Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > 1911 Forum > Series 70 or 80?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2010, 06:33 AM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers, AR
Posts: 6,262
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Poor guy was virtually kicked in the junk!

Welcome to FTF!!

__________________
Gojubrian is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:16 AM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,152
Liked 21 Times on 7 Posts

Default

I guess I need to work on my communication skills. I answered the question with 100% factual information twice - and Cane still had to come by and clarify it. Calling a Kimber, Para Ordnance, or S&W a "series 80" is a pet peeve of mine much like calling a magazine a clip. They have a FPB but ONLY a Colt can actually be a series 70 or 80. A Kimber without a FPB is actually called a series "I" or 1st generation...

__________________

Last edited by NGIB; 03-17-2010 at 09:51 AM.
NGIB is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:29 AM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers, AR
Posts: 6,262
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NGIB View Post
I guess I need to work on my communication skills. I answered the question with 100% factual information twice - and Cane still had to come by and clarify it. Calling a Kimber, Para Ordnance, or S&W a "series 80" is a pet peeve of mine much like calling a magazine a clip. They have a FPB but ONLY a Colt can actually be a series 70 or 80. A Kimber without a FPB is actually called a series "I" or 1st generation...
Tone cannot be read on forums, but frequently people with much greater knowledge of platforms come off as snobs to those who are starting out. I'm jes' sayin'.

It would be nice if all these 1911 manufacturers would have more things be universal. This is called this on this brand, but not on that brand....

I do the same thing when discussing martial arts,lol.
__________________

Last edited by Gojubrian; 03-17-2010 at 10:30 AM. Reason: add
Gojubrian is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:47 AM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,152
Liked 21 Times on 7 Posts

Default

It's not just the terms that differ, Colt operates their FPB off the trigger and S&W operates theirs off the grip safety - totally different linkages. I guess I'll just start answering things in "good ol'boy" lingo...

__________________

Last edited by NGIB; 03-17-2010 at 10:52 AM.
NGIB is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 08:28 PM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers, AR
Posts: 6,262
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NGIB View Post
It's not just the terms that differ, Colt operates their FPB off the trigger and S&W operates theirs off the grip safety - totally different linkages. I guess I'll just start answering things in "good ol'boy" lingo...
Countrybonics? Booniebonics?

Just remember, some of us are more dense than others. Sometimes I request it to be explained like I'm 6yrs old.
__________________
Gojubrian is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 08:35 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
superc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Winchester
Posts: 341
Liked 15 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

Here, try this answer...

The S&W gun is not a series 70, or a series 80. It is actually a post WWI, pre WWII design, 1930s vintage 1911A1 (which is the least often encountered variety of Colt) clone. In the 30s Colt used the Swartz safety, but not on the military variants. The military contract for the pistol dated back to 1911 with only a few design changes, largely based on feedback from the field approved in 1922 (and known thereafter as the 1911A1). The Swartz safety design was never in that improvement list, as it came out after 1922. During WWII no Colt pistols were made for civilian sale. The military demand for pistols was so large Colt had to drop almost everything else and even then couldn't keep up with demand. This is what led to sub-contracts with Remington, Ithca, Singer sewing machines, etc. for them to also make the gun too. [Many even smaller companies got contracts to make just one or two parts for the gun, by the thousands, such as magazines, slide stops, grips, etc.] Blueprints were drawn up at government expense and freely shared. After WWII Colt never went back to the pre-war design for the 1911A1. Nothing wrong with it, they just didn't. [With literally millions of vets and other survivors world-wide wanting a pistol just like the one they (or a buddy) had in the recent war why would they?] S&W (and others) picked the Swartz up as an 'abandoned' design feature.

In the 1970s with literally millions of Colts, military variants, and clones flooding the market coupled with some really bad marketing and labor management decisions dragging them down Colt decided to boost 1911a1 sales by 'improving' the pistol. Hence the Mk. 70 variant. An accuracy improvement in the barrel and bushing assembly that was more theoretical than actual as quality control was suffering so some shooters saw no improvement. Then it was learned that the collet springs that were in the 70s bushing sometimes broke and what a pistol jam that could make. A cutting torch would then be needed to fix it. In the 80s after dropping the Mk. 70, and based on shooters (and their lawyers) discovering that if a loaded pistol is thrown on the floor it sometimes fires Colt came out with a new firing pin safety. This is the series 80 safety. No living human has ever disclosed why the Series 80 safety was deemed superior by Colt to their earlier Swartz safety. [It is suspected by some that Colt corporate leadership was then composed largely of people who knew nothing at all of what products the company had made 50 years earlier, and who were so disconnected from their own workforce the idea of asking the oldtimers on the factory floor or the archive section never even occurred to them. Similar 'why didn't they' questions also periodically pop up with respect to their Anaconda vs. New Service and the very brief return to the .380 market in the 90s with the Government and Mustang vs the 1946 proposed modernization of the 1908 380. Whatever...]


However, this is all irrelevant for ordering many pistol parts for your .45 today. The S&W 1911 gun is a 1911A1 looks like as is the Sig, the Randall and 1000 other makes. The magazine of a generic 1911, a 1911A1 (pre-series 70), or a series 80, or a series 70 is the same in that they will all fit and interchange, so too are the mainspring, the recoil spring, grips and the pins. The distinction becomes important only when talking about certain specific parts. Which specific part are you thinking of switching out in your S&W?

__________________

Last edited by superc; 03-17-2010 at 09:16 PM. Reason: added a line and some ()s, then redid it.
superc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 09:32 PM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: St. Louis,Missouri
Posts: 1,121
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

What I would like to know is WHO is the OP ordering parts from that is asking if his S&W is a 70 or 80 series?

__________________
What is this 100m you speak of?! Here in AMERICA we shoot in YARDS boy, a meter is something I use to measure voltage with.
-- Dillinger

Wer anderen etwas vorgedacht, wird jahrelang nur ausgelacht.
Begreift man die Entdeckung endlich, so nennt sie jeder selbstverständlich.
-- Wilhelm Busch
Highpower is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:29 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tackleberry1 View Post
Low...Yes, but damn accurate...
Okay, everybody - DOG PILE!!!!



As of yet, I have not ordered any parts, but in looking over those offered by Wilson, Brown, etc, they make no exception for ignorant punks like me and my Smith. Next time I ask a question I'll make sure I'm good and drunk - just to compete.
__________________

Last edited by SHAMUSPI; 03-17-2010 at 10:33 PM.
SHAMUSPI is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:33 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,152
Liked 21 Times on 7 Posts

Default

The question remains: what parts do you need?

__________________
NGIB is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2010, 10:39 PM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NGIB View Post
The question remains: what parts do you need?
I am interested in those parts featured as "Bullet Proof," "Hardcore," etc. All of my guns are carry guns, and no matter the cost, I want to have the maximum reliability in them, regardless if they may be a "waste of money."
__________________
SHAMUSPI is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
M&P9 Pro Series Mr. Bluesky Semi-Auto Handguns 17 01-09-2010 12:51 AM
Best of the Best Series Benning Boy The Club House 4 12-21-2009 05:33 PM
70 Series vs 80 Series glockfire 1911 Forum 4 10-12-2008 05:06 PM
Flashpoint - TV Series Dillinger The Club House 13 09-21-2008 03:12 AM