Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > "Fix" the Second Amendment, huh?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2014, 06:36 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 3,113
Liked 910 Times on 603 Posts
Likes Given: 564

Default "Fix" the Second Amendment, huh?

<a href='http://www.newser.com/story/185223/judge-stevens-5-words-can-fix-2nd-amendment.html?utm_source=newser&utm_medium=embed& utm_campaign=story' target='_blank'><img style='width:240px;border-width:0px;' alt='' src='http://img2-cdn.newser.com/square-image/185223-20140411185224/judge-stevens-5-words-can-fix-2nd-amendment.jpeg'></a>

I ran across this in Newser just now. I wasn't aware that there was anything wrong with it. Re-reading it just now, the 2nd doesn't appear to be very clear as to it's INTENT. Maybe back when it was written, it was, I don't know. Are there any other supporting texts that clarify whet, exactly they were thinking about when the wrote it? As I understand it, they meant for the people to have guns if they wanted, and to form Militias, if they wanted, in order to keep the Federal Govt. from getting out of control. But the actual text doesn't really say that....

Opinions?

__________________

I don't see what the problem is. Everybody is being nice, and getting along, and I, for one, am learning stuff. So, if you don't like the discussion, don't look at the thread. Or, simply cut to the chase, and close it.
_________________
Is there an age limit for a thread, after which we kill it?

clr8ter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 04-12-2014, 08:03 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Overkill0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,194
Liked 2696 Times on 1343 Posts
Likes Given: 263

Default

I remember this from some time back. I think Stevens published a paper or did a speech, but whatever. He was wrong then, he's wrong now.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-five-extra-words-that-can-fix-the-second-amendment/2014/04/11/f8a19578-b8fa-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html?hpid=z1

He may have a wall full of fancy sheepskins, but he don't know jack about militias in the context of the founding.

Quote:
“a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
That aside, even if one looks at it and thinks the militia is some sort of dessert, the final phrase "The right of the people to keep & bear arms, shall not be infringed" should shut the door on any further shenanigans.

Quote:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed.”
Douchenozzle's revision actually reverses the intent of the founders.

The founders considered "a well regulated militia" to be a necessary evil, thus an armed populace was considered necessary to prevent oppression by said "well regulated militia."
Local militias prior to the revolution were pretty informal affairs. Show up after church, drill a bit, talk some smack and finish up with a couple pints before heading back home. As I understand things, "well regulated Militia" is founder-speak for an army or probably more correctly, what we would consider the national guard. Which by any reasonable standard is an arm of a potentially oppressive government.

Modern Liberalism attempts to change the meaning of what seems like a fairly simple phrase.
If I were to have the opportunity to edit the 2nd amendment, I would simplify it so that even a liberal supreme court justice could understand it:
Quote:
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Note: I don't have an Ivy league law degree (or any constitutional law training for that matter. Hell, I didn't even stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night), so take it as you will.

Edit - Another take on the issue:
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/04/12/john-paul-stevens-helpfully-rewrites-the-constitution-for-you/

Quote:
All in all, a better title for this book would be, Six Reasons You Should Thank God I’m Not on the Bench Anymore. Even if Stevens’ replacement wasn’t any better, this is a prime example of the kinds of “thinking” which will be in favor when the court sees a solid majority of such “thinkers” at SCOTUS. The sub-title for the book could have read, “My plan to finally edit that pesky Constitution and remake America the way I think it should be.”
__________________
Cheers,
Greg
USAF Retired
NRA Life Member

"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman

Last edited by Overkill0084; 04-13-2014 at 01:49 PM.
Overkill0084 is offline  
eatmydust Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 08:09 PM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,368
Liked 5464 Times on 2854 Posts
Likes Given: 354

Default

The well regulated militia gives each individual state the gaurantee the federal government cannot disarm the state. The section about right of the people to keep and bear arms ensures the federal government and states cannot disarm we the individual people.

It does two things preserving the rights of the states and the rights of the citizen to keep and bear arms.

Nothing ambiguous about it. Its clear as crystal and only the worst stripe of oppressive totalitarian sees any ambiguity there.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
9
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 08:28 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
kryptar19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: arkansas
Posts: 1,730
Liked 621 Times on 368 Posts
Likes Given: 1579

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
The well regulated militia gives each individual state the gaurantee the federal government cannot disarm the state. The section about right of the people to keep and bear arms ensures the federal government and states cannot disarm we the individual people.

