Canadian Gun Rights Activist May Lose Home to Gov't
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Canadian Gun Rights Activist May Lose Home to Gov't

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-15-2011, 01:59 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sushihunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver Island,BC
Posts: 44
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Exclamation Canadian Gun Rights Activist May Lose Home to Gov't

Canadian Gun Rights Activist May Lose Home to Gov't

Please watch this video by Katey Montague, daughter of Gun Rights Activist Bruce Montague.

After losing in court, and spending time in jail for opposing Canada's oppressive C-68 gun laws and Long Gun Registry, the government of Ontario is seeking to take the family home as "criminal proceeds".


This family has fought for us - now we need to fight for them.
__________________

Last edited by Sushihunter; 02-16-2011 at 12:44 AM. Reason: typo correction
Sushihunter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-15-2011, 02:55 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
M14sRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,540
Liked 33 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 47

Default

Wow. That is too much power for a gov't to wield.

__________________
NRA-Life
CRPA-Life

SAF-Life
PEIAPOI


"Obama has ordered the launching of more Tomahawk cruise missiles than All the other Nobel Peace Prize winners combined."
M14sRock is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 03:11 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fixxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hutchinson,Kansas
Posts: 188
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Good luck brother. You are at a clear disadvantage by having to fight an uphill battle with the government already having taken many of your firearms rights. I beleive our neighbors to the North can band together and convince their government that common sense and decency will prevail over the ill-intentioned ways of the few. I believe you can convince them that not everyone should pay for ill intentioned minority's mistakes and furthermore, the good intentioned majority should have the right to protect themselves from ill will with the necessary tools.

__________________

Give a man a match and he'll be warm for a few seconds. Light him on FIRE and he'll be warm for the rest of his life!

fixxer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 03:25 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
gregs887's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Moorpark,CA
Posts: 1,547
Liked 39 Times on 29 Posts
Likes Given: 137

Default

You can lose your home for merely opposing a government point of view? That is some scary stuff.

__________________

Greg

“The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget.”

"Never underestimate the predictability of stupid"

gregs887 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 03:30 AM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
RJMercer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 516
Liked 402 Times on 209 Posts
Likes Given: 602

Default

"We're with the government, and we're here to help" comes to mind.......

__________________
RJMercer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 12:19 PM   #6
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

That's a beautiful home and a lousy video. The cause may be a great one that I'd be willing to donate to, but Katey didn't bother telling us WHY the government is trying to take her family's home.

In what way was the gun law opposed? What's the whole picture?

__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 08:20 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Apple Valley,CA
Posts: 13
Default

That's sad to hear their government is trying to take their house...I'm still confused how they pissed the government off though.

__________________
darkbarrel is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2011, 11:41 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Murfdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Pearland,Texas
Posts: 100
Likes Given: 7

Default

[QUOTE=bkt;445848]That's a beautiful home and a lousy video. The cause may be a great one that I'd be willing to donate to, but Katey didn't bother telling us WHY the government is trying to take her family's home.

In what way was the gun law opposed? What's the whole picture?[/QUOTE


+1 That sounds scarey.But why?


Murfdog

__________________

Life Liberty & the Pursuit of H&Ks
P2000sk 9mm NS Lem
P2000sk .40 sw NS Lem
USPc .45acp NS Lem

Murfdog is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2011, 12:21 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sushihunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver Island,BC
Posts: 44
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Exclamation

Thanks for your interest in this case.

For more info about Bruce Montague, please visit his website: BruceMontague.ca - About - Of Freedom and Tyranny

From the website:

Bruce Montague determined to expose the constitutional violations in the Canadian Firearms Act. After being charged, mounting a constiutional challenge and appealing to the Supreme Court of Canada, Montague's case was dismissed without reasons. The Montagues then face an unexpected twist -- the confiscation of their home and property by the Ontario government.

Though the case has shifted focus as the crown pursues the next step in its confiscation agenda, the Montagues deserve our continued support as they fight to keep their home and property.

