Fort Hood soldiers told to list private weapons!
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Fort Hood soldiers told to list private weapons!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2010, 10:25 PM   #1
Coffee! If your not shaking, you need another cup
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Bigcountry02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Posts: 6,773
Liked 2103 Times on 1238 Posts
Likes Given: 4524

Default Fort Hood soldiers told to list private weapons!

It has begun! I knew this was going to start since that second shooting incident at Fort Hood. It says the soldiers are encouraged to register their weapons if they live off-post, more towards enforcement!

Next, it will be Government Civilians, Retirees and contractors!

Fort Hood soldiers told to list private weapons

The U.S. Army command at Fort Hood, where Muslim psychiatrist Nidal Malik Hasan allegedly shot and killed 13 people and an unborn child, now is demanding that its soldiers confess whether they have any guns in their off-base homes, what kind of guns they are and what are their serial numbers.

The action recalls similar disclosure demands on which WND has previously reported at Fort Bliss in Texas and Fort Campbell in Kentucky.

According to Christopher Haug Sr., the chief of media relations for Fort Hood, officials at the base issued an "operation order" that directed commanders "to reinforce Soldier Health and Wellness on Sept. 27."

"In this order, battalion commanders were directed to review all privately owned weapons registration. There is not a requirement to register off-post weapons but soldiers are encouraged to do so," Haug said.

"Commanders and leaders inquire about access to weapons as part of the health and welfare inspection. This is in accordance with Army Regulation 600-20, Army Command Policy dated March 18, 2008," he said.

But a soldier on base who contacted WND regarding the demand for information about off-base weapons said that's not the way it was presented to soldiers.

"At the end of the day formation … we were all required to state whether we owned a firearm. Then those that owned firearms were required to have their names put on a watch list that included registration status of the firearms and where the firearms were kept," wrote the soldier, who asked for anonymity to avoid retaliation.

"The list included those … who live off post in privately owned homes," the soldier confirmed.

"I feel like I have been violated and my 2nd Amendment rights infringed," the soldier wrote. "Last year Homeland Security said that veterans are a potential threat to the country, now I and many others in my unit are on a watch list because we own guns."

The soldier said the actions were taken against soldiers throughout the brigade. Further, the soldier reported the lists of those with guns were assembled and passed out to various individuals on the base.

"My platoon sergeant is very upset because he does not want everyone to know what he has in his private residence," the soldier said.

Fort Hood officials did not respond to specific WND questions about the "lists" that were compiled and to whom the lists were given.

In a WND commentary on the Food Hood issues, John Eidsmoe and Ben DuPré, both serving as legal counsel for the Foundation for Moral Law, argued it is not guns that kill, it is people who control guns, contrary to the socially correct perspective that the fault rests with the weapon.

"By this twist of logic, America's love of airplanes led to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The solution to stopping the 9/11 Islamic terrorists, you see, was fewer people in fewer airplanes in fewer places," they wrote.

"All such 'gun-control,' which the Brady-Campaign-types support, did nothing to stop Hasan from sneaking in two personal handguns. Killers with no regard for others' lives are hardly going to blink at anti-gun rules. Gun control only controls the law-abiding," they said.

"Fort Hood had an unarmed population living under a deadly combination of a false sense of security and no means of self-defense. While soldiers should never have to worry about attacks from one of their own, forcing them to be unarmed makes them more vulnerable to traitors and saboteurs than the embattled enemy. Maj. Hasan knew this, and to maximize his evil plot he did not attack the armed MPs – he attacked dozens of soldiers and officers at the Soldier Readiness Center who he knew would be unarmed. And they were unarmed precisely because of the 'gun-control' measures at Fort Hood," they wrote.

Further, Gerard Valentino of the Buckeye Firearms Foundation added in a separate commentary that soldiers need to be allowed to be armed.

"The victims were in a place where legal concealed carry is prohibited. The soldiers were disarmed in the same manner as the students at Columbine, or the students at Virginia Tech. The sad fact is that regardless of whether you go to a victim zone in a military uniform or dressed in ill-fitting clothes of the average college student, you are at an undue risk because the criminal will be the only one with a gun when the shooting starts," he wrote.

"The real question is why soldiers trained to carry a gun in combat are disarmed while going about their daily business when they are one of the prime targets of terrorism. While nobody wants fully armed soldiers marching down Main Street, USA, allowing them the same right to carry civilians are afforded is morally and legally just," he continued. "Leaving any American without a means of self-defense while a spree killer plies his trade is simply wrong, whether the victim is a civilian or soldier."

WND's report earlier documented how a "Weapons Registration Form" at Fort Bliss required a long list of information about any private weapons, including the location stored and barrel description.

