Originally Posted by BarryNiven
I've really liked the triggers on the 1911s that I've fired, but there's something about the single stack that has kept me away. 1911's are fantastic, but there's a reason Browning went on to create the doublestack. It was a serious step forward. Maybe think of it this way: If the only handguns people owned were 1911s then no one would care about the CA magazine size law.
So I just ran across the STI double stack '2011'. (STI Guns
) I'm thinking of buying one, but it will have to be without firing at a range ahead of time. I'll have to drive a couple of hours just to get to a dealer that stocks them.
I'm happy to pay $2000 for a gun; but I'll be annoyed if I pay $2000 for a gun I don't like. Any hands on experience and comments? Comparisons to other single stack 1911's? If I like a 1911, am I going to like the STI doublestack?
Some people like single stacks, some like double stacks and some don't care. I have one double stack gun (a Bersa 9) and while I like it I'd have to say that I almost always prefer a single stack. They simply fit my hand better. I once thought I'd like a Berretta 92 - until I actually held one. Didn't fit me and didn't like the feel.
It would be a serious mistake to think than Browning improved on the 1911 by creating a double stack 9mm in the Browning Hi Power. Browning submitted a design based on the criteria he was given - he was commissioned by FN to design a 9mm with capacity of at least 10 rounds and magazine disconnect. He provided a design that was radically modified by another designer two years after Brownings death. Although the Hi Power is a great gun, it was never intended by Browning as a replacement for the 1911.
STI makes great guns s but I've never owned one, and they are known for their double stack versions of the 1911. I doubt you would be disappointed.