YOU COULD BE NEXT! Canada is undergoing a quiet revolution and your fundamental rights and freedoms are at stake! View Original Index Page »


On another site:

Bruce Montague Case Sentencing Update

Bruce Montague Case Sentencing Update
By Christopher di Armani


Kenora, ON

Bruce Montague's sentencing hearing on 26 firearms-related charges completed March 18, 2006 with Justice John Wright sentencing Bruce Montague to 18 months in jail. Bruce's wife Donna Montague was found innocent of careless storage, and was given six months probation for owning firearms without a license.

Lawyer Douglas Christie argued that Montague should be sentenced similar to Ryerson Knight, the Victoria gun collector who pled guilty to 19 firearms charges after a search of his home yielded 662 firearms. The majority of Knight's firearms were pre-1950 military arms, and included handguns, fully-automatic firearms, tear-gas grenades, and silencers. Knight received a conditional sentence of two years less a day, of which the first nine months is being served under house arrest.

The foreman of the jury that convicted Mr. Montague wanted to address the court to offer the jury's recommendation that Montague serve no jail time. Justice Wright denied him, saying his wishes were irrelevant. The jury's job is to convict or acquit, the judge's job is to impose sentence, he said.

When given the opportunity to address the court, Bruce Montague said he would accept whatever sentence the judge deemed appropriate.

You've taken everything we have, Donna Montague said. You've stolen money from us that nobody will even investigate, you've taken our life savings in the form of our gun collection, you've taken my husband and my children's father, and you've taken our family home. You have utterly destroyed a family for absolutely no good reason. It's disgusting. My forefathers fought for this country through three wars, and now you are destroying the antique firearms they used to defend Canada in the War of 1812 and the Fenian Raids. Our forefathers must be rolling over in their graves. They never fought for this kind of Canada!

After sentence was handed down, Bruce was immediately taken into custody and transferred to the Kenora Remand Centre. Katey Montague simply stood still, tears in her eyes as she watched her father taken away by two police officers.

Writer and freedom fighter Pierre Lemieux, already embroiled in his own challenge of the Firearms Act (see sidebar Pierre Lemieux) traveled from his home in Lac-Saguay, Quebec to Dryden, Ontario to research the history of Bruce's legal battle and interview the family on video.

After the sentencing hearing Donna and Katey Montague were driven home by a family friend, and Donna noted that "[Sergeant] Meeks (the arresting officer in the case) followed us all the way. We even pulled to the right hand in the passing zones and slowed below 80km/hr. He didn't pass until we got to Eaton Rugby Rd."

Meeks was, no doubt, just making sure they returned home safely, and did not mean to cause any further alarm.

Charges under the Firearms Act can be dealt with in two ways: summary conviction or indictable offence. The difference is the penalties and how those penalties are applied. See sidebar "Types of Offences". Bruce's sentence runs concurrently, and sentences for each conviction are noted in the sidebar "Sentencing In Brief".

In an interview Donna Montague said "I just phoned the jail to see if and when we can visit Bruce. I was told that he is still in segregation. The guard told me that Bruce really doesn't belong there and that they have him in segregation for his own protection. I'm to phone tomorrow at lunch to see what his visiting hours are."

Currently Montague is being held in a segregation cell and is not allowed shoes, reading material of any kind, not even a pen and paper. He is, so far, being refused access to the telephone because he refuses to give a blood sample.

Of the sentence and the justice system, Bill Cunningham wrote online, "We don't have a Justice system in Canada, we have a revolving door Legal Industry that keeps putting REAL criminals back on the street where they can keep the wheels of this legal industry moving, and it just makes me sick!!!"

Both the pre-sentencing report created by Bert Sombrutsku and Justice Wright's sentencing report made a point of chastising Mr. Montague for "using" his daughter to promote his ideas in the series of YouTube videos entitled Katey's Firearms Facts.

The pre-sentence report says: "To publicly assert his ideas via the internet, using his daughter, may be considered as being exploitative..." In his sentencing report Justice Wright stated: "He has also exercised poor taste in involving his young daughter in his campaign for the right to bear arms."

It is clear that neither man questioned Bruce about Katey's videos. It is equally clear they never bothered to ask Katey either, as she would have assuredly set them straight. Katey wanted to help her father. She did that the only way she knew how, by using the tools and technology of her generation to promote awareness of her father's case.

“There is no legal justification for disobeying the law,” Wright said in his written report. He suggested that Montague and others failed to try alternatives to breaking the law to oppose the Firearms Act. Justice Wright appears to be unaware of the history of the Canadian Unregistered Firearms Owners Association and their varied and repeated efforts to get their concerns addressed.

Multiple requests were delivered to both provincial and federal governments asking them to refer Criminal Code Chapter 39, the Firearms Act, to the Supreme Court as a civil rights abuse case. The few Attorney Generals to respond suggested that since civil rights are individual rights, provincial governments would not interfere between the state and the individual.

Former Saskatchewan Minister of Justice Frank Quennell wrote to Joe Gingrich, a CUFOA member, "[t]he rights guaranteed by the Charter are individual in nature, and their application will depend heavily on the facts of a particular case. The Government's position is that Charter-based challenges are best brought by individuals, who can assert their own rights, rather than by the Government."

With that notion in mind, the Montague family, Bruce's case management team and lawyer Douglas Christie will continue the appeals process. It is a long legal road ahead, and it will be costly. To all those who have helped financially so far, the Montague family is eternally grateful.

If you would like to help Donna and Katey Montague, the Dryden IGA store will accept credit card purchases of gift certificates for the Montague family. Please call 807-221-2400 if you would like to help the family in this way. The store will call the family to let them know your gift certificate is waiting for them.




If you would like to make a donation to help the Montague's continue the legal battle for all our rights to the Supreme Court, you can donate through the website at BruceMontague.ca - About - Of Freedom and Tyranny , or by mailing donations directly to "Bruce Montague Scrap C-68 Fund" c/o Roger Nordlund, Trustee, RR#2, Site 211, Box 7, Dryden, Ontario, P8N 2Y5.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sidebar: Pierre Lemieux

Pierre's battle with the state goes back to 1996, when Pierre applied for the new FAC, and then 2001, when he applied for a firearms license under the new Firearms Act. In these two applications, he refused to answer questions he deemed none of the state's business, such as questions about his love life. In both cases, the application was granted.

His 2001 firearms license has now expired, despite Pierre's attempt to renew it. On the renewal form, he again refused to answer intrusive questions, but this time the state disallowed his application, instead sending him a notice of refusal and revoking all his firearm registration certificates. Pierre's battle continues and he is now appealing the refusal and challenging the constitutionality of the “law”.

For more information on Pierre's battle, please visit his information page on this issue at Centre des armes à feu Canada: Nous sommes Police Canada | Canada FirearmsCentre:We are Police Canada, and also his website Canada Travel Blog, with ongoing news, columns, videos and discussions of liberty.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Summary, Indictable and Hybrid Offences

Summary conviction offences cover the most minor offences in the Criminal Code. Unless specified otherwise, a summary conviction offence carries a maximum fine of $2,000, six months in jail or both.

An indictable offence is more serious than a summary conviction offence, and usually carries greater penalties. Many indictable offences, including those in the Firearms Act, have minimum mandatory sentences. If prosecuted by indictment you are generally entitled to trial by jury.

Hybrid offences

Many violations of the Firearms Act are "hybrid offences". They can be prosecuted either by summary conviction or indictment. The Crown "elects" the mode of prosecution. Hybrid offences are considered indictable until the Crown makes its election.

In the Montague case, the Crown chose to proceed by indictment for all charges.

