Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Optics & Mounts > Completely Clueless

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-20-2012, 03:02 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 832
Liked 68 Times on 53 Posts
Likes Given: 113

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTJ View Post
The 243 is a very accurate round and the 77 is a nice rifle. Good for varmints through deer. For target and hunting a good variable in the range of 3-12X or 4-16X would be good options. 3-9X would keep the cost lower in good glass. I would rather have a 3-9X in a better scope than a higher power in a cheaper scope. For a USA made scope look at Leupold/Redfield and possibly Burris. Not all of the Burris scopes are USA. Lots of good imports out there.
Perfect!

This is the kind of thing I'm clueless about, the different power levels of scopes and how to match them up with what gun and calibe you're shooting. I had a felling that Leupold was one of the brands I would be looking at. Never heard of Burris, I'll check them out too!

Thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSGN_Doc View Post
I will second the Leupold/Redfield recommendation and add Nikon to the list along with Bushnell 3200 or 4200 series scopes as solid but affordable scopes.
I also love photography and I'm a Nikon guy. I was wondering how their gun scopes were. I assumed they were good. They aren't cheap, and Nikon does make good optics. I had completely forgot about Bushnell. I have nice set of binoculars from them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpattersonnh View Post
Ok, If there is a possibility of Deer hunting, That changes things. A Weaver V10 is a VG scope at the bottom of the spectrum. I've had one on my 7mm Rem Mag for a few years now. Could be used for both. I really like Sightron scopes, The SII 3-12x42mm. Either the Standard SII or the SII big sky are great scopes. The MOA adjustments are exactly repeatable as the design is far superior to other manufacturers.
That's also good to know as my next rifle will be a Remington 700 in 7mm.
__________________
Polygon is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 05:26 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
M1Anut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 206
Liked 97 Times on 44 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I've got a Leupold mark4 m3 3.5x10 on my 700. It's a 1 moa click. Zero at 100, then dial your range. It's calibrated for the 168 gr. match bthp. It's a bit pricey, but an awesome scope.

__________________
M1Anut is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 12:50 AM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,913
Liked 671 Times on 461 Posts
Likes Given: 674

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polygon View Post
Perfect!

This is the kind of thing I'm clueless about, the different power levels of scopes and how to match them up with what gun and calibe you're shooting. I had a felling that Leupold was one of the brands I would be looking at. Never heard of Burris, I'll check them out too!

Thanks!



I also love photography and I'm a Nikon guy. I was wondering how their gun scopes were. I assumed they were good. They aren't cheap, and Nikon does make good optics. I had completely forgot about Bushnell. I have nice set of binoculars from them.



That's also good to know as my next rifle will be a Remington 700 in 7mm.
I truely don't normally do this, but take a look at the Savage 110/111 series. Also the Howa 1500. My Savage is from the Clinton Era, no accutrigger. It carries like a 2x4, but is so accurate. I have not found a bullet load combo it shoots badly. Any 150gr SP from any factory shoots MOA or better at 100 yards. It is the one hunter I have that is going no where, no matter what. Being a Mauser guy, it really takes alot to impress me, but this rifle does.
As I stated the Howa 1500 is another great alternitive to the 700. I think it is superior, but that is my Humble opinion. The Ruger should be the sh!t as it has a true Mauser action, but they never seem to get all the parts correct to make it the best U.S. made rifle. If you have one that shoots great it is worth more then you can put a tag on. They are either stellar, or need a complete re-barrel. Makes no sense.
__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2012, 01:35 AM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 575
Liked 321 Times on 206 Posts
Likes Given: 338

Default

One thing to consider also is where you will be doing most of your shooting? Mountainous, dense forests, open prairies, etc.
I come from Idaho, and down there I could get away with a 3x9xwhatever, but up here in Alaska, a 1.5x6 is more appropriate to even focus through the dense brush or trees. A larger scope needs further distance to focus on its closest point and is pretty much useless in the trees.

And don't settle for cheap rings.

