Scope for a Remington 700 tactical?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Optics & Mounts > Scope for a Remington 700 tactical?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2013, 07:50 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sputnik1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 2,873
Liked 709 Times on 462 Posts
Likes Given: 1945

Default Scope for a Remington 700 tactical?

I just put an R700 tactical on layaway at my LGS and was looking for recommendations on a scope and mount?
I am going for, for lack of a better word a 'sniper' look, The rifle will mostly be for target use (100-600 yards)

I'm looking at spending $400 or less. Does anyone have any experience with the SWFA SS?

I know exactly nothing about scopes so any tips would be appreciated. Thanks.

Sorry for the lack of organization, I had to throw this together

__________________
Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid. - John Wayne

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Last edited by sputnik1988; 02-24-2013 at 01:06 AM.
sputnik1988 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-23-2013, 08:29 PM   #2
762
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
762's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 317
Liked 38 Times on 28 Posts
Likes Given: 37

Default

with that budget, look at a mil/mil SS 10x. an MOA scope will just confuse the hell out of you if you dont know anything about scopes. everything you hear about them is true. great glass, nice turrets (feel good, nice audible click), great customer service. i have one on my remington 700P. (in the middle of painting it right now)


i put a quarter on top of the turret to show the scale.


i have the SS rings too, they're ok, but i'd look at the burris xtreme rings if i were you.

as far as a base, get a one piece. it'll help strengthen up the action. lots of folks make them. i wouldnt get the cheapest one you could find, but you dont have to spend $200 on it either. i have a nightforce base on mine.

__________________

Remington 700P (suppressed) - .308
Norinco SKS - 7.62x39
Mossberg 500 - 12 ga.
Savage FV64 - .22
Marlin Model 60 - .22 PARTS FOR SALE
EAA Witness P - 9mm
AR15 - 5.56/.223
AR15 SPR - 5.56/.223

762 is offline  
sputnik1988 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 08:35 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sputnik1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 2,873
Liked 709 Times on 462 Posts
Likes Given: 1945

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 762 View Post
with that budget, look at a mil/mil SS 10x. an MOA scope will just confuse the hell out of you if you dont know anything about scopes. everything you hear about them is true. great glass, nice turrets (feel good, nice audible click), great customer service. i have one on my remington 700P. (in the middle of painting it right now)


i put a quarter on top of the turret to show the scale.


i have the SS rings too, they're ok, but i'd look at the burris xtreme rings if i were you.

as far as a base, get a one piece. it'll help strengthen up the action. lots of folks make them. i wouldnt get the cheapest one you could find, but you dont have to spend $200 on it either. i have a nightforce base on mine.
Thanks 762, good info.

I can't see the pics though.

I also have a basic understanding of MOA, would i still want to stay away from moa scopes? And what do the numbers mean? Like 10x42, 12x42 ect.
__________________
Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid. - John Wayne

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Last edited by sputnik1988; 02-23-2013 at 09:13 PM.
sputnik1988 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 09:22 PM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Jagermeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,815
Liked 3861 Times on 2305 Posts
Likes Given: 3233

Default

Military have used scopes that have just a crosshair with/without beads for ages. You do not need confusing lights and gadgets. You will never use it. Your price range is hard, since you need good glass to shoot long distance (for visual). I personally hunt with a Meopta Meostar 4-12x56 with red dot for night hunting. It is a 1000 dollar glass though. You need at least x56 for low light conditions. The red dot also helps at the range when my shooting kicks up a lot of dirt/dust. Either way best to spend a 1000 at one time on a good scope, then a 1000 replacing the crappy scopes.

__________________
Jagermeister is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 09:23 PM   #5
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 9,362
Liked 5757 Times on 3256 Posts
Likes Given: 5192

Default

4-12X42= variable (zoom) from 4X to12X with a 42 MM objective bell (front lens)

I would look at a Nikon, either 3-9X50 or 4-12X40.

__________________
“We sleep safely at night because rough men stand ready to visit violence on those who would harm us.”


Winston Churchill
locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 09:51 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sputnik1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 2,873
Liked 709 Times on 462 Posts
Likes Given: 1945

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post
4-12X42= variable (zoom) from 4X to12X with a 42 MM objective bell (front lens)

I would look at a Nikon, either 3-9X50 or 4-12X40.
If it only says 10x42 does that mean its a fixed 10x scope?
__________________
Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid. - John Wayne

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
sputnik1988 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 10:23 PM   #7
762
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
762's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 317
Liked 38 Times on 28 Posts
Likes Given: 37

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik1988 View Post
I also have a basic understanding of MOA, would i still want to stay away from moa scopes? And what do the numbers mean? Like 10x42, 12x42 ect.
it depends. when you start using a mil-dot reticle with an MOA scope it can be confusing if you want to use the mils as holdovers. for instance, with my MOA/mil SS 10x scope, i know that with a 100 yard zero, i can hold at the last mil on the bottom of the cross and expect a hit at 400-500 yards with the load i'm shooting. 500 would be pushing it though. it's not hard figure out once you've studied it enough.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sputnik1988 View Post
If it only says 10x42 does that mean its a fixed 10x scope?
yep
__________________

