Torn. 40 or 45?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > XD Forum > Torn. 40 or 45?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-30-2007, 04:48 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3
Default Torn. 40 or 45?

I've shot both and just can't decide on which one I want.

Could really use some feedback on which you prefer and why.

__________________
jdsaler is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-31-2007, 05:22 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
allmons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Athens
Posts: 364
Default I have to go with the .45

The recoil of the .40 is sharp. I find the .45 more controllable and the ammo is relatively plentiful and inexpensive. There is more than 100 years of real world ballistic data that suggests a near perfect bullet for combat. Why change for an unproven format? You can hot load 9mm to match the .40, but why? The .45 is there for you.

__________________

Fire everyone in Congress NOW.

allmons is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 01:34 AM   #3
Administrator
FTF_ADMIN.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
notdku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hill Country,Texas
Posts: 5,563
Liked 698 Times on 387 Posts
Likes Given: 729

Default

I suggest you go to the range and rent both if you can. I went with the 45 just for recoil reasons. I felt my accuracy was better with the 45 at quick shooting because of the recoil difference.

__________________

Not Registered? Register now! - It's free and helps the community grow.

notdku is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 03:56 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
Default

Go with the .45, 100 years of succesful use can't be wrong. Many military units are begging to have the 45's back, and many police departments such as mine are starting to ditch the 40's and adopting the 45's. if the 45 didn't work, it would not be the continued success and most carried weapon of all time.

__________________
Captain Skippy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2007, 02:57 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
LunchBox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30
Default

At this point, I would have to say .40 only because I dont have much shooting time with the .45. As someone else had suggested, go to a range and rent both..

__________________
LunchBox is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2007, 01:52 AM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BrassMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SW Illinois
Posts: 325
Liked 9 Times on 8 Posts

Default

I have always found the .45 to be more accurate, but YMMV. The .40 is a snappy round and hard to control during rapid fire (double taps, ect). Honestly I sold off all my .40 stuff as I just never saw any purpose for the round. If you want compact stoping power just load a 9mm with +p. If you want real stopping power from a pistol then good old .45 is hard to beat.

__________________
BrassMonkey is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 10:28 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
Default

I used to shoot lots of 40 with my Sig, Ruger and HK. I have since stepped up to 45 for oomph. Unless it is summer and boiling hot out, my 45XD goes pretty much anywhere with me. I am a full size American though, so I can hide the pistol relatively easy though.

__________________
Balou is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 12:51 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Default

Caliber selection is a hotly debated thing.

I've owned 6 XD's, and I personally prefer the .45.
Some will argue about how some smaller caliber rounds can stop well.

No one argues about the stopping power of the .45.

__________________
http://www.precisionfirearmfinishing.com
Dirk is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 09:11 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
Default

.45, Easier to shoot and around here the .40 and .45 ammo cost is the same.

__________________
greenjeans is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2008, 11:11 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tuckinauster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oshkosh,WI
Posts: 52
Default

i have a sig 226 in a .40 and my dad has a sig 220 in a .45. they are pretty much identical weapons, and i have put a lot of rounds through both. i actually prefer to shoot the .45, i like the recoil a little more and its easier to control. i am a better shot with my gun, and i have grown accustomed to the recoil. the other thing i really like about the .40 is the capacity, having an extra 4 rounds is kinda nice. all in all its more of a preference thing, get what fits what your gonna do with it.

__________________
tuckinauster is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
torn... lasherb1 1911 Forum 14 03-23-2008 05:13 PM