 |
|
10-27-2012, 01:34 AM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
3-9x40 vs 4-12x40
I just purchased a used savage 7mm rem mag. I will be ordering a scope for it at the beginning of next month and wanted some opinions on what to get. I have narrowed the brands down to three. Redfield revenge, burris fullfield II, or a nikon prostaff. I understand the difference in the scope sizes I was wondering if I really need to get the higher powered scope. The max distance I will be shooting is 350 yrds. Was hoping someone could tell me if its worth the extra money.
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 04:56 AM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lake Havasu,Arizona
Posts: 4,378
Liked 669 Times on 386 Posts Likes Given: 279
|
9x at 350 yards is like 1x at 40 yards.
__________________
"I would not be an old man if I had not been an armed young man." JTJ
Patron Member NRA
"As democracy is perfected, the office of President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and complete narcissistic moron."
--- H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 05:10 AM
|
#3
|
|
'Chu Lookin At, Seal-Boy?!!!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Ferriday,LA
Posts: 1,332
Liked 649 Times on 367 Posts Likes Given: 5125
|
what is the price diff?
ask the salesman/woman if they will walk outside with you (with both scopes), and letchu use both to look @ a distant object with.
then, make your choice. you'll see.....quick, fast, and in a hurry what the difference is.
just remember, you get what you pay for. the 3 x 9 might cost more, but you most likely are gettin a better scope. NOT ALWAYS, but most of the time............even if it's just better glass and glass coating(s).
__________________
"they may get me in a rush, but not before i turn your head into a canoe....." -Kurt Russell (Wyatt Earp) in Tombstone
"if it was up to me, i'd like to see, this country run,
the way it used to be, the way it oughta be, just like it's done, OUT HERE.........WAY OUT HERE." -Josh Thompson, country music singer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0sYnro_3Rc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3R00rlA0S0&NR=1
PEOPLE TEND TO ACT LIKE SHEEP, BOY I LOVE MUTTON! -Me
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 11:26 AM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: nowhere,that other state
Posts: 673
Liked 158 Times on 97 Posts Likes Given: 189
|
I myself prefer 4-12x or larger scopes. My go to hunting rifle is a 4-12x
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 12:41 PM
|
#5
|
|
Aspiring Mall Ninja
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Here in the holler....
Posts: 3,583
Liked 621 Times on 406 Posts Likes Given: 776
|
I like the 4x12's to be honest. Though I have some of both.
__________________
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 01:24 PM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 14
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by USEBOTHHANDS
what is the price diff?
ask the salesman/woman if they will walk outside with you (with both scopes), and letchu use both to look @ a distant object with.
then, make your choice. you'll see.....quick, fast, and in a hurry what the difference is.
just remember, you get what you pay for. the 3 x 9 might cost more, but you most likely are gettin a better scope. NOT ALWAYS, but most of the time............even if it's just better glass and glass coating(s).
|
I have looked through all three and the while they all have different pros and cons they are all pretty equal.
Burris 3-9x40 is 130
Nikon 4-12x40 is 200
Redfield 4-12x40 is 190
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 01:31 PM
|
#7
|
|
People need to have thicker skin!!!
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 2,325
Liked 639 Times on 407 Posts Likes Given: 11
|
I've been looking at a Bushnell Banner 4X16. Any advice on this scope?
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 01:40 PM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Garden City,Missouri
Posts: 200
Liked 13 Times on 12 Posts Likes Given: 5
|
For a hunting scope a good 3x9 or 4x12 is a great power-range scope. It mostly depends on which one gives ya better glass and a more robust scope, especially for those Magnum or harder thumping rifles. Virtually any scope made Today gives you a good picture in broad Daylight, BUT it's the BETTER GLASS that gives you the "Brighter/Clearer" picture in Dawn and Dusk/wooded scenerios where most larger game does their feeding near backdrops like dark forested tree lines or edge of open fields where they rely on fast escape routes, and Scope's ability to make out color differences when shadows are involved. The Redfield/Nikon/Burris lineup is very good in their scopes while at a lower cost.
The Burris FullfieldII(Japan/Philippines) models are superb and the scopes W/E adjustments are positive clicks. If you like Nikon, which I also do, try to get the Buckmaster model(Japan) as it's a much better, stouter scope and will hold up better to that 7mm. As to the Redfield, go for the Revolution models as they're also much better made. Lots of folks do like the Prostaff and certainly nothing wrong with them, but for a harder kicking rifle, I would spend that extra $75 to upgrade to a longer lasting, better scope. I own Burris FullfieldII, Nikon Buckmaster, and Redfield Revolution, and Weaver Classic scopes and hunt with my rifles also.
Del
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 01:51 PM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Garden City,Missouri
Posts: 200
Liked 13 Times on 12 Posts Likes Given: 5
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fathead00
I've been looking at a Bushnell Banner 4X16. Any advice on this scope?
|
Surprisingly, a good little scope, and a few different models to choose from. However, I wouldn't use it on anything larger than a 223(Bolt action---not AR style). My opinion is it just won't stand up to heavy recoil over time. I have this scope on a little Savage 22LR and it does very well and I do like the Illuminated Recticle for when in heavy woods, Squirrel hunting. I also have a older Banner Dusk/Dawn 6-18x50 on a Target Ruger 10/22 and it does very well, but again not a recoil heavy rifle.
Del
|
|
|
10-27-2012, 02:45 PM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Houston,texas
Posts: 207
Liked 18 Times on 16 Posts Likes Given: 1
|
You might want to give a look at the Weaver 40/44 3.8-12X44 scope. Very good optics in it, has an aspherical lens system which was a design based on what was used in 35mm camera lens. Originally used in Simmons AETEC scopes years ago and it had quite a following back then. Have one myself and love it.
Presently, www.natchezss.com has a sale on the Weaver 40/44 aspherical lens scopes they stock. 3.8-12x44 is $140 plus shipping. This scope sells for $180 to $200 elsewhere. Good buy on it. I'd buy another one, but just shoot paper and prefer higher power scopes for my target shooting. Be aware, not all 40/44 scopes have aspherical lens system.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|