit the idea seems far-fetched; but you can bet they're thinking about it.

I look forward to seeing you on the other thread.

(Still don't have my Saiga, BTW, but I'm working on it. Too bad they don't make .22 Saiga clones...)
__________________

"Valor needs first strength, then a weapon."
-- J. R. R. Tolkien (1892-1973)

"Free men have arms; slaves do not."
-- William Blackstone (1723-1780)

cnorman18 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 08:34 PM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Pounce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 222
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnorman18 View Post
So you don't think Hillary is ruthless enough to do it? Or maybe you think she's too dedicated to her "principles"...

I agree.

The only "principle" to which the Clintons have any allegiance is power. I admit the idea seems far-fetched; but you can bet they're thinking about it.

Yes,power and israel.

I look forward to seeing you on the other thread.

Been there.

(Still don't have my Saiga, BTW, but I'm working on it. Too bad they don't make .22 Saiga clones...)
Yup, much cheaper to shoot.
__________________
Pounce is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Fred Thompson PAC Blog Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 12-04-2008 07:20 AM
Fred Thompson speaks on the upcoming Election Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 10-25-2008 01:50 AM
Fred Thompson PAC Blog Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 09-10-2008 05:09 AM
From Former Senator Fred Thompson Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 0 09-03-2008 08:30 PM
Fred Thompson stlucian The Club House 14 07-12-2007 12:44 AM