Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Ca 2A advocates deliver 67,000 letters to Gov.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2013, 10:08 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
peopleofthesun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California
Posts: 74
Liked 27 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 39

Default

Thank you all who send letters in and donated! We did lose some and beat the worse ones. AB 48 only targets magazine "conversion kits". It does not ban pre-ban magazines. That part was amended out with bill 396 not making the cut.

Once again thank you all who supported us.

-Cisco

__________________
peopleofthesun is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2013, 10:17 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,250
Liked 390 Times on 253 Posts
Likes Given: 1388

Default

Keep up the good work!
Be an activist and an organizer!

__________________
https://www.numbersusa.com/content/

Primary Rifle:
LWRC M6A2 w/ Eotech512

Primary Handgun:
Ruger GP100 Royal Phoenix
bluez is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2013, 11:51 PM   #13
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
myers1991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 65
Liked 32 Times on 20 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peopleofthesun
The Firearms Policy Coalition delivers 67,000 letters to Gov. Brown's office asking him to veto all gun control bills. These were the letters generated by the WWW.DemandRights.com site. They will keep printing, faxing and emailing Gov. Brown so share the link. http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2013/10/advocates-urge-gov-jerry-brown-to-veto-gun-bills.html "With Gov. Jerry Brown days away from deciding the fate of a stack of gun bills, Second Amendment advocates today delivered to the governor's office about 67,000 signed letters imploring him to veto the 14 prospective laws. "California already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation and these 14 measures are particularly onerous," said Craig DeLuz, a legislative advocate for the California Association of Federal Firearms Licensees...."
I believe a good question to be asking, with rhetoric of course, is how many of these 67,000 people are legal gun owners or supporters and not gang members or anyone that illegally obtains guns? I believe the answer would be 0, zilch!!! If only the stupid libertard legislators and officials could see this we would not be in this debate at all.
__________________
myers1991 is offline  
peopleofthesun Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2013, 12:11 AM   #14
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
myers1991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 65
Liked 32 Times on 20 Posts

Default

Gang members and anyone who illegally obtains guns would be zero of course. Sorry for the confusion.

__________________
myers1991 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2013, 04:46 AM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mrm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,373
Liked 302 Times on 201 Posts
Likes Given: 26

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peopleofthesun View Post
Thank you all who send letters in and donated! We did lose some and beat the worse ones. AB 48 only targets magazine "conversion kits". It does not ban pre-ban magazines. That part was amended out with bill 396 not making the cut.

Once again thank you all who supported us.

-Cisco
I thought it did ban pre ban magazines or null the grandfather clause.

This is what I read for AB 48

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB48
__________________
A good piece of glass is like a fine piece of ass. There is no known substitute known to man, and neither are cheap.

Last edited by mrm14; 10-13-2013 at 04:49 AM.
mrm14 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2013, 05:21 AM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
peopleofthesun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California
Posts: 74
Liked 27 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 39

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm14 View Post
I thought it did ban pre ban magazines or null the grandfather clause.

This is what I read for AB 48

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB48
Only if SB 396 became law which it didn't. It didn't even make it to the Gov desk. Here:

SEC. 3.
Section 1.5 of this bill incorporates amendments to Section 32310 of the Penal Code proposed by both this bill and Senate Bill 396. It shall only become operative if (1) both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2014, (2) each bill amends Section 32310 of the Penal Code, and (3) this bill is enacted after Senate Bill 396, in which case Section 1 of this bill shall not become operative.

SECTION 1.
Section 32310 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

32310.
(a) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, commencing January 1, 2000, any person in this state who manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.
(b) For purposes of this section, “manufacturing” includes both fabricating a magazine and assembling a magazine from a combination of parts, including, but not limited to, the body, spring, follower, and floor plate or end plate, to be a fully functioning large-capacity magazine.

SEC. 1.5.
Section 32310 of the Penal Code is amended to read:

32310.
(a) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, any person in this state who manufactures or causes to be manufactured, imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives, lends, buys, or receives any large-capacity magazine is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170.

(b) Except as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 32400) of this chapter and in Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 17700) of Division 2 of Title 2, commencing July 1, 2014, any person in this state who possesses any large-capacity magazine, regardless of the date the magazine was acquired, is guilty of an infraction punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100), or is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars ($100), by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment.


Wall of text I know but it is in there.
__________________
peopleofthesun is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Winchester to Deliver 200 Million 40-Cal. Rounds to Homeland Security Bigcountry02 Legal and Activism 7 09-05-2010 12:55 AM
Advocates of Anti-Shariah Measures Alarmed by Judge's Ruling opaww Politics, Religion and Controversy 15 08-09-2010 07:36 PM
Nominee advocates global gun control--UN Musket Politics, Religion and Controversy 12 05-05-2009 09:48 PM
Radical advocates of violence opaww Politics, Religion and Controversy 4 01-16-2009 08:50 AM