Scope mounting height


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Optics & Mounts > Scope mounting height

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2010, 01:40 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
lonyaeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bandera,Texas
Posts: 10,381
Liked 58 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default Scope mounting height

I always hear talk about getting the scope mounted as low and close to the barrel as you can, which I guess makes sense from a physics point of view.

But how important is it really? Is the reason for saying that because it makes it easier for the proper cheek-weld?

In trying to mount a Nikon Monarch on a Savage rifle using low rings, I'm finding that the ocular bell is too low and hits on the bolt, but the elevation for the objective is fine. I guess this means I'm going to have to go with higher rings.

What is the downside of doing this? Thanks for your help.



__________________
lonyaeger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 05-10-2010, 03:45 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 34 Times on 29 Posts

Default

The biggest downside is going to be the height of the centerline of the scope. If it is too high then you will have to adjust the position of your head on the stock. If your scope is too tall then you end up with just your chin on the stock and that is not a good solid head position.

I found that when using a Standard Leupold base (One dove tail one adjustable) that med height rings will work for 32-44mm scopes for the most part.



__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 03:56 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
lonyaeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bandera,Texas
Posts: 10,381
Liked 58 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Right, but if I installed an adjustable cheekpiece, thereby making my cheekweld right.....will the height of the scope negatively affect the accuracy or the adjustability of the scope?

__________________
lonyaeger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 03:57 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
lonyaeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bandera,Texas
Posts: 10,381
Liked 58 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpttango30 View Post

I found that when using a Standard Leupold base (One dove tail one adjustable) that med height rings will work for 32-44mm scopes for the most part.
But you've often said that you much prefer a one-piece base and I completely agree with that.
__________________
lonyaeger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 05:30 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 34 Times on 29 Posts

Default

I have 1 two piece base on one of my guns only because I had to do it that way.

I feel the advantages of the 1 piece out weigh any negitive aspect someone might try to come up with.

As far as scope height negitivly affecting the accuracy of a rifle. I doubt a single person on here no matter how good they think they are (Me included) are not going to notice the affect of a 2" scope height over a 1.5" height.
There is a picture in that thread that shows a pistol with a special scope mount that is 6" tall I believe.
Want to put an Aimpoint on a Ruger rifle. - THR

I like mine low because I like the way they look. My 308 (2 piece base) is goign to get a new stock in the next year. This stock will be built for how high I have the scope mounted now.

__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2010, 12:01 AM   #6
Crazy Azz Redneck
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Txhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,523
Liked 1196 Times on 686 Posts
Likes Given: 575

Default

Lon,What base & rings are you using?

How much of the Bolt handle hits the scope? Medium rings will be about .120 taller and should clear the handle.It also won't affect you cheekweld enough to worry about it.

Make sure to measure you eye clearance on the scope,you don't want to wind up with a black eye the first time you fire it. LOL

Maybe you can wait until I can come up to shoot it,and I'll bring you some SPECIAL little handloads for your little 300WM. Ha-ha-ha.
I'll shoot'em right beside you with mine. THB

__________________
Txhillbilly is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2010, 12:58 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
lonyaeger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bandera,Texas
Posts: 10,381
Liked 58 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

We'll git er done, THB!



__________________
lonyaeger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Torque pressure in scope mounting lonyaeger Optics & Mounts 6 03-19-2010 01:48 AM
Scope mounting issue liberty1 General Rifle Discussion 3 05-16-2009 03:07 PM
Remington 510 targetmaster scope mounting Trigcure Optics & Mounts 1 05-13-2009 10:54 AM
Mounting a scope on M44 dragunovsks Curio & Relic Discussion 2 09-01-2008 05:12 AM
mount and scope mounting techniques boomer Gunsmithing Forum 2 11-25-2007 04:30 PM