Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Florida lawmakers want to expand SYG law

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2013, 11:25 PM   #31
War and Peace
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Texas by God, Texas!
Posts: 24,476
Liked 16853 Times on 9764 Posts
Likes Given: 43911

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc3402 View Post
I always figured that deadly force was for imminent risk of death or great bodily harm. The operative word to me was imminent. If I am at imminent risk I don't think I want to take a warning shot.

Here's the part that I think is going to hurt us. Where warning shots were illegal, what is going to happen now? I can see some poor slob that had to shoot to live trying to explain from the witness stand why he didn't fire a warning shot. I can see the jury being swayed by the fact that he didn't try to scare off his attacker first. This reeks.
that's a good point Doc. not one i considered either. and i can see your point and if in a case it got as far as a trial, it could be possible for them to use it against a person, for not firing a warning shot first.

a lot will depend on how the statute is written.
__________________
Coming from the Village of the Damned.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2013, 11:33 PM   #32
Lifetime Supporting Member
FTF_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Doc3402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 2,818
Liked 1732 Times on 976 Posts
Likes Given: 1298

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axxe55 View Post
that's a good point Doc. not one i considered either. and i can see your point and if in a case it got as far as a trial, it could be possible for them to use it against a person, for not firing a warning shot first.

a lot will depend on how the statute is written.
Knowing them they will just amend the SYG statute and call it a day. That could end up being very bad.
__________________
Accidents don't just happen. They must be carelessly planned.
Doc3402 is offline  
Axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2013, 12:58 AM   #33
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
1911love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,426
Liked 608 Times on 365 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc3402 View Post

I always figured that deadly force was for imminent risk of death or great bodily harm. The operative word to me was imminent. If I am at imminent risk I don't think I want to take a warning shot.

Here's the part that I think is going to hurt us. Where warning shots were illegal, what is going to happen now? I can see some poor slob that had to shoot to live trying to explain from the witness stand why he didn't fire a warning shot. I can see the jury being swayed by the fact that he didn't try to scare off his attacker first. This reeks.
My thoughts exactly. IMO warning shots are bad 99% of the time.
__________________
1911love is offline  
Axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
The Lunacy Of Our Anti-Gun Lawmakers! HankStone Legal and Activism 11 04-07-2013 01:25 AM
Florida Lawmakers want guns in schools danf_fl Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 03-29-2013 12:44 PM
Take that you local anti-gun lawmakers! canebrake Legal and Activism 20 09-12-2011 11:37 AM
Florida lawmakers pass "take your guns to work" law sculker The Club House 2 04-10-2008 04:34 PM