Remington 700P (suppressed) - .308
Norinco SKS - 7.62x39
Mossberg 500 - 12 ga.
Savage FV64 - .22
Marlin Model 60 - .22 PARTS FOR SALE
EAA Witness P - 9mm
AR15 - 5.56/.223
AR15 SPR - 5.56/.223

762 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2013, 11:54 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TheSadPanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: St. Louis,Missouri
Posts: 1,291
Liked 379 Times on 252 Posts
Likes Given: 59

Default

My setup is a r700 with a vortex 2.5-10 x44, vortex precision rings, and a Midwest Industries base. One thing to keep in mind is that if you are going the distance (1000yds) youll want a 20MOA base. Youre asking an awful lot out of a scope that only costs $400. The Vortex was 400 and it will let you do 1000yd shots, but the odds will not be in your favor. In all honesty, you need to cough up a fee more dollars for a better scope.

image-2935252330.jpg  
__________________

"You know what happens to men who go looking for blood? They find it." - Kind Old Man

TheSadPanda is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 12:54 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sputnik1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Bluegrass state
Posts: 2,873
Liked 709 Times on 462 Posts
Likes Given: 1945

Default

I guess my definition of long range is different from others. I'm thinking 600 yards or less, most of the time 200-300

In my area, asking for a shot over 500 yards is pretty unrealistic. Id say 80% of the area is good for 200 or less. That's one reason I would prefer a variable power.

__________________
Life is hard; it's harder if you're stupid. - John Wayne

ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Last edited by sputnik1988; 02-24-2013 at 01:04 AM.
sputnik1988 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2013, 12:55 AM   #10
Crazy Azz Redneck
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Txhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,523
Liked 1196 Times on 686 Posts
Likes Given: 575

Default

$400 isn't going to get you much of a scope,especially if your wanting to really shoot/see targets at long range. Scopes in that price range are great for hunting scopes,but not very good for long range.Most lack having enough adjustment capability to shoot past 600 yards.
The cheapest priced scopes will be fixed magnification like the SWFA 10x42,and if you are only wanting to shoot targets,they work great for that. High magnification fixed power scopes usually won't work very well if you want to go hunting with them at shorter range,they have a small field of view compared with a variable powered scope that can be turned down in magnification.

Mil-dot or Modified Mil-dot reticles are what most long range shooters like,since they give you holdover marks on the reticle that help the shooter with ranging targets,and allowing for windage changes easily.But you also need to learn how to use these reticles,and the distances in mils or moa that they account for in that particular scope.
You will want to get a scope that has turrets that match the reticle. Either a Mil/Mil or MOA/MOA. I prefer using MOA/MOA,myself.
Most cheaper cost scopes that have a Mil-dot reticle have MOA turrets,and although they can be operated by the shooter,it takes more time to learn the math between the two measurements.
You also need to decide on which Focal plane you want to have the reticle in. First Focal plane scopes are easier to learn mil-dot style reticles with because the reticle size grows with the target image as the magnification goes up.
A Second Focal plane reticle scope,the reticle remains the same size,but the target image grows as the magnification goes up,and you have to know what the reticle (dots) measurements are at the magnification you have the scope turned to. Most are set up to be read at certain magnifications such as 12x,depending on the scope,but if you know/learn how to do the math,you can use the reticle at any power.
First focal plane scopes cost more than Second focal plane scopes.

The lower tier of decent long range scopes starts off around $750 for variable magnification scopes. The Weaver Tactical scope is a very good starter scope,and it even has a First Focal plane reticle.They come in a 3-15x50 or a 4-20x50 scope.They also have very good glass in them.

The Vortex Viper PST has a great following,and they can be had in First or Second focal plane.

I like the Sightron SIII scopes,they only come in Second focal plane,but they have amazing glass,track/repeat excellent,and for the price are hard to beat. I have 5 of them,and have never had an issue with any of them.

For a mount,I'd go with a good 1pc base-Weaver,EGW,Ken Farrell,etc.,and the only rings that I will use are Burris Signature Zee rings.

Savage 10FCP-308 & 110FLP-25/06 Ken Farrell base's,Burris Signature Zee rings,Sightron SIII LRMD 6-24x50 scopes-


Custom built Savage 10-6.5 Creedmoor Weaver base,Burris Signature Zee rings,Sightron SIII MOA-2 6-24x50-

__________________
Txhillbilly is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Remington 700 sps tactical Brettad789 General Rifle Discussion 11 09-15-2012 07:34 AM
Tactical scope or rds tenntyrant AR-15 Discussion 3 04-16-2012 10:08 PM
Remington 870 Tactical Rodeoclown83 General Shotgun Discussion 5 02-19-2012 05:53 PM
***Remington 700 XCR Tactical Help*** snow General Rifle Discussion 6 01-20-2011 01:15 AM
Remington 870 tactical jdnossaman General Shotgun Discussion 10 02-04-2009 03:43 AM