DHS Checkpoints - Page 2
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > DHS Checkpoints

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-02-2014, 09:29 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 3,484
Liked 1076 Times on 715 Posts
Likes Given: 707

Default

Quote:
I hit a boarder patrol check point near my house nearly every day and my wife goes through two every day that she works. She always complies since she is afraid to get beaten or killed. I will answer the question am I a citizen, but I always refuse to answer anymore questions siting my status as a citizen. I guess it helps that most days I have a tie on and am driving a car that is insured for $90,000.00 and looks it.
For Cripe's sake, you think they would know the locals, and just give them a sticker for the windshield, and a special lane to go right through.

Quote:
They have a 100 mile wide band along the borders in which the fourth amendment is suspended, giving them quite an advantage over you.
According to who? And, like Franklin said, if they REALLY had an advantage, why would they not detain or arrest you? And, like I said, what you should REALLY be concerned about is one of those guys doing something which he/she has no authority to do. If it comes down to that, which side is the govt. going to side with?
__________________

I don't see what the problem is. Everybody is being nice, and getting along, and I, for one, am learning stuff. So, if you don't like the discussion, don't look at the thread. Or, simply cut to the chase, and close it.
_________________
Is there an age limit for a thread, after which we kill it?

clr8ter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 09:43 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 3,484
Liked 1076 Times on 715 Posts
Likes Given: 707

Default

Seancslaughter, what is CBP?

__________________

I don't see what the problem is. Everybody is being nice, and getting along, and I, for one, am learning stuff. So, if you don't like the discussion, don't look at the thread. Or, simply cut to the chase, and close it.
_________________
Is there an age limit for a thread, after which we kill it?

clr8ter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 10:28 PM   #13
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 2,823
Liked 1768 Times on 989 Posts
Likes Given: 1302

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franklin1995 View Post
If it's actually on the border, then checkpoints are fine. But these are checkpoints well inside the United States. People who never travel into Mexico are stopped daily simply for traveling throughout the country.

*EDIT not to mention, the fact that they let you go if you refuse to answer their questions long enough proves that they don't really have the right to stop you. If they did, they would detain you and arrest you. Instead, people are just willing to give up information. I don't want to give off the wrong impression that I'm okay with people illegally immigrating into the US. I think we need much stricter policies and need to start kicking people out. But forcing people to stop on their way to work or on their vacation inside the US is wrong.
I understand what you are saying, but look at the reality for a minute. Illegal immigrants are most often smuggled across on foot. At some point inside our borders they will usually meet a vehicle. It's unrealistic to expect them to hike more than 100 miles and then hop a ride. Logic tells me that they will be in a motor vehicle long before then. Why not put the checkpoint where they have a better chance of catching them and whoever is doing the transporting? Setting up at the border is about as useless as a Pepto Bismol stand at a bulemics convention.
__________________
Doc3402 is offline  
Franklin1995 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 10:30 PM   #14
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Northeast San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,665
Liked 776 Times on 517 Posts
Likes Given: 49

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clr8ter View Post
Seancslaughter, what is CBP?

Customs and border patrol


Sent from my iPhone using Firearms Talk
__________________

this message was sent using my Barrett 50 straight to your brain.

seancslaughter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 10:49 PM   #15
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The Great State of Jefferson
Posts: 539
Liked 401 Times on 207 Posts
Likes Given: 799

Default

You just try to smuggle apples or lettuce into The People Republic of California and see what happens to all you vegie smugglers.
Our borders are safe from you
.
__________________

Keep your powder dry boys.
Things are gonna get rough.

widowmaker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 10:52 PM   #16
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
orangello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19,155
Liked 5734 Times on 3360 Posts
Likes Given: 4877

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc3402 View Post
I understand what you are saying, but look at the reality for a minute. Illegal immigrants are most often smuggled across on foot. At some point inside our borders they will usually meet a vehicle. It's unrealistic to expect them to hike more than 100 miles and then hop a ride. Logic tells me that they will be in a motor vehicle long before then. Why not put the checkpoint where they have a better chance of catching them and whoever is doing the transporting? Setting up at the border is about as useless as a Pepto Bismol stand at a bulemics convention.
I thought Odumbo had put a stop to the legal export of his potential voters?
__________________

Dead Bears, the only good kind.

orangello is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 11:06 PM   #17
JTJ
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lake Havasu,Arizona
Posts: 6,444
Liked 2269 Times on 1234 Posts
Likes Given: 668

Default

It is called training. They are training citizens to quietly submit to police authority. The TSA is doing the same thing.