At that time, base public information officer Jean Offutt told WND that registration of privately owned weapons is suggested and recommended, but there's no enforcement procedures available to the military if someone chooses not to submit the off-post information.

However, the form used for the registrations stated in one paragraph, "Soldiers who reside off post will register all privately owned weapons/firearms with the PMO. This requirement applies whether or not the service member intends to bring the weapon onto the installation for any recreational or other use."

The report about the weapons registration program at Fort Campbell came several months earlier.

Second Amendment advocates have been alarmed, since President Obama took office, by a series of actions, including his advocacy of an international treaty that could require those who reload their ammunition to obtain federal permits.

There also have been several legislative proposals introduced in Congress, including one that would require a fee and fingerprints for a type of national registration of guns.

WND also reported when the Department of Homeland Security issued a report titled "Right-wing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment," that stated, "Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists."
Bigcountry02 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 09-30-2010, 11:55 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,948
Liked 2530 Times on 1390 Posts
Likes Given: 4014

Default

Another rant from World Net Daily. For decades soldiers living on post have been required to register their private firearms. Soldiers living off post must register any firearms that they wish to bring on base for target shooting or hunting.

I'm retired Army. I hunt and shoot on a nearby Army post. The guns that I bring on post are registered at the Firearm and Vehicle Registration Branch. Registration is in a Pentagon database. There is nothing on the form that says that a soldier who lives off post must register his weapons.

Get caught with a concealed weapon an an Army post and you get a quick trip to the local US magistrate.
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 12:00 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 38 Times on 32 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alsaqr View Post
Another rant from World Net Daily. For decades soldiers living on post have been required to register their private firearms. Soldiers living off post must register any firearms that they wish to bring on base for target shooting or hunting.

I'm retired Army. I hunt and shoot on a nearby Army post. The guns that I bring on post are registered at the Firearm and Vehicle Registration Branch. Registration is in a Pentagon database. There is nothing on the form that says that a soldier who lives off post must register his weapons.

Get caught with a concealed weapon an an Army post and you get a quick trip to the local US magistrate.
Quoted for the dam truth.

Maybe some people should check FACTS before posting JUNK. Just saying.

That was the way it was when I was in from 1997 to 2003.
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 12:55 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Denver,Colorado
Posts: 451
Liked 15 Times on 6 Posts

Default

There was a lot of typo's in that post. Also I am wondering what "Barrel Description" has to do with registering your firearm.
(Well my firearm has a barrel that is round with a hole in the middle)
That ought to tell it all.
Sarge257
sarge_257 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 02:43 AM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 17,999
Liked 10545 Times on 4554 Posts
Likes Given: 1691

Default

There WAS one overzealous company commander that gave an order requiring SMs living off post to register their firearms.

When brought to the attention of higher command, it was countermanded.

I suspect the commander read about that on his OER under the heading of "Judgement". NOT career enhancing move.

BTW, this wasat Ft. Campbell KY, Charlie Company, 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment.
__________________
What we have here is... failure- to communicate.
c3shooter is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 04:52 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
IGETEVEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tornado \"Just Blow Me\" Alley,Oklahoma U.S.A.
Posts: 8,424
Liked 27 Times on 21 Posts

Default

Fort Campbell in Kentucky, is the proud home of the only Air Assault Division in the world, the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault). They are also the home of two prestigious Special Operations Command units, the 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne) and the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Airborne).

I am willing to safely venture that there ain't a whole lot of sharing and registering privately owned weapons information among these "soldiers" at all, the same goes for Ft. Bragg military personnel, as well.
__________________
Jack

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!

"There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter." - Hemingway

“The greatest ignorance is to reject something you know nothing about.”
IGETEVEN is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 05:21 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
skullcrusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ohio,Ohio
Posts: 10,949
Liked 18 Times on 12 Posts

Default

The MEN have spoken.

This thread can be shut down anytime soon.

This one has been around for a long time. Fact check it.
__________________
From C3Shooter:
Skullcrusher, you are evil, sick, demented, twisted- and my hero!


Quote:
Originally Posted by pandamonium View Post
...without the Second, we cannot protect the rest!
skullcrusher is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
President Bush Response to Fort Hood Jo da Plumbr Politics, Religion and Controversy 8 02-02-2010 07:15 PM
The Fort Hood Shooter Lives Kelly J Politics, Religion and Controversy 22 11-11-2009 01:28 AM
Fort Bliss soldiers told to register private guns Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 06-08-2009 12:29 AM
Soldiers told to 'register' firearms Angrypoonani Politics, Religion and Controversy 11 05-07-2009 10:54 PM
Military demands details on soldiers' private guns Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 12 03-22-2009 11:17 PM



Newest Threads