Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Florida lawmakers want to expand SYG law

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2013, 11:25 PM   #31
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Deep East Texas Pineywoods!
Posts: 28,208
Liked 20921 Times on 11885 Posts
Likes Given: 52455

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc3402 View Post
I always figured that deadly force was for imminent risk of death or great bodily harm. The operative word to me was imminent. If I am at imminent risk I don't think I want to take a warning shot.

Here's the part that I think is going to hurt us. Where warning shots were illegal, what is going to happen now? I can see some poor slob that had to shoot to live trying to explain from the witness stand why he didn't fire a warning shot. I can see the jury being swayed by the fact that he didn't try to scare off his attacker first. This reeks.
that's a good point Doc. not one i considered either. and i can see your point and if in a case it got as far as a trial, it could be possible for them to use it against a person, for not firing a warning shot first.

a lot will depend on how the statute is written.
__________________
Coming from the Village of the Damned.
To the victor, go the spoils of war.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2013, 11:33 PM   #32
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 2,831
Liked 1767 Times on 988 Posts
Likes Given: 1302

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axxe55 View Post
that's a good point Doc. not one i considered either. and i can see your point and if in a case it got as far as a trial, it could be possible for them to use it against a person, for not firing a warning shot first.

a lot will depend on how the statute is written.
Knowing them they will just amend the SYG statute and call it a day. That could end up being very bad.
__________________
Doc3402 is offline  
Axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 12:58 AM   #33
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
1911love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,474
Liked 638 Times on 385 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc3402 View Post

I always figured that deadly force was for imminent risk of death or great bodily harm. The operative word to me was imminent. If I am at imminent risk I don't think I want to take a warning shot.

Here's the part that I think is going to hurt us. Where warning shots were illegal, what is going to happen now? I can see some poor slob that had to shoot to live trying to explain from the witness stand why he didn't fire a warning shot. I can see the jury being swayed by the fact that he didn't try to scare off his attacker first. This reeks.
My thoughts exactly. IMO warning shots are bad 99% of the time.
__________________
1911love is online now  
Axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
The Lunacy Of Our Anti-Gun Lawmakers! HankStone Legal and Activism 11 04-07-2013 01:25 AM
Florida Lawmakers want guns in schools danf_fl Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 03-29-2013 12:44 PM
Take that you local anti-gun lawmakers! canebrake Legal and Activism 20 09-12-2011 11:37 AM
Florida lawmakers pass "take your guns to work" law sculker The Club House 2 04-10-2008 04:34 PM