Assault Weapons Ban Upheld in D.C.
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > Assault Weapons Ban Upheld in D.C.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-10-2011, 05:10 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JoinOrDieSaidBenFranklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Summerville,SC
Posts: 237
Default Assault Weapons Ban Upheld in D.C.

Here is from the NY Times Editorial page. Comment urged...


The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last week persuasively ruled that the Constitution allows the District to ban possession of assault weapons and high-capacity magazines of bullets and to require citizens to meet sensible standards for registering guns.


This ruling underscores a principle set forth in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, which held that the Second Amendment allows individuals to keep handguns at home for self-defense. The Supreme Court said in that case that the right is “not unlimited” and doesn’t protect guns “not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes.” And it specifically suggested that jurisdictions could ban the possession of the military’s M-16 rifle because it is “dangerous and unusual.”

The District’s firearms law defines “assault weapon” to include rifles like the AR-15, which the Supreme Court once called “the civilian version of the military’s M-16 rifle.” The appeals court suggested that the only place where assault weapons, which are designed to spray bullets at a rapid rate, are necessary for self-defense is on a battlefield or the equivalent for police. Anywhere else their presence is an invitation to mayhem and puts police officers and all around at high risk.

It also concluded that “the evidence demonstrates a ban on assault weapons is likely to promote the Government’s interest in crime control in the densely populated urban area that is the District of Columbia.” The court reached the same conclusion about banning magazines with more than 10 rounds of ammunition. Those magazines increase the dangers of semiautomatic guns: they result in more shots fired, people wounded and wounds per person. The appeals court’s ruling is careful and convincing on this heated topic.

__________________
The Federal government sucks, Obama sucks, liberals suck, and so on. That's why we're here, right boys! Ok! p.s. I like guns.
JoinOrDieSaidBenFranklin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 10-10-2011, 05:25 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BenLuby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 2,181
Liked 77 Times on 44 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

Ah. Another 'cosmetic ban'. Just because it looks like an 'assault weapon' doesn't make it one.
That's like putting a Lamborghini body on a Yugo. It's still a Yugo. These judges are either legally stupid or pushing their agenda and hoping the rest of the country is just that stupid.
(I'm not going to get into the magazine issue.)

__________________
BenLuby is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 05:27 PM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,565
Liked 2237 Times on 1218 Posts
Likes Given: 3463

Default

i'm not surprised that anti-gun federal judges voted against the Second Amendment. The SCOTUS decision was not a ringing endorsement of our Second Amendment rights either. That decision laid the ground work for a wide intrepretation by the federal appeals courts. Those varying decisions by the appeals courts will have to be worked out by SCOTUS.

__________________
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 05:31 PM   #4
fmj
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fmj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Wayne,IN
Posts: 3,454
Liked 753 Times on 437 Posts
Likes Given: 306

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alsaqr View Post
i'm not surprised that anti-gun federal judges voted against the Second Amendment. The SCOTUS decision was not a ringing endorsement of our Second Amendment rights either. That decision laid the ground work for a wide intrepretation by the federal appeals courts. Those varying decisions by the appeals courts will have to be worked out by SCOTUS.
and now that the SCOTUS is tipped the other way (liberal, anti gun zealots pushing their agenda)....
__________________
"Those that would trade essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security." - Benjammin Franklin

The 1911: Turning useless trash into good fertilizer for over 100 years!!
fmj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 05:34 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BenLuby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 2,181
Liked 77 Times on 44 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fmj View Post
and now that the SCOTUS is tipped the other way (liberal, anti gun zealots pushing their agenda)....
it's not tipped yet. The Obamanites haven't yet managed to take control of all of it.
__________________
BenLuby is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 06:24 PM   #6
fmj
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fmj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Wayne,IN
Posts: 3,454
Liked 753 Times on 437 Posts
Likes Given: 306

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLuby View Post
it's not tipped yet. The Obamanites haven't yet managed to take control of all of it.
it was a fine balance to begin with, all it took was the two he appointed to flip it IMHO.

Chief Roberts, Scalia and Alito are the only really truly solid friends we have...Kennedy and Thomas are crap shoots which way they will swing half the time and we KNOW where Sotomayor and Kegan are firmly rooted
__________________
"Those that would trade essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security." - Benjammin Franklin

The 1911: Turning useless trash into good fertilizer for over 100 years!!
fmj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 06:26 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BenLuby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Douglasville,Georgia
Posts: 2,181
Liked 77 Times on 44 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

Kennedy and Thomas, when you analyze the majority of their votes, try very hard to follow the constitution, regardless of what and who appointed them.
If we're lucky the retard will be out shortly. (If the right can find a sane candidate).

__________________
BenLuby is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 06:36 PM   #8
fmj
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fmj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Wayne,IN
Posts: 3,454
Liked 753 Times on 437 Posts
Likes Given: 306

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLuby View Post
Kennedy and Thomas, when you analyze the majority of their votes, try very hard to follow the constitution, regardless of what and who appointed them.
If we're lucky the retard will be out shortly. (If the right can find a sane candidate).
As much as i try to look at it as the beer bottle being half full, i dont hold out much hope. I doubt the GOP, Libertarian, or Tea Party will find anything worth voting for so i will end up voting AGAINST the idiot.

And i really fear the idiot is gonna get a second term...there are just too many stupid people in this country that simply DO NOT get it!
__________________
"Those that would trade essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security." - Benjammin Franklin

The 1911: Turning useless trash into good fertilizer for over 100 years!!
fmj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 07:19 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,565
Liked 2237 Times on 1218 Posts
Likes Given: 3463

Default

Yep, Carter was a failure as president. However, Carter did not bring you any new gun control laws or ban any guns from import.

__________________
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 08:06 PM   #10
fmj
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fmj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fort Wayne,IN
Posts: 3,454
Liked 753 Times on 437 Posts
Likes Given: 306

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alsaqr View Post
Yep, Carter was a failure as president. However, Carter did not bring you any new gun control laws or ban any guns from import.
Did you mean to put this comment here ...

http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f97/open-carry-prohibited-california-49591/

it would seem to fit better.
__________________
"Those that would trade essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security." - Benjammin Franklin

The 1911: Turning useless trash into good fertilizer for over 100 years!!
fmj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
No Assault Weapons Ban anytime soon. Last Crow Politics, Religion and Controversy 1 10-18-2009 07:24 PM
Assault weapons and gun conrtol Livefreedom Politics, Religion and Controversy 16 06-12-2009 01:36 PM
Assault Weapons at Sportsman's Warehouse Bigcountry02 Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion 7 05-16-2009 02:12 PM
Reactivation of the '95 Assault Weapons Ban dglockster Legal and Activism 12 02-02-2008 08:45 PM
Federal Assault Weapons Ban notdku Legal and Activism 13 07-08-2007 06:10 AM