Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Best Petition ever

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2012, 05:22 AM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Jpyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,815
Liked 762 Times on 441 Posts
Likes Given: 457

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic82 View Post
I'll sign it, but it will be ignored. The big hole in the 2nd ammendment (correct me here if I'm wrong) is what are considered arms? The 2nd doesn't define this? To the anti's.... a single shot blackpowder pistol fills the bill.
Arms in 18th century language was generally meant to describe a weapon, especially a weapon of war. The 2A's intent was to protect the human right of self defense by guaranteeing every citizen the unfettered right to remain ready and able to engage in battle, against the government if necessary, i.e.,"the right to keep and bear arms."

Present arms, call to arms, etc are reflective of that usage. Generally speaking arms is understood today to mean small arms such as handguns and rifles that can be carried into battle although use of the term "Arms Race" to describe nuclear proliferation certainly lends itself to a broader meaning. Fortunately for us all the Constitution does not limit the 2A to a right to keep and bear single shot musket.
__________________

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

Jpyle is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2012, 01:15 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sonic82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
Posts: 2,901
Liked 749 Times on 477 Posts
Likes Given: 586

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpyle View Post
Arms in 18th century language was generally meant to describe a weapon, especially a weapon of war. The 2A's intent was to protect the human right of self defense by guaranteeing every citizen the unfettered right to remain ready and able to engage in battle, against the government if necessary, i.e.,"the right to keep and bear arms."

Present arms, call to arms, etc are reflective of that usage. Generally speaking arms is understood today to mean small arms such as handguns and rifles that can be carried into battle although use of the term "Arms Race" to describe nuclear proliferation certainly lends itself to a broader meaning. Fortunately for us all the Constitution does not limit the 2A to a right to keep and bear single shot musket.
I'll buy that...but those opposed won't. They have a different interpretation.
__________________
“He who stands for nothing will fall for anything.”
― Alexander Hamilton

The comments made herein are those solely of this writer and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person, agency, or entity.
Sonic82 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
awb petition Ultimate_sig Legal and Activism 183 12-27-2012 09:41 PM
Tango for Mod Petition Benning Boy The Club House 15 10-08-2009 03:07 PM
Petition layton Politics, Religion and Controversy 2 07-30-2009 01:32 AM