It does two things preserving the rights of the states and the rights of the citizen to keep and bear arms.

Nothing ambiguous about it. Its clear as crystal and only the worst stripe of oppressive totalitarian sees any ambiguity there.
Never been said better.
__________________
kryptar19 is offline  
Cnon Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 08:31 PM   #5
Devil's Advocate and Provocateur
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TekGreg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cincinnati,OH
Posts: 1,862
Liked 1315 Times on 688 Posts
Likes Given: 605

Default

The Founders' Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms by Stephen P. Halbrook was one of two books used by the Supreme Court in overturning recent legislation meant to change the intent of the Second Amendment. It is a highly fascinating read with references to other documents written at that time that were clear to the intent of the Founders when the Bill of Rights was written.

To be clear, the term "Militia" as the Founders referred to is every able-bodied (not senile or unable to hold a gun) man and boy (old enough to function a gun, generally considered to have a minimum age around 12-14) able to fire a weapon and capable of understanding commands. It had nothing to do with state-formed militias or state's rights to form a guard unit, and it most certainly NEVER was to be a power controlled by the federal government.

It's primary purpose was to make the largest defensive force available to defend the colonies from invaders. However, its secondary purpose was to overthrow a corrupt dictator should he gain power in America and, as such, not under government control. The Founders felt that the second amendment would keep a King from ever getting into power and installing a government that was dictatorial in nature. The term "militia" was used to refer to organized units that would take orders from a just command structure, not to refer to discontented bands of marauders just shooting politicians for fun and profit. "Militia" differentiates between criminal activity and an organized overthrow of a corrupt government.

For these reasons, The Second Amendment was kept intentionally short so as not to be misinterpreted or ambiguous. Therefore, all these attempts at "clarifying" the Amendment are just more gun control propaganda to erode the rights preserved for us by the Founders.
__________________

.
.
“Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem." (I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.). Thomas Jefferson

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."

-Edmund Burke, Loosely translated from Thoughts on the Cause of Present Discontents. (1770)

TekGreg is offline  
4
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 08:40 PM   #6
-06
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 125
Liked 34 Times on 24 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

"They" can interpret it anyway they like but in the end the meaning comes from the smoking end of a firearm. That is the reason it is there---not for hunting rights, not for national guard/etc., but for the militia(those able to carry a rifle and have the guts to use it).

__________________
-06 is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 08:49 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,278
Liked 2049 Times on 1109 Posts
Likes Given: 3083

Default

Justice Stevens was a "moderately conservative" justice. Stevens was appointed to SCOTUS by president Ford.

Changing the BOR requires a Constutional Amendment. Thankfully, it won't happen any time soon, if ever.

__________________
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:22 PM   #8
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 28,199
Liked 20886 Times on 11873 Posts
Likes Given: 52444

Default

notning complicated to interpret behind the words. clear as a bell.

rather funny that children have no problem understanding something that adults can't comprehend.

so what part needs fixing? nothing!

__________________
Coming from the Village of the Damned.
To the victor, go the spoils of war.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:34 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
toroboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 116
Liked 54 Times on 38 Posts

Default

The "fixing" part that's needed would require "neutering" anyone who thinks the 2A is in need of being rewritten...


You can't be a pimp and a prostitute too...

__________________

Roads less traveled...

toroboy is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:37 AM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
John_Deer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,818
Liked 1487 Times on 1006 Posts
Likes Given: 513

Default

People need to get over the idea that morality can be legislated. We can keep an orderly society but we can't make people behave.

I dunno with the way the war on drugs is working maybe we should let guns be outlawed. Then everyone will have a gun and the price will drop by half.

__________________

Nothing in the affairs of men is worthy of great anxiety - Plato

John_Deer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
How to "Ghost Load" or "Carrier Load" or "Float a Round" a Shotgun Amsdorf General Shotgun Discussion 19 02-21-2014 05:35 AM
"Farmers' Almanac" predicts a "bitterly cold" winter Bigcountry02 The Club House 39 01-30-2014 04:24 AM
Pres. Obama "Fired Up" and Ready to Repeal Second Amendment Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 11 09-25-2013 12:38 PM
"Do "Gun-Free" Zones Encourage School Shootings?" cnorman18 The Club House 26 04-17-2012 09:57 PM
Witloe Remington 1858 New Model Army "Lee" & "Grant" bprevolver Blackpowder & Musket 0 09-25-2008 11:11 PM



Newest Threads