firearms in military...


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > firearms in military...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2007, 11:44 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9
Default firearms in military...

So, what is the most popular gun that people like in for warfare. I know there are the common rifles which are given, but what are the preffered guns?

Any vets care to share?



__________________
ckbig is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 04-16-2007, 01:57 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
allmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Athens
Posts: 364
Default I am an old guy, so I know that no one liked the M16

initially for combat. The US army had the M14 ( 7.62 NATO ) and were very impressed with the performance. When they introduced the M 16 in quantity, lots of problems with jams, stovepipes, failure to fire.

Some of the bodies of GI's collected after fire fights had a useless black toy rifle lying nearby that had experienced some sort of failure.

I know that the black rifles have had multiple improvements since the 60's and 70's, but the overly complicated gas system makes less sense to me than a direct gas piston, such as the AK or the Mini 14 or the famous M 14.

If I absolutely had to go to combat at my advanced age, I would have to choose the AK platform for sheer reliability.



__________________
allmons is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 03:15 PM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BrassMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SW Illinois
Posts: 325
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts

Default

The AK and AR pattern rifles are the two most common rifle in military service today. The AK has the most widespread use. I prefer the AR for the accuracy, weight, ergonomics, and faster magazine changes myself.

__________________
BrassMonkey is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 03:25 PM   #4
Administrator
FTF_ADMIN.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
notdku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hill Country,Texas
Posts: 5,563
Liked 699 Times on 387 Posts
Likes Given: 729

Default

I remember reading awhile back the AK platform has been the most produced firearm ever.

__________________
notdku is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2007, 03:46 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,996
Liked 710 Times on 488 Posts
Likes Given: 730

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kau View Post
I remember reading awhile back the AK platform has been the most produced firearm ever.
That is a "fact". I also prefer the AR platform for the reasons given. The early M16 issues were do to design changes and powder changes set by the Ordnance Division of the day. Had they left the design intact, many soldiers would have come home. It was a pissing contest between the Military brass and Kennedy's wizz kids.
__________________
jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2007, 03:13 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
allmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Athens
Posts: 364
Default Indeed, the .223 has proven itself a good combat

round for most uses, and the AR platform has been improved ( or perhaps returned to Eugene Stoner's original concept ).

My active military friends in Iraq like the AR platform, but would like an arm that would engage a target at a greater distance. Not sure I understand that thought, as they have the SAW and the snipers still shoot .308 ( or bigger)
ammunition.

All I can give you is my limited military experience, and I found the M16 hard to keep clean in a dirty environment. I lost a lot of confidence in the Colt made military firearm I carried. My Sergeant did remind us - often - that all our equipment came from the lowest bidder!

__________________
allmons is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 06:30 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Default

During the Vietnam war the Australian infantry were initially armed with the GPMG M60, the Australian designed and manufactured 9mm Owen gun (SMG) and the L1A1 SLR, semi-auto rifle in 7.62 Nato - a slightly modiifed semi-auto only version of the Belgium FN-FAL produced in Australia utilising a 20rd mag.

The Owen gun later gave way to the M16 but the SLR remained our main battle rifle throughout the conflict. It was cherished by the troops and gave an honest account of itself. Accurate, reliable, hard-hitting, easy to maintain and shoot.

I daresay many US veterans feel the same way about the M14. Old flames are never forgotten.

The SLR eventually gave way to the tupperware Steyr AUG in 5.56 Nato and is currently issued to all troops, with the exception of the SAS who always appear to be carrying M4s (says a lot). The standard sidearm was, and is today, the Browning Hi- power in 9mm.

IMHO the SLR was one of the best main battle rifles of my military era (69/70) and I would gladly use it again today - but this time with an optical sight and the heavy barrel usually fitted to the L2A2 (unsuccessful full Auto, 30rd heavy barrel, Bipod model).

__________________
Tango1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 11:25 AM   #8
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BrassMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SW Illinois
Posts: 325
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts

Default

Quote:
The SLR eventually gave way to the tupperware Steyr AUG in 5.56 Nato and is currently issued to all troops, with the exception of the SAS who always appear to be carrying M4s (says a lot).
The AUG never seems to get any respect. I have never had the chance to handle one. Can anybody tell me why they have such a negative reputation?
__________________
BrassMonkey is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2007, 12:06 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Default

Handles nicely, integral optic sight and easy to train new shooters with. However those I have spoken with in the military claim they don't handle sustained fire too well, nor sandy, dusty environments.

I have no personal experience with the Steyr other than handling one, but that's what the troopies tell me.

__________________
Tango1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 11:23 AM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BrassMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SW Illinois
Posts: 325
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts

Default

Quote:
The AUG is also fugly as hell, but not nearly so as the French FAMAS.
The French call the FAMAS "Le Clarion" french language for the bugle as its profile resembles one somewhat.


__________________
BrassMonkey is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Obama cutting military and the Russian military is parading! Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 4 05-10-2009 03:58 AM
Jokes about the Military McNabb11b The Club House 13 03-03-2009 02:31 AM
Military Firearms websites Slickrick214 The Club House 9 11-08-2008 03:13 AM
Who in here is ex-military or currently in? Tony Soprano The Club House 37 01-15-2008 02:31 AM
military .22? jo_nathan1980 .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 4 10-03-2007 01:56 AM