__________________

Patron Member NRA
"I would not be an old man if I had not been an armed young man." JTJ
I was taught to respect my elders but they are getting harder to find.

JTJ is offline  
5
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 11:13 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
WonderingMind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 291
Liked 314 Times on 141 Posts
Likes Given: 65

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clr8ter View Post
For Cripe's sake, you think they would know the locals, and just give them a sticker for the windshield, and a special lane to go right through.
I rarely see the same guys more then once, when I do see someone I recognize they usually either wave me though or want to chat for a few seconds if there is no traffic behind me. In that case it is usually something like, nice car or how you doing today..

If they had a sticker or bypass program I don't know if I would bother since there is no way in heck it would be free and frankly I give the Gooberment Thugs too much of my money anyhow. Though I have had some negative comments on my license plate number from the anti gun BP types.


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert A Heinlein
Criminals are never materially handicapped by such rules; the only effect is to disarm the peaceful citizen and put him fully at the mercy of the lawless. Such rules look very pretty on paper; in practice they are as foolish and footless as the attempt of the mice to bell the cat.

Letter to Alice Dalgliesh, the editor who was censoring his manuscript for Red Planet, regarding gun control registration and control Published in 1949
WonderingMind is offline  
4
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 11:16 PM   #19
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Franklin1995's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 523
Liked 446 Times on 246 Posts
Likes Given: 897

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc3402 View Post
I understand what you are saying, but look at the reality for a minute. Illegal immigrants are most often smuggled across on foot. At some point inside our borders they will usually meet a vehicle. It's unrealistic to expect them to hike more than 100 miles and then hop a ride. Logic tells me that they will be in a motor vehicle long before then. Why not put the checkpoint where they have a better chance of catching them and whoever is doing the transporting? Setting up at the border is about as useless as a Pepto Bismol stand at a bulemics convention.
Because if they're allowed to set up a checkpoint 30 miles away, they're going to try to set one up 60 miles away and use the excuse "we're already doing this" Then it's 90 miles away, then 120, then before you know it they're going to be everywhere. I just don't like seeing the government get a foothold into invading our rights. Governments and politicians are inherently greedy, they always want more and more power. And they realize that the only way to get more power is to do it slowly. I hate to pull out the "Hitler" thing, but he didn't wake up one morning and immediately start murdering people. He introduced different policies gradually, and then once he had complete control he started to kill.

Another thing that we should ask is how effective are these checkpoints? I honestly don't know the answer to that. And setting up at the border isn't quite as useless as that pepto bismol stand
__________________
Franklin1995 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 11:48 PM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 45
Default

The simple fact is, we don't have to protect our borders to stop 99.9% of illegal immigrants. What we have to do is make it illegal for them to work here, and place massive fines, and possible jail tyime, on any business that knowing hires illegal immigrants. As long as they can work here, there's no way in hell we can stop them from coming in. The moment they can't work here, they'll stop coming in, and those already here will have to go home.

As for checkpoints, I don't respect authority just because it's authority. The moment authority steps over the line and violates the Constitution and my rights, it's tyranny, and I'm going to give that authority as difficult a time as possible, while still doing my best to stay out of jail.

__________________
Jamesaritchie is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
DHS Checkpoints Rocky7 Politics, Religion and Controversy 49 11-16-2013 01:51 AM
Checkpoints aimed at stopping terrorist threat Bigcountry02 Politics, Religion and Controversy 5 10-30-2009 05:37 AM