firearms in military... - Page 5


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > firearms in military...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2011, 12:00 AM   #41
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jismail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 234
Liked 35 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

I think that a good thread with good contributors deserves to be resurected regardless of it's age.



__________________
jismail is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 12:08 AM   #42
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,152
Liked 23 Times on 7 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jismail View Post
I think that a good thread with good contributors deserves to be resurected regardless of it's age.
Well, I reckon the mods will have to remove the "don't bump dead threads" from the newcomers guide. When you bump these old threads you do realize that many of the folks that posted don't come here anymore correct?


__________________
NGIB is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 12:55 AM   #43
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jismail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 234
Liked 35 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

I have no issue with the mods deleting my post if it goes against policy.

__________________
jismail is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2011, 01:10 AM   #44
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Kimber45's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 261
Default

I asked a GI out of Ft. Lewis the other day his thoughts on the AR platform . . . . "IT SUCKS!" OK, expand on that, please. He laughed, said in most states you can't use the .223 to hunt deer and deer don't shoot back, so imagine yourself in a fire fight against people who are doing there best to kill you and Uncle Sam issues you a weapon that isn't big enough to hunt deer with. He also said they are talking about going to a 6.8 round but that the 6.8 lacked speed and distance capabilities. So what round/rifle do you suggest, I asked? The 7.62 NATO in a modern M-14 with a plastic/synthetic stock. In a carbine version, 16" barrel, it would be accurate out to 600 yards and capable of killing at that distance which is extremely doubtful in a 5.56.

I've spoken to guys back from the sand box that feel pretty much the same way, the round is too light to guarantee killing another human being, unless shot multiple times. Another offered, when shooting to hit something it is good to know what you shot isn't going to get back up and shoot back. Why expend multiple rounds? Insurance.
Me? I like the AR, have two and a bolt gun in .223 that I use of ground squirrels, coyote, etc. My reach out and touch something rifle is a 700 Remington in .308. Been looking at the R-25 and Springfields . . . Ain't made up me mind on either yet.

__________________

If you love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen. — Samuel Adams

Kimber45 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2011, 04:46 PM   #45
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New Orleans,Louisiana
Posts: 28
Default

Anyone ever thought about the HK 417?



__________________
Scoobydoo51 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Obama cutting military and the Russian military is parading! Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 4 05-10-2009 04:58 AM
Jokes about the Military McNabb11b The Club House 13 03-03-2009 03:31 AM
Military Firearms websites Slickrick214 The Club House 9 11-08-2008 04:13 AM
Who in here is ex-military or currently in? Tony Soprano The Club House 37 01-15-2008 03:31 AM
military .22? jo_nathan1980 .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 4 10-03-2007 02:56 AM