Concurrent sentencing means all sentences are served at the same time. If he had been given consecutive sentences, then each sentence would have to be served individually, one after another.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sentencing In Brief

As written in the unofficial Sentencing Report available at BruceMontague.ca - About - Of Freedom and Tyranny, Bruce Montague was sentenced as follows:

For six counts of “storing the two non-restricted firearms in a not unloaded condition” - one year probation

For possession of firearms without a license and his “Deliberate defiance of the law in this respect” - six months imprisonment

For one count of possession of a silenced .22 caliber pistol – 12 months;

For one count of “possession of a prohibited device” – 90 day sentence to be served in the community;

For three counts of “possession of oversize magazines” – 90 day sentence to be served in the community;

For nine counts of “possession of loaded prohibited or restricted firearms or prohibited firearms with ammunition readily accessible” – 12 months;

For three counts of “altering a firearm to fire automatically” - 18 months.

For four counts of “the deliberate defacing or removal of a serial number” – 12 months;

All sentences are to run concurrent, and all probation or suspended sentences commence at the completion of incarceration.

Bruce Montague also has a lifetime firearms prohibition against him.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher di Armani is a freelance writer and filmmaker who resides in Lytton, BC, Canada, with his wife Lynda and their two dogs, Koda and Tuco.
Christopher can be contacted at christopher(at)diArmani.com or diArmani.com: Our Poison-Tipped Pens are Sharper Than the Mightiest of Swords.

--30--



Copyright 2008 diArmani.com

__________________
Sushihunter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2011, 12:28 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sushihunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Vancouver Island,BC
Posts: 44
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Exclamation Bruce Montague released

Some additional info:

Bruce Montague released | The Dryden Observer

Bruce Montague released
Posted on 18 January 2011
Tags: bruce montague, dryden gunsmith
This post was written by Ally Dunham

Dryden area gunsmith Bruce Montague was released on parole from a Thunder Bay prison, Jan. 11, following a four-month stay.

Over six years since his arrest at a Dryden gun show, a costly court challenge of the Canadian Firearms Act and failed appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, Montague says he’s done fighting.

“We’re done like dinner,” he said. “We’ve gone as far as the Supreme Court and they turned us down. I’m pretty disappointed in our justice system in many ways. The courts on every level have totally ignored our arguments and just found me guilty. I’m finished fighting. If they turned around and legalized human sacrifice today, I would not protest it, guaranteed. It’s a lost cause.”

His legal troubles aren’t yet over, however. In May, Montague faces a hearing in regards to the civil forfeiture of his Eton-Rugby home and other assets through the Proceeds of Crime Bill.

Montague is somewhat fatalistic about the upcoming hearing, saying he’s been trying to put it out of his mind.

“I’m numb,” he said. “At this point I’m done fighting them. If they want to take the house they’ll take it, if they don’t they’ll let me have it. From what I’ve seen over the last six years of fighting, you can have all the legal documents you want in order and the judge can just ignore it. So what’s the point of putting in all the effort? I’m not going to worry about it. I’m going to show up in court and see what happens.”

At home, Montague is bound by numerous restrictions. He must abide by a curfew that confines him to his residence from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. He is also restricted from leaving the province and faces a lifetime firearms ban. His parole will extend approximately one year, after that another year of probation will follow, as will 90 days of community service.

Montague says his experience in prison was a difficult one.

“It’s a very dehumanizing experience,” he said. “I must admit I used to talk up a big storm, saying, ‘everything’s taken care of — all your meals, satellite TV — sounds great!’. Try it on for size, it’s no picnic. It plays quite a head game with you. You’re considered to be total filth and garbage and you’re reminded of it every single day you’re in there.”

__________________
Sushihunter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Federal Gov't Pistol Qualification Rentacop Training & Safety 52 02-21-2014 01:58 AM
State Rights vs. Federal Rights, opaww Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 07-31-2009 09:47 PM
Mayor tries to silence activist Musket Politics, Religion and Controversy 2 01-11-2009 10:27 PM
McCain is Going to Lose and Lose Big BigO01 Politics, Religion and Controversy 25 09-29-2008 03:00 PM