The “Assault Weapon” Rebellion
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism > The “Assault Weapon” Rebellion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2014, 05:35 PM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Overkill0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,676
Liked 3218 Times on 1616 Posts
Likes Given: 421

Default The “Assault Weapon” Rebellion

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/townhallmagazine/2014/04/12/the-assault-weapon-rebellion-n1822409

Quote:
In the April issue of Townhall Magazine, Bearing Arms editor Bob Owens asks what would happen if a liberal government passed a new gun law but nobody obeyed it?
Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) signed what the Hartford Courant called “the toughest assault weapons legislation in the nation” last year. It required owners of semi-automatic firearms to register all firearms designated as “assault weapons” with the state government, along with any “high capacity” magazines they may own, by December 31, 2013.

The Malloy regime expected Connecticut residents to register somewhere between 372,000-400,000 firearms, and roughly 2 million firearm magazines that held more than 10 rounds before January 1.

What they got instead was defiance.

Just 50,000 of the estimated 372,000 so-called “assault weapons” in the state were registered by the deadline, or less than 15 percent. That’s still far better than the anemic 38,000 “high capacity” magazines that were reported to authorities, out of 2 million.

Why is compliance so low? We can’t know for sure. After all, the owners of these firearms and magazines refused to register, so we can’t easily interview them.


it continues...
I don't believe that I'm alone in the opinion that things are getting interesting. Liberal government is starting to get push back.

Of course that also reminds me of the old curse: "May you live in interesting times."
__________________
Cheers,
Greg
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see. - Ayn Rand
Overkill0084 is offline  
10
People Like This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 04-12-2014, 06:39 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lima,Ohio
Posts: 3,238
Liked 2979 Times on 1345 Posts
Likes Given: 2809

Default

A big thumbs down to the cowards that registered. Two big thumbs up for the brave who resisted tyranny.

__________________
rjd3282 is offline  
20
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 06:46 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 4,000
Liked 1320 Times on 881 Posts
Likes Given: 851

Default

Good for Conneticut!

And I continue to wonder; where did they get the figures for the magazines? Anyone can just walk into a store and pick one up. Anybody in Conn could come here and buy them...And just how did the morons expect to enforce something that is that vague?

If I owned a gun store, I would consider selling any hi-cap mags to conn residents at cost or below, if I could afford it.

__________________

I don't see what the problem is. Everybody is being nice, and getting along, and I, for one, am learning stuff. So, if you don't like the discussion, don't look at the thread. Or, simply cut to the chase, and close it.
_________________
Is there an age limit for a thread, after which we kill it?

clr8ter is offline  
3
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 07:00 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JW357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,716
Liked 3728 Times on 2285 Posts
Likes Given: 1224

Default

50k registered is still too many, in my less than humble opinion.

__________________

Always have clean socks.

JW357 is offline  
11
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:14 PM   #5
Welcoming Committee/ Resident Pellet Gunner
FTF_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
FullautoUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Marxachusetts
Posts: 2,627
Liked 625 Times on 476 Posts
Likes Given: 1111

Default

And now it begins!


RESIDENT PELLET GUN GUY

__________________
LIVE FREE OR DIE

[COLOR="Blue"]See my pellet guns here: http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/groups/ftf%20pellet%20gunners/air%20gun%20picture%20thread-149/

RESIDENT AIR GUN GUY
FullautoUSA is offline  
DFlynt Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:24 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,781
Liked 2386 Times on 1306 Posts
Likes Given: 3786

Default

The population of CT in 2010 was about 3,600,000. From 1998 to 2012 about 58 percent of CT residents bought guns: That figure comes to about 2,000,000 people buying guns in a 15 year period.

http://www.businessinsider.com/number-of-guns-sold-in-us-each-year-2012-12

CT had defacto "assault weapons" registration for many years prior to the massacre of those teachers and kids by Adam Lanza and the draconian gun laws that followed. Furthermore, every gun sold in CT for many years has been "registered" with the state police at time of purchase. The gun dealer makes four copys of the DPS-3-C form. The dealer retains a copy, the buyer gets a copy, the local sheriff or chief of police gets a copy, and a copy is furnished to the firearms branch of the CT state police.

Quote:
With minor exceptions (not included here), it is illegal, under Connecticut law, to possess assault weapons unless the owner possessed it before October 1, 1993 and obtained a DPS certificate of possession within the deadlines specified in law (CGS §§ 53-202d(a) and 53-202m).

Although the statute requiring the certificate does not use the term “registration,” the features of the law are comparable to the machine gun registration statutes. The certificate of possession must contain a description of the firearm that identifies it uniquely, including all identification marks. It must also include the owner's full name, address, date of birth, thumbprint, and any other information DPS deems appropriate (CGS § 53-202d).
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/rpt/2011-R-0074.htm

Maybe the anti-gun politicians in CT don't care if folks "register" their "assault weapons" since they are already "registered".
__________________

Last edited by alsaqr; 04-12-2014 at 09:36 PM.
alsaqr is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:26 PM   #7
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 0
Liked 22190 Times on 12450 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

a simple no, i will not comply speaks volumes of it's own.

__________________
Axxe55 is offline  
8
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 10:06 PM   #8
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Dearhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Charleston, SC,South Carolina
Posts: 1,451
Liked 1137 Times on 551 Posts
Likes Given: 177

Default

Bad boy, bad boy, what ya gonna do when they come for you!! bad, boy, bad boy

__________________

US Naval Aviation AMSC 20 years ( retired) ASW/Aircrew Wings, P2V plane capt.
US Naval Academy (DI) Shooting Instructor (Annapolis) NDW shooting team member and a lot more stuff!
Alway keep your six covered

Dearhunter is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 10:26 PM   #9
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 5,745
Liked 3079 Times on 1499 Posts
Likes Given: 1546

Default

Good for those who did not register them. The Constitution gives us the right to rebel against Tyranny! And what they attempted to do is a violation of the Constitution. So I am disappointed with those who registered their weapons. The day may come when they regret their cowering down to the liberal progressive socialist morons in office! If I recall in History Hitler did the same thing with getting the people to register their weapons. I think like the Ranchers in Nevada, people are getting tired of it finally!!!!!

03

__________________

The Constitution is not an instrument for the Government to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the Government!
*Patrick Henry

Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

-- John F. Kennedy

Sniper03 is offline  
5
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:07 AM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 3,301
Liked 2159 Times on 1280 Posts
Likes Given: 1080

Default

You have to stop talking about this here, it is illegal to refuse to register your guns, company policy!!!

__________________

An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!

JimRau is offline  
alsaqr Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Assault weapon hearing longunner Legal and Activism 38 03-01-2013 12:19 AM
Assault weapon locutus Legal and Activism 77 08-23-2012 11:10 PM
NYS Assault Weapon Ban question Vincine Legal and Activism 3 11-09-2011 02:24 AM
Seeking Assault Weapon Ban in WA Cnynrat Politics, Religion and Controversy 3 12-22-2009 06:40 PM
Here it comes assault weapon ban crowbar Politics, Religion and Controversy 73 03-11-2009 04:00 AM