[dog2000tj]

Originally Posted by cottontop

There does not have to be a bill. Nothing has to go through congress. The president can pass and/or order a law through executive privilidge. It will happen. Get used to it.
cottontop

you may want to do some reading - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege

[robocop10mm]

I agree. Executive orders do not have the effect of LAW. He cannot unilaterally ldeclare acts or objects illegal. That is part of the beauty of the three part government.

[drvsafe]

Originally Posted by ShagNasty1001

Not very many people own actual assault rifles... Unless you have a rifle capable of firing more than 1 shot per trigger pull, it's not an assault rifle. The AR stands for Armalite. And they take magazines, just like every firearm that holds more than 1 round (excluding the Garand, that's the only rifle I know that takes clip)

AR are actually initials for Armalite Rifle and I would also add that have several rounds of 5.56 on stripper clips. I use them to fill magazines.

We would be blessed if they banned clips over 10 rounds. I've never personally seen a clip with more than 10rounds . You're right about the federal definition of an assault rifle but the popular definition of the day is "a scary looking rifle like I saw in those movies."

[Merkava_4]

Originally Posted by FullautoUSA

Apparently it will make it illegal to own a gun that any of these

detachable magazine that can hold more than 10 rounds
Pistol grip
Non fixed stock
Bayonet lug
Thumbhole stock
Threaded barrel

We already got those laws in California.

The Fed wants to turn you good ol' boys into San Francisco boys.

[drvsafe]

Or Jersey Strong.

No bayonet lug or adjustable stock OR removable muzzle device OR magazines over 15 rounds... in the Garden State. Sucks.

[Trez]

Originally Posted by drvsafe

AR are actually initials for Armalite Rifle and I would also add that have several rounds of 5.56 on stripper clips. I use them to fill magazines.

We would be blessed if they banned clips over 10 rounds. I've never personally seen a clip with more than 10rounds . You're right about the federal definition of an assault rifle but the popular definition of the day is "a scary looking rifle like I saw in those movies."

But there smarter than that..... I really dont hear the term "clip" in the meda anymore.. Its become "Ammunition Feeding Devices"

[vincent]

Originally Posted by SubZero

Harsh.

New York passed the 7 shot clip limit. I find that shocking. I still think a 15 shot clip for hand guns and for assault rifles would be a better compromise.

THERE WILL BE NO MORE COMPROMISES

Originally Posted by cottontop

There does not have to be a bill. Nothing has to go through congress. The president can pass and/or order a law through executive privilidge. It will happen. Get used to it.
cottontop

Sorry Cotton but that's just not true...

[Mosin]

The fact that bayonets are the ONE thing that our founding fathers had on their weapons that we have now... Speaks volumes to the idiocy and ignorance of banning them.

[TexasRog]

Screw it..if you have it.dont give nothin up. Hide it, do whatever. buy what you need to be legal. Stash what you need for survival when crap hits the fan.

[CrazedJava]

NY had a 10 round limit. Now it is 7. We've seen where they want to go with "reasonable" and "compromise"

They're not going to be happy with a 10 round limit. Just wait, someone is going to try for 5 soon. At least if this keeps up.

They'll keep bringing out the same old tropes.

"No one needs 30 rounds"
"No one needs 15 rounds"
"No one needs 10 rounds"
"No one needs 7 rounds"

They know they can't outright ban guns, so they'll just render them as useless as possible.