__________________
AsSeenOnTV is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 06:36 PM   #15
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,766
Liked 5129 Times on 2924 Posts
Likes Given: 4338

Default

I would say get a Leupold or a Nikon Monarch. 3-9X50 or 3.5-10X50 would be ideal.

You want a large objective bell to give a 7mm exit pupil up to at least 6 or 7 power.

If you're into cameras, you're probably familar with exit pupils, and lens quality. There are less expensive scopes to be sure. But from your camera hobby, you probably already know that you get what you pay for, and a "smokin deal" that looks too good to be true usually is.

good luck!

__________________

"Politics is the art of the possible" Otto von Bismarck.

locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 01:54 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 832
Liked 68 Times on 53 Posts
Likes Given: 113

Default

So, here's a couple I'm looking at.

Nikon ProStaff 4-12 x 40.

Nikon ProStaff 3-9 x 50.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpattersonnh View Post
I truely don't normally do this, but take a look at the Savage 110/111 series. Also the Howa 1500. My Savage is from the Clinton Era, no accutrigger. It carries like a 2x4, but is so accurate. I have not found a bullet load combo it shoots badly. Any 150gr SP from any factory shoots MOA or better at 100 yards. It is the one hunter I have that is going no where, no matter what. Being a Mauser guy, it really takes alot to impress me, but this rifle does.
As I stated the Howa 1500 is another great alternitive to the 700. I think it is superior, but that is my Humble opinion. The Ruger should be the sh!t as it has a true Mauser action, but they never seem to get all the parts correct to make it the best U.S. made rifle. If you have one that shoots great it is worth more then you can put a tag on. They are either stellar, or need a complete re-barrel. Makes no sense.
I'll have to look into those when I get my next rifle. My dad has loved his 77 and it shoots great. That's why I decided to get one. I guess we'll see how mine is when it shows up. Luckily my uncle is a gunsmith if I need one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AsSeenOnTV View Post
One thing to consider also is where you will be doing most of your shooting? Mountainous, dense forests, open prairies, etc.
I come from Idaho, and down there I could get away with a 3x9xwhatever, but up here in Alaska, a 1.5x6 is more appropriate to even focus through the dense brush or trees. A larger scope needs further distance to focus on its closest point and is pretty much useless in the trees.

And don't settle for cheap rings.
Being in Utah, I could be in the mountains to open prairies. Now there's something I'm also clueless on, rings. Do you have any suggestions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post
I would say get a Leupold or a Nikon Monarch. 3-9X50 or 3.5-10X50 would be ideal.

You want a large objective bell to give a 7mm exit pupil up to at least 6 or 7 power.

If you're into cameras, you're probably familar with exit pupils, and lens quality. There are less expensive scopes to be sure. But from your camera hobby, you probably already know that you get what you pay for, and a "smokin deal" that looks too good to be true usually is.

good luck!
Haha, yeah. That's for sure, you do get what you pay for. I think I'm going to go with a Nikkon scope. It's more in my budget, which I've decided is around the $200.
__________________
Polygon is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 05:48 PM   #17
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,766
Liked 5129 Times on 2924 Posts
Likes Given: 4338

Default

[QUOTE=Polygon;991740]So, here's a couple I'm looking at.

Nikon ProStaff 4-12 x 40.

Nikon ProStaff 3-9 x 50.




Those are Nikon's "economy" models. Good scopes, I'm sure. But not in the same class with Nikon's "Monarch" line.

