XD 40 Vs. XD 45 - Page 2
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > XD Forum > XD 40 Vs. XD 45

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-2009, 03:03 AM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Chester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 327
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobiesun View Post
I have a bit of a delema on which XD to buy. I love .45's but I have been looking at the XDM 40 for quite some time. I know as soon as I get the .40xdm they are going to come out with a 4" barrel, XDM .45. Both feel good in the hand and there are 13 of those phatty's in the mag. Plus I have a 1911 .45 and a million spend rounds. I just can't make up my mind. The XDM fits better in my hand but I love .45's. What about reloads in XD's? That would make a difference. I have a 33 glock (357 sig). That thing cannot have any reloads at all. I don't believe most or all glocks cannot either. Please aid in my decision.
Looking back I think i should have bought the XD 40 in sub-compact, Mostly because the 4" is almost too big for a cc weapon. Don't get me wrong the full size is a very fine gun, I would have still bought an XD no matter what.
__________________

The only times in this nations history that anything great happened it was because normal men put aside their petty differences and fight for a common cause.

Chester


"The great object is that every man be armed . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution.)

Chester is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 01:40 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 10
Default

Well Chester, thanks for your input. The only thing is that I have a Glock 33 subcompact (357 sig). All I would have to do to make it a 40 would be to buy a 40 barrel. And truthfully I don't mind the 357 sig. Ammo is expensive but the round is great. I wish I could just make up my mind and get it. I hear what you are saying about the xdm40 and the xd45. They are a bit big. The 45 is 1/2" shorter and yeah it may be difficult to carry. Darn darn darn. Now the milspec 45 with three or three and a half" barrel is running through my head. Low rounds but small and narrow. Thanks.

__________________
Hobiesun is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2009, 03:41 PM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Chester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 327
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hobiesun View Post
Well Chester, thanks for your input. The only thing is that I have a Glock 33 subcompact (357 sig). All I would have to do to make it a 40 would be to buy a 40 barrel. And truthfully I don't mind the 357 sig. Ammo is expensive but the round is great. I wish I could just make up my mind and get it. I hear what you are saying about the xdm40 and the xd45. They are a bit big. The 45 is 1/2" shorter and yeah it may be difficult to carry. Darn darn darn. Now the milspec 45 with three or three and a half" barrel is running through my head. Low rounds but small and narrow. Thanks.
Why not get a XD in 40 sub-compact. It's a great gun and easily concealed.
The price ain't bad either.
__________________

The only times in this nations history that anything great happened it was because normal men put aside their petty differences and fight for a common cause.

Chester


"The great object is that every man be armed . . . Everyone who is able may have a gun." (Patrick Henry, in the Virginia Convention on the ratification of the Constitution.)

Chester is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2009, 12:33 AM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 10
Default

Chester, I guess if I already didn't have the 33 glock I probably would be going after a sub-compact. A barrel for the glock is $99 to make the 357 a .40. A sub-compact xd would cost me somewhere around $550. I wish someone would make a sub-compact .45. But anyways, I think if I was going to go with a .40 it would either be the XDM. Just don't know.

__________________
Hobiesun is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2009, 10:24 PM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fxstchewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Newton,NC
Posts: 121
Default

I have more control with the .45 than the .40, so i would say the .45acp.

__________________
fxstchewy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 06:15 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 9,639
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts

Default

Just my opinion, the one shot kill round is a myth. Placement is a huge factor, so more important than the caliber is what round you can fire accurately.

Stories abound of people being hit by stray .50 rounds and living to tell the tale.

What is more comfortable for you?

__________________
Benning Boy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 09:40 PM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 3,621
Liked 11 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

NO, it's NOT a myth. How many times have you actually HAD to use deadly force-either in combat OR defense? The trick is to hit em, but to blow the biggest darn hole you can in them. The simple FACT remains, the bigger bullet, with all else equal, the bigger hole. And the bigger hole in somebody, the faster they'll drop.









Quote:
Originally Posted by Benning Boy View Post
Just my opinion, the one shot kill round is a myth. Placement is a huge factor, so more important than the caliber is what round you can fire accurately.

Stories abound of people being hit by stray .50 rounds and living to tell the tale.

What is more comfortable for you?
__________________
stalkingbear is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 10:31 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: everywhere
Posts: 9,639
Liked 9 Times on 9 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stalkingbear View Post
NO, it's NOT a myth. How many times have you actually HAD to use deadly force-either in combat OR defense? The trick is to hit em, but to blow the biggest darn hole you can in them. The simple FACT remains, the bigger bullet, with all else equal, the bigger hole. And the bigger hole in somebody, the faster they'll drop.
So, essentially what you're saying is a round exists that will kill consistently when it hits someone in their big toe?

A whole lot of factors beside bullet diameter come into play, and it's not an exact science. 250 lb. rapists have been dropped with one shot from a .25, and drunks have taken a whole cylinder in the chest from a .38 and kept walking.

The OP said he had heard that the .40 was a better one shot kill round. The .45 is larger.

I think debate over superior calibers is moot, as it is more important to hit a target effectively than to rely on the number on the case to do the work.

Again, only my humble opinion.
__________________
Benning Boy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 11:14 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 3,621
Liked 11 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Benning boy-please read my post more carefully. I distinctly said all else being equal-that means assuming same shot placement. Also you are supposedly quoting isolated instances instead of being able to speak from practical experience. Remember-I never said ANYTHING about dropping somebody by shooting them in the big toe so PLEASE DON'T TRY to twist my post around until you've had the same experiences I have and THEN you'll be qualified to discuss with me on same level.

Stalkingbear out and done with this thread.

__________________
stalkingbear is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2009, 11:41 PM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SGT-MILLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,354
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts

Default

The .40 was originally designed as a less potent alternative to the 10mm round. The .40 is right in between the 9mm and the 10mm rounds. Instead, it became compared to the .45 round when the ballistics are completely different.

Let the numbers show themselves.

.40 S & W Information: .40 S&W - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

.45 ACP Information: .45 ACP - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The .40 round is faster, but the .45 ACP round will trasmit more kinetic energy to the target.

Think of it this way: Taking a .40 caliber round in the chest might be like getting hit with a large, 23 ounce, framing hammer at full swing. I imagine that taking a .45 round would be like getting hit with a full-up sledge hammer at full swing.

Both will work just fine, but I would put my money on the .45 ACP.

....or you can be like me. I have a .45 ACP and a .40 S&W pistol.

__________________
"TRAIN WITH WHAT YOU HAVE, NOT WITH WHAT YOU WISH YOU HAVE."
SGT-MILLER is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes