Originally Posted by skullcrusher
Yes, please draw me a picture. Since it is paifully obvious that you have superior cognitive reasoning, please enlighten me on how the felony is not a big deal since you see nothing wrong with the crime. I suppose it is less ammo for the Brady's because a teacher bought a gun for a student who travels around with a firearm the student is not legal to own or posess. I find it hard to believe that a teacher would put his/her retirement future in jeopardy for a 20 year old student. I imagine that is a healthy student/teacher relationship.
Which tech school is your brother attending?
Although I am just a lowly local cop, and not "Fed", this purchase, on it face, seems to be a straw purchase and very illegal. If the the "teacher" were a relative, or if he kept the gun at his house until "the brother" was 21 that would make a difference. However, by buying the gun with the intention to sell, and actually selling, it to a 20 year old who by law is under the legal age to own a handgun it is a violation of the law. An exception could be if the "brother" were in law enforcement or the military and needed the weapon to fulfill his work duties, but this does not seem to be the case.