__________________

"Politics is the art of the possible" Otto von Bismarck.

locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 09:42 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Molon Labe,Missouri
Posts: 495
Liked 69 Times on 57 Posts
Likes Given: 31

Default

I got a Weatherby in 243 and have mounted a Weaver Classic V16. Great scope. Using Weaver bases W/Weaver QuadLok rings. Good solid shooting platform, just make sure of "Locktiting" down those base screws.
Other scopes to look at would be Nikon Buckmaster and Vortex Crossfire or Viper.
Del

__________________
Triumphman is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 09:59 PM   #19
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,978
Liked 2195 Times on 1097 Posts
Likes Given: 1123

Default

Polygon,

As has been mentioned Leupold is my first preference but have some Nikons also and they are good scopes. Both have good glass and are very clear! Taking into consideration your rifle I would recommend getting your scope ring bases and Medium Height Rings. That will let you put about any scope on it you choose. The 3X9, 3.5X10 or 4X12 Power Scopes would be a good choice since the lower power would also be good for closer shots on game or in dim light. But you would have enough power to see things well at a distance on the top end. I would recommend a Scope which has the positive Click Adjustments on it for your first scope rather than the Friction movement turrets adjustments. Easier to keep track of when adjusting and less frustrating for most people. You can feel and hear the clicks on the one I am speaking of. Then there is 1 inch Tube Scopes which most are. I prefer the 30MM Tube Scope myself since it lets a lot more light in. For Example the Leupold VXIII 3.5X10 Model#54912 for example. But a good inch tube scope will do you just fine. Also the 243 is a great little caliber rifle. Flat shooting and accurate.
Good Luck with your choice!

__________________

The Constitution is not an instrument for the Government to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the Government!
*Patrick Henry

Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

-- John F. Kennedy

Sniper03 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 05:09 PM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Polygon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Utah
Posts: 832
Liked 68 Times on 53 Posts
Likes Given: 113

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by locutus View Post
Those are Nikon's "economy" models. Good scopes, I'm sure. But not in the same class with Nikon's "Monarch" line.
Yeah, I'm aware. I was thinking of maybe going the budget route. They seems to be great value for the money. However, I'm not opposed to spending more for the Monarch. What do you think of these two?

Nikon Monarch 4-16x42SF

Nikon Monarch 3-12x42SF

Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumphman View Post
I got a Weatherby in 243 and have mounted a Weaver Classic V16. Great scope. Using Weaver bases W/Weaver QuadLok rings. Good solid shooting platform, just make sure of "Locktiting" down those base screws. Other scopes to look at would be Nikon Buckmaster and Vortex Crossfire or Viper.
Del
I'll take a look at those.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper03 View Post
Polygon,

As has been mentioned Leupold is my first preference but have some Nikons also and they are good scopes. Both have good glass and are very clear! Taking into consideration your rifle I would recommend getting your scope ring bases and Medium Height Rings. That will let you put about any scope on it you choose. The 3X9, 3.5X10 or 4X12 Power Scopes would be a good choice since the lower power would also be good for closer shots on game or in dim light. But you would have enough power to see things well at a distance on the top end. I would recommend a Scope which has the positive Click Adjustments on it for your first scope rather than the Friction movement turrets adjustments. Easier to keep track of when adjusting and less frustrating for most people. You can feel and hear the clicks on the one I am speaking of. Then there is 1 inch Tube Scopes which most are. I prefer the 30MM Tube Scope myself since it lets a lot more light in. For Example the Leupold VXIII 3.5X10 Model#54912 for example. But a good inch tube scope will do you just fine. Also the 243 is a great little caliber rifle. Flat shooting and accurate.
Good Luck with your choice!
Thanks. Perhaps you can help me find some scope rings? I've been trying to find some and I don't know what would be good ones to get. It seems my gun has integrated mounts, but I don't know what for. Probably weaver, but Ruger's site doesn't say. It does some with a pair of rings, but I'm assuming they're not very good.
__________________
Polygon is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
New York Times clueless AcidFlashGordon The Club House 10 07-27-2012 02:45 PM
Clueless coyote_killer3 Optics & Mounts 5 03-13-2012 04:35 AM
Clueless warrenstipe Blackpowder & Musket 7 06-06-2010 02:34 AM
completely clueless newby262001 General Handgun Discussion 9 02-21-2009 01:45 AM
clueless sethma General Rifle Discussion 4 09-21-2007 04:02 PM



Newest Threads