You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - > General Firearms Forums > Legal and Activism >

The “Assault Weapon” Rebellion

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-12-2014, 05:35 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Overkill0084's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,909
Liked 3464 Times on 1746 Posts
Likes Given: 513

Default The “Assault Weapon” Rebellion

In the April issue of Townhall Magazine, Bearing Arms editor Bob Owens asks what would happen if a liberal government passed a new gun law but nobody obeyed it?
Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) signed what the Hartford Courant called “the toughest assault weapons legislation in the nation” last year. It required owners of semi-automatic firearms to register all firearms designated as “assault weapons” with the state government, along with any “high capacity” magazines they may own, by December 31, 2013.

The Malloy regime expected Connecticut residents to register somewhere between 372,000-400,000 firearms, and roughly 2 million firearm magazines that held more than 10 rounds before January 1.

What they got instead was defiance.

Just 50,000 of the estimated 372,000 so-called “assault weapons” in the state were registered by the deadline, or less than 15 percent. That’s still far better than the anemic 38,000 “high capacity” magazines that were reported to authorities, out of 2 million.

Why is compliance so low? We can’t know for sure. After all, the owners of these firearms and magazines refused to register, so we can’t easily interview them.

it continues...
I don't believe that I'm alone in the opinion that things are getting interesting. Liberal government is starting to get push back.

Of course that also reminds me of the old curse: "May you live in interesting times."
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see. - Ayn Rand
Overkill0084 is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 04-12-2014, 06:39 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lima,Ohio
Posts: 3,852
Liked 3947 Times on 1769 Posts
Likes Given: 3569


A big thumbs down to the cowards that registered. Two big thumbs up for the brave who resisted tyranny.
rjd3282 is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 06:46 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
clr8ter's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 4,015
Liked 1346 Times on 901 Posts
Likes Given: 860


Good for Conneticut!

And I continue to wonder; where did they get the figures for the magazines? Anyone can just walk into a store and pick one up. Anybody in Conn could come here and buy them...And just how did the morons expect to enforce something that is that vague?

If I owned a gun store, I would consider selling any hi-cap mags to conn residents at cost or below, if I could afford it.
I don't see what the problem is. Everybody is being nice, and getting along, and I, for one, am learning stuff. So, if you don't like the discussion, don't look at the thread. Or, simply cut to the chase, and close it.
Is there an age limit for a thread, after which we kill it?
clr8ter is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 07:00 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
JW357's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,716
Liked 3737 Times on 2289 Posts
Likes Given: 1224


50k registered is still too many, in my less than humble opinion.
Always have clean socks.
JW357 is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:14 PM   #5
Welcoming Committee/ Resident Pellet Gunner
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
FullautoUSA's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Marxachusetts
Posts: 2,627
Liked 627 Times on 478 Posts
Likes Given: 1111


And now it begins!


[COLOR="Blue"]See my pellet guns here:

FullautoUSA is offline  
DFlynt Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:24 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 6,007
Liked 3581 Times on 1966 Posts
Likes Given: 5346


The population of CT in 2010 was about 3,600,000. From 1998 to 2012 about 58 percent of CT residents bought guns: That figure comes to about 2,000,000 people buying guns in a 15 year period.

CT had defacto "assault weapons" registration for many years prior to the massacre of those teachers and kids by Adam Lanza and the draconian gun laws that followed. Furthermore, every gun sold in CT for many years has been "registered" with the state police at time of purchase. The gun dealer makes four copys of the DPS-3-C form. The dealer retains a copy, the buyer gets a copy, the local sheriff or chief of police gets a copy, and a copy is furnished to the firearms branch of the CT state police.

With minor exceptions (not included here), it is illegal, under Connecticut law, to possess assault weapons unless the owner possessed it before October 1, 1993 and obtained a DPS certificate of possession within the deadlines specified in law (CGS §§ 53-202d(a) and 53-202m).

Although the statute requiring the certificate does not use the term “registration,” the features of the law are comparable to the machine gun registration statutes. The certificate of possession must contain a description of the firearm that identifies it uniquely, including all identification marks. It must also include the owner's full name, address, date of birth, thumbprint, and any other information DPS deems appropriate (CGS § 53-202d).

Maybe the anti-gun politicians in CT don't care if folks "register" their "assault weapons" since they are already "registered".

Last edited by alsaqr; 04-12-2014 at 09:36 PM.
alsaqr is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:26 PM   #7
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22419 Times on 12500 Posts
Likes Given: 53672


a simple no, i will not comply speaks volumes of it's own.
Axxe55 is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 10:06 PM   #8
Supporting Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Dearhunter's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Charleston, SC,South Carolina
Posts: 1,909
Liked 1868 Times on 847 Posts
Likes Given: 484


Bad boy, bad boy, what ya gonna do when they come for you!! bad, boy, bad boy
US Naval Aviation AMSC 20 years ( retired) ASW/Aircrew Wings, P2V plane capt. Also a Tail hooker, US Naval Academy (DI) Shooting Instructor (Annapolis) NDW shooting team member. VN vet, Bluenose and Shellback.

Alway keep your six covered
Dearhunter is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 10:26 PM   #9
Supporting Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Sniper03's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,621
Liked 5775 Times on 2678 Posts
Likes Given: 2781


Good for those who did not register them. The Constitution gives us the right to rebel against Tyranny! And what they attempted to do is a violation of the Constitution. So I am disappointed with those who registered their weapons. The day may come when they regret their cowering down to the liberal progressive socialist morons in office! If I recall in History Hitler did the same thing with getting the people to register their weapons. I think like the Ranchers in Nevada, people are getting tired of it finally!!!!!

The Constitution is not an instrument for the Government to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the Government!
*Patrick Henry

“Americans have the right and advantage of being armed. Unlike the people of other countries, whose leaders are afraid to trust them with arms.”
James Madison. Author of the 2nd Amendment
Sniper03 is offline  
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 01:07 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 4,884
Liked 3546 Times on 2064 Posts
Likes Given: 2317


You have to stop talking about this here, it is illegal to refuse to register your guns, company policy!!!
An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!
JimRau is offline  
alsaqr Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Assault weapon hearing longunner Legal and Activism 38 03-01-2013 12:19 AM
Assault weapon locutus Legal and Activism 77 08-23-2012 11:10 PM
NYS Assault Weapon Ban question Vincine Legal and Activism 3 11-09-2011 02:24 AM
Seeking Assault Weapon Ban in WA Cnynrat Politics, Religion and Controversy 3 12-22-2009 06:40 PM
Here it comes assault weapon ban crowbar Politics, Religion and Controversy 73 03-11-2009